Fair Elections Act serious attempt to protect integrity of system

Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

By Garth Staples (Guest Opinion): I have been loath to react to the letters and opinions presented in this forum concerning the Fair Elections Act presently before Parliament. They have become more shrill and inaccurate as the submissions increase. They keep repeating the same mistaken interpretations.

I have probably knocked on more doors canvassing for politicians including both my own successful and unsuccessful candidacies than anyone on P.E.I. This experience from the age of 14 when my political hero, Robert Stanfield became premier of N.S. to J. Angus MacLean who was also to bring the same integrity and honesty, as P.E.I. premier, to public life with a set of standards which I have tried to emulate.

I have studied and abided by election acts in N.S., Ont., N.B., P.E.I. and Canada. I have assisted hundreds of Canadians in their quest to vote. I have seen some pretty shabby conduct in the name of democracy from vote buying with the $5 bill to the pint of rum. Robert Stanfield and Angus MacLean would have none of that. In Ontario the practice was unheard of.

In N.B. a table was full of goodies inside the polling booth for the taking. People were sworn-in and voted, when they were incapable of understanding the process. During my first 25 years on P.E.I., I, like many Islanders, became aware of some pretty shabby practices. Vouching for people who do not have the capacity to understand the process was and is absolutely wrong, yet some today would insist on this horrible practice. Election officials must bear some of the blame for turning a blind eye, not knowing or taking their responsibilities seriously.

The new Fair Elections act is a serious attempt to protect the integrity of the system which is such an integral part of our democracy. Under the new system it will be easier to vote at your pleasure and leisure. Today it is common practice to use personal identification in our everyday living. Should the voting system be any less demanding?

The shrill cries that thousands of Canadians will be barred from voting, is a sad attempt to confuse and conceal the truth. Why are these charges being leveled? Are there private agendas?The citing of homeless people and those on Indian Reservations as examples of disenfranchisement demonstrates that the act has not been read or understood. Provisions have been included to allow these people to vote, should they choose?

Suggestions have been made that the Chief Electoral Officer, who serves at the pleasure of Parliament, should be chief investigator, prosecutor and judge flies in the face of the separation of powers so long cherished in our democracy. Prosecution must remain the responsibility of the Justice department.

I ask all those who see the new act as an attempt to rob some people of their right to vote to read the bill and if necessary seek clarification before running off in all directions.

 

- Garth E. Staples of Charlottetown is a former senior civil servant, tourism operator, businessman and instructor.

Geographic location: , P.E.I., Canada, Ontario Charlottetown

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page

Comments

Comments

Recent comments

  • Bill Milligan
    April 16, 2014 - 16:46

    Garth, the election abuses you describe no doubt happened. On PEI rum was the bribe of choice for many years. But that was many, many years ago and the electoral laws have changed and that kind of abuse no longer happens. By all accounts, except from hyper partisans like you, the current electoral laws work well and are not in need of major changes. By the way, don't you think that such major changes being contemplated to such a fundamental right of democracy as voting should be a well reasoned debate and not the majority government trying to ram this down our throats just because Harper has a grudge against Elections Canada? That is what this all about. Harper and the Conservatives had their knuckles rapped for the so-called in and out scheme, robo calling and some Conservatives over spending so the chief electoral officer is going to be spanked into doing what Harper wants.

  • Robert Chalmers
    April 16, 2014 - 16:31

    Garth, you and the rest of Stephen Harper's stable of lickspittles are the only people I have seen or heard who are in favour of this bill. The way you toady up to Harper makes me seriously think you are after the vacancy left by Mike Duffy.

  • Phil
    April 16, 2014 - 15:01

    Another rant from Staples filled with inaccuracy and half truths . Much like conservative MP Butt and conservative Senator Mcinnis Staples says he has witnessed illegal behaviour but doesn't explain why he didn't report the crime. I have read the bill as have countless experts in the field and the conservatives can not name a single expert who believes this is a good bill. There is no evidence of widespread fraud as a result of vouching according to Mr Neufeld , the man who authored the report that the government is using to support its position. Mr Staples is clearly a Conservative mouthpiece as his opinions match the party talking points to the letter. Please stop.