GAIL LETHBRIDGE: Griping about ‘youth today’ is a rite of passage
A few questions with Halifax artist Élana Camille Saimovici
Why can’t it be you? The driving force behind success
SUCCESS = career + money ... or does it?
Should I stay or should I go? A look at graduate retention
A conversation with Canadian Armed Forces veteran and health ...
Generational value gaps shifting as individualist thinking warps view ...
Success: Two women. Two lives. One take.
Five questions, 10 answers: let's make prejudice, inequality history
Money. Happiness. Family. How do we define success?
As we enter the final days of the provincial election campaign, the P.E.I. Coalition for Women in Government is focusing on promoting MMP (mixed member proportional representation) as an opportunity to increase the participation of women in the Legislative Assembly of P.E.I. More women are running in the 2019 provincial election than any other election in P.E.I.’s history. But within the first-past-the-post (FPTP) electoral system, it’s taken more than 150 years to reach this milestone. In fact, it’s taken 30 years to move from 27 per cent women candidates in 1989 to 33 per cent in 2019. At the current pace of change, it will take 105 years to reach gender balance in the legislative assembly.
How do we accelerate this glacial pace of change? The answer is, of course, multifaceted. It will take a concerted and sustained effort on behalf of individuals, political parties, and the legislature. At the coalition, we believe one piece of the puzzle is modernizing the electoral system. No electoral system includes guaranteed incentives to increase representation of women and diverse groups. Yet, when we look at the jurisdictions around the world with the highest percentages of women the overwhelming majority (84 per cent) use some form of proportional representation.
Over the past 15 years, the coalition has consistently advocated for a proportional electoral system, not because it benefits or disadvantages some parties over others, but because research shows that it tends to elect more women. Our current system (FPTP) is based on presenting candidates one by one, district by district, and women are not often enough selected as the candidate. When parties can run candidates in each district and also create a list, they can choose a more balanced slate with more variety of candidates. It also creates a contagion effect between parties: each party wants as varied and strong a list as every other party, so diversity catches on. All parties will benefit from the diversity of perspectives and experiences new voices will bring.
The proportional system on the referendum ballot – mixed member proportional – combines first-past-the-post district seats with open-list proportional seats. This option is exciting because it has been shown to increase opportunity for advocacy. Research shows women elected under MMP open-list systems are more likely than women elected under closed-list systems to raise women’s issues to their caucus, work collaboratively with other women to further women’s issues, and vote in support of women’s issues.
Ultimately, at the P.E.I. Coalition for Women in Government, our vision is to see better outcomes for Islanders – from leaders as diverse as the population. At a time when women’s voices are desperately needed at decision-making tables, can we afford to wait 105 years for gender balance? Islanders have a chance this election to vote for a new way of electing representatives. Voting Yes for MMP is one way to create new opportunities for diverse voices to be heard.
Dawn Wilson is the executive director of the P.E.I. Coalition for Women in Government.