Deep-water wells put precious resource at risk

Letters to the Editor (The Guardian)
Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

A farmer irrigates his field in western Queens County in this Guardian file photo from the summer of 2013.

If policy suspected of causing harm, burden of proof falls on those taking action

Commentary by Gary Schneider

As if we didn’t already have enough pressure on our natural resources, the P.E.I. Potato Board and Cavendish Farms are now lobbying for the provincial government to lift the existing moratorium on deep-water wells for irrigating potato crops.

Alarms are sounding across the Island in response to this issue. Looking at the present threats to our groundwater and surface water should make everyone nervous about applying any additional pressure.  

In 2013, there were two fish kills in the province. In the past, these have almost all been linked to agricultural runoff, a clear sign there are chemicals getting into our waterways that are toxic to fish and other living things.

Last year there were also 23 cases of anoxic conditions in our waterways, killing not only fish but a host of other aquatic life including shellfish. Our rivers run red with Island soil after every rainfall. The Winter River runs dry because too much water is being extracted for the City of Charlottetown.  

Nitrate levels in many wells in the province’s potato belts exceed Health Canada guidelines for drinking water. In our streams, the nitrate levels are also much higher than those recommended by the federal government for wildlife. The most frightening thing about high nitrate levels is a federal-provincial study found that in the Wilmot watershed, if farmers stopped using fertilizers immediately it could still take 20 years for nitrates to come back down to normal levels.  

And now the potato industry wants more water. In some ways, the argument sounds simple: we take water for irrigation, but it goes back into the same aquifer. A continuous cycle, you could almost say it was renewable. But as an Island farmer once explained to me, this is taking our most pristine groundwater and replacing it with water laden with pesticides and fertilizers. And not all the water goes back. Much is trucked away in those water-heavy potatoes, and much will evaporate.  

The potato industry claims the science is there to support their position. But it is important to carefully examine this claim. This same science that suggests an abundant water supply on P.E.I. has also been the basis of the unsustainable water extraction and degradation of habitat on the Winter River. A growing number of important questions about this claim and the current policy have been raised by biologist Darryl Guignion and others. We don’t really understand the impact of such water extraction on aquatic ecosystems: the policy lacks data to support it, lacks methods of adequately monitoring streams and doesn’t consider the impact of wells on the diverse tributaries of a river system.

I don’t object to the potato industry asking for more water, in much the same way that I don’t mind when a child asked for a third and fourth piece of chocolate cake.

The key will be how our government, and the citizens of this province, respond to this request, and to existing threats to our water.

The factthe potato industry has hired Liberal party insiders to lobby our MLAs exhibits the type of behaviour that might have been acceptable in the past but will not play out very well in the public today. This is an issue that is close to the hearts of Islanders, and we all need to be involved in making a decision on the moratorium. So far, we haven’t seen any proof that lifting the moratorium won’t threaten Island waters.

The high-capacity wells are expensive and will add significant up-front costs to the growers, which they hope to recoup through higher yields. The problem is that these costs would make it increasingly difficult to make decisions based on the potential environmental harm. So much money will be invested in the crops that decisions will be made based on economic realities. If it is raining and you need to spray for blight, some farmers will feel forced to spray. If the wind exceeds recommended speeds for spraying but you might lose your crop, again, some farmers will feel forced to spray. It already happens in the province, without the increased economic pressure.

The Environmental Coalition of Prince Edward Island would like to add its voice to the Central Queen’s Wildlife Federation and many other individuals and organizations in asking for an “open and transparent public dialogue on this issue.” There should be clear and convincing evidence that this change will not threaten our groundwater or endanger aquatic habitat.

We also feel that before any changes, we would look at other solutions for water deficits during the growing season. Growers need to demonstrate more effective soil and water conservation practices. Increasing levels of organic matter in potato fields would be a key step in helping soils retain water. Reducing field size and enhancing buffer zones and forest cover to minimize runoff would also be beneficial.  

Should government go ahead with lifting the moratorium and approving new water extraction, there will be no going back once farmers pay for the costly irrigation systems. The large potato farmers will become more and more beholden to the Irvings and McCains, at the expense of the aquatic environment, recreational fisheries and our drinking water.

The province can help break the cycle and support farmers’ independence with policies, programs, incentives for enriching the soil, supporting healthy hydrologic cycles and protecting our natural resource.

We need to think this move through and honestly consult with all Islanders before buckling to pressure from big players in the potato industry.


Gary Schneider is co-chair of the Environmental Coalition of Prince Edward Island

Organizations: P.E.I. Potato Board, Health Canada, Environmental Coalition of Prince Edward Island Wildlife Federation

Geographic location: Iceland, Charlottetown, Wilmot Irvings McCains

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page