GAIL LETHBRIDGE: Griping about ‘youth today’ is a rite of passage
A few questions with Halifax artist Élana Camille Saimovici
Why can’t it be you? The driving force behind success
SUCCESS = career + money ... or does it?
Should I stay or should I go? A look at graduate retention
A conversation with Canadian Armed Forces veteran and health ...
Generational value gaps shifting as individualist thinking warps view ...
Success: Two women. Two lives. One take.
Five questions, 10 answers: let's make prejudice, inequality history
Money. Happiness. Family. How do we define success?
I have been observing the ‘Yes’ and ‘No’ sides of the MMP (mixed member proportional) debate both in the news and in the propaganda being sent to our homes. The part of all of it that offends me, and I suspect any discerning Islander, the most is the choice of language that is consistently being touted by the "No" side. In every letter, ad, or document they create, we will see words like "dangerous," "extremely complicated," "confusing," and "long-term ramifications." This divisive language may work in the politics of places like the U.S., but Canadians generally, and Islanders in particular, are not fools. We can make an informed decision with clear heads and calm demeanor based on "facts" without the ‘No’ side resorting to fear-based campaigns that insult our collective intelligence without offering a shred of useful detail that furthers the debate. I suspect this entire "Breitbart" style will very likely backfire. It certainly has with me.
Bill A. McKinnon,