• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (4)

Speeding tickets up in 2011, despite earlier reports of drop

Charlottetown City Councillor David MacDonald, centre, enjoys a light moment with Coun. Edward Rice, left, while Coun. Danny Redmond checks his paperwork during the January monthly meeting of council Monday at City Hall. Guardian photo by Nigel Armstrong

Charlottetown City Councillor David MacDonald, centre, enjoys a light moment with Coun. Edward Rice, left, while Coun. Danny Redmond checks his paperwork during the January monthly meeting of council Monday at City Hall.

Published on January 10, 2012
Published on January 10, 2012
Teresa Wright  RSS Feed
Topics :
Charlottetown

Charlottetown City Council was given some new speeding statistics Monday night, showing the number of speeding tickets increased in 2011 over the year before.

But that paints a very different picture of policing speeders in the city than information released in November, which indicated a drop in speeding tickets issued during the same period.

Two months ago, the city's police committee released statistics showing 806 fewer Highway Traffic Act tickets were issued in 2011 compared to 2010.

When asked, reporters were told most Highway Traffic Act tickets result from speeding.

The Guardian then published an editorial raising concern over this apparent drop in speeding tickets while, during the same period, the number of collisions in the city was up.

During the Monday night meeting of council, Coun. David MacDonald, chair of protective and emergency services, took issue with the editorial.

"It's absolutely not true, and not only is it nonsense to draw that correlation even if it was true, the actual fact is the numbers don't reflect that at all."

MacDonald then presented a more detailed breakdown of traffic ticket and accident numbers.

These did show a slight increase in overall reportable accidents - 611 as of the end of November 2011 compared to 606 as of same date in 2010.

But although total tickets issued were down, the number of speeding tickets rose by 10 per cent between November 2010 and 2011.

He pointed to a $145,000 increase in revenue generated from the police department in 2011 as a major indicator of a crackdown on speeders as well as drunk drivers.

MacDonald also pointed out the number of ‘reportable accidents' did increase in 2011, but those included any accident with $1,000 or more in damages or where there is an injury.

"We all know that it doesn't take much, especially with today's vehicles, for an accident to have $1,000 damage and many of those accidents occur in parking lots, it has absolutely no correlation with speeding."

He said The Guardian's editorial linking an increase in ‘reportable accidents' with a false belief that speeding tickets had decreased gave the wrong impression about the level of police enforcement and safety of city streets.

"I think it was the kind of thing that builds into that general feeling out there that there's a lack of enforcement, and I just thought that tonight was an opportunity to maybe straighten that up a little bit."

But MacDonald admitted the confusion arose from councillors not having received detailed breakdowns of the information about these tickets and violations.

As a result, he said he plans to give council the specific monthly speeding ticket numbers and avoid the confusion of only providing general Highway Traffic Act violation numbers.

"I have no trouble doing that and I probably will. I'll ask council if they'd like some more detailed information," MacDonald said.

 

Comments

  • Username
    Alan
    - January 10, 2012 at 15:08:56

    The cops are doing their jobs, but unless their numbers increase by a large margin they can't be everywhere or everything to us all. Just enforcing the speed limit with more tickets is not the only answer. The driving public have to change their attitudes when behind the wheel. Get OFF the phone, USE your signal lights, THINK about where you are and those around you, and PAY ATTENTION while driving. Doing these plus a lot more, will reduce accidents more than any cop stopping a speeder.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    voter
    - January 10, 2012 at 09:05:43

    i could speed any day ,everyday -i could use my cell phone while driving any day,everyday--- i see it any day , all around me when i drive around town --- i do neither because i am smarter than those who speed and use cells while driving --- give me photo radar as quickly as possible to save innocent pedstrians and drivers from these dangerous people-- never mind the funny little statistics coming out of city hall-- just take a look at the drivers around you ay time you are out and about

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Fender Bender
    - January 10, 2012 at 09:04:55

    Other than parking lot accidents (because people seem to drive any which way in a parking lot) a lot of accidents are cause by well meaning drivers. These are the people who stop to allow someone else to pull out into traffic. While this is a nice gesture what it causes is a huge blind spot for all moving traffic, especially if there is more than two lanes, along comes a car in another lane and BANG. Who gets the blame for this? The person who pulled out into traffic when the nice person stopped to wave them out. This also has nothing to do with speeding.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Jason Bourne
    - January 10, 2012 at 09:04:16

    Other than speeding and drunk drivers, what's an islander to do to get pulled over? Running reds? Nope. Following too closely? Nope. Cutting across two lanes to turn left onto University Ave? Nope. Cutting across parking lots instead of waiting at lights? Pulling into the wrong lane when turning onto a two lane street? Going half the speed limit when going uphill, twice the limit going downhill? Pulling over without using signal lights? Yielding to pedestrians at crosswalks? No, no and no. Charlottetown has long needed about 6 more full time officers, but don't expect this broke town to invest in that. Doesn't take a psychic to predict what happens when a city grows so much and judges keep handing out the minimum justice.

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Guardian is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Expert bloggers

Ride for Heart
Blogger
Heart and Stroke Foundation
Preparation is key
[Sponsored]

More bloggers here

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

The Guardian Twitter

Advertising