The Brighton Range Light in Charlottetown is one of the most photographed lighthouses on Prince Edward Island. The coast guard has cancelled, for now, plans to repair the beacon. Guardian photo
Plans to renovate one of the most photographed lighthouses in Prince Edward Island has been cancelled — for now.
Mark Chin-Yee, a coast guard spokesman, told The Guardian Wednesday that they haven’t been able to reach an agreement with city council and have to put the plans on hold, at least until next year.
The coast guard is proposing an overhaul of the Brighton Range Light, the lighthouse that sits at the edge of Brighton Shore and is photographed on an almost daily basis from Victoria Park.
Those renovation plans include removing the upper 1.5 metres of the structure, replacing the deck, lowering the cupola and light and recladding it with vinyl siding and vinyl windows.
Estimated cost of the project is $250,000.
On two occasions since the coast guard met with Deputy Mayor Stu MacFadyen and area residents, council has rejected the renovation plans.
“Right now, we have cancelled the project,” Chin-Yee said in a telephone interview from his office in Dartmouth, N.S.
“The work has to be done before the winter.”
Each year, before the ice sets in the harbour, the coast guard removes the buoys, leaving the Brighton Range Light as the only navigational aid in the harbour.
To start the work now means that one navigational aid would be disabled and the coast guard can’t do that.
“We’ll go back and work with council to come up with an acceptable solution to them and us and then we have to resubmit the project for funding.”
Chin-Yee says renovations are needed due to normal wear and tear on the lighthouse over the years, especially from ice buildup in the harbour that has taken its toll on the base of the structure.
A storm surge in 2000 caused extensive damage to the lighthouse, prompting the federal government to consider decommissioning the light.
Residents fought against the plan and the light was saved.
However, little work has been carried out since.
Chin-Yee says the coast guard understands the Brighton Range Light is a significant historic presence in Charlottetown.
After meeting with MacFadyen and area residents in March, the coast guard was under the impression everyone was OK with plans for the structure.
However, the lighthouse is designated as a heritage property and requires the approval of council and the heritage committee.
Chin-Yee says in order to protect the base against ice buildup, the base needs to be raised 1.5 metres but that means reducing the height of the structure by 1.5 metres because, as a navigational aid for ships, the Brighton lighthouse and the lighthouse behind it must be exactly the same height.
“The altitude of the light is critical because it lines up with another range behind it . . . it’s a bearing (for vessels). You line up the two lights and that way you know your ship is on the right heading.”
Council also has a problem with replacing wood on the lighthouse with low-maintenance vinyl siding.
However, Chin-Yee says the type of siding they want to use gives the appearance of wooden shingles.
“Wood is a continuing maintenance headache. We look at the cost of installation for its life cycle, not just one-time costs.”
As anyone who has wooden shingles on their house knows, wood needs to be repainted every few years whereas vinyl siding does not.
In addition, failing the raise the base of the lighthouse out of harm’s way means the coast guard has to worry about constant patching.
“Nothing happens before 2010 at the soonest.”
The Guardian is committed to encouraging intelligent discourse among our readers and to creating a forum where diverse views and opinions on a wide range of topics can be aired. The forum you are in now is a result of our continuing efforts to facilitate a dynamic online conversation among our readers.
This is a moderated conversation. Once a reader follows the steps to register and submit his or her comment it goes to a moderator for the website. Once it has been approved, your comment will be displayed on the website. A comment may be edited or deleted for reasons of content or language.
All readers wishing to join a conversation must first sign in and agree to the Terms of Usage, which explain the rules of acceptable content.
JBM from PEI writes: How would the two lights line up if they had decommissioned it in 2000?
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
The Watcher from PE writes: If, as the CG says, the two lights must be exactly the same height, would not the light in the foreground (from a seaward point of view) block the light behind it?
It's been 9 years since the storm surge of 2000 and its consequence damage and the CG is only now considering refurbishing the light.
Where do they come up with these excuses.
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
NOTE
The management of this site emphasizes that it is in no way liable for persons, physical or legal, who are hosted here. Moreover, the managers of this site may not be held liable for errors and omissions that may slip into the information displayed in these reader comments. Everyone who submits a comment should read, understand and agree to the Terms of Usage for this section.