Web Notifications

SaltWire.com would like to send you notifications for breaking news alerts.

Activate notifications?

Run-in with protesters raises questions about lack of security detail for deputy PM Freeland

Dal political sociologist says access to high-profile ministers a sign of Canadian openness

Earlier this week, protesters briefly blocked Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland’s entrance to Halifax City Hall - Reuters

STORY CONTINUES BELOW THESE SALTWIRE VIDEOS

Olive Tapenade & Vinho Verde | SaltWire

Watch on YouTube: "Olive Tapenade & Vinho Verde | SaltWire"

OTTAWA, Ont. — Earlier this week, protesters briefly blocked Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland’s entrance to Halifax City Hall where she was meeting with Mayor Mike Savage.

Seemingly unperturbed, Freeland pushed past the crowd who were acting in solidarity with Wet'suwet'en hereditary chiefs and others across the country in protesting the building of the Coastal Gaslink pipeline through traditional and unceded First Nations territory in B.C.

While many had opinions on Freeland’s actions and whether or not pushing through peaceful protesters was a good move, some also questioned how Canada’s deputy prime minister got so close to protesters and why she had no security detail to speak of.

Howard Ramos.
Howard Ramos.

According to Dalhousie political sociologist Howard Ramos, cabinet ministers in Canada, a category that includes the deputy PM, rarely get any form of security.

“I think that in general, it's very Canadian that most ministers don't have a security detail and this is something that makes something Canada quite distinct,” Ramos said.

“The Canadian political system is based on openness and access and even with you look at the prime minister in comparison to other world leaders access ... Most prime ministers usually do wade into crowds and do make public appearances without a huge protocol or bulletproof glass or big SUVs.”

Ramos said this promotes a kind of cultural openness in Canada and recognizes one of the roles of politicians is to be accessible and accountable to the public.

The RCMP’s Protective Policing Services is officially responsible for the personal protection of the governor-general of Canada, the prime minister, their families and residences as well as for the safety of Supreme and Federal Court judges and federal cabinet ministers.

But other than the prime minister, who has near-constant security detail, cabinet ministers rarely have any sort of security. A notable exception is former Environment minister Catherine McKenna after repeated sexist and hateful comments and threats caused some concern about her safety.

Some people will applaud her for pushing through (and) condemn the protesters for blocking her way, other people will condemn her for pushing through the protesters,

- Howard Ramos

Freeland’s safety was not clearly endangered by the Halifax protesters, but since it’s been quite a while since Canada has a deputy prime minister — the last was Anne McLellan under Paul Martin — Ramos said how her office will handle the security question going forward remains to be seen.

“We’re in uncharted territory where policy is being rethought about what the role is and what are the security protocols,” he said.

As for Freeland’s decision to stand her ground amidst protests, Ramos said it was a conscious choice for her — she could have postponed the meeting or changed locations — and the public will read into it what they want.

“Some people will applaud her for pushing through (and) condemn the protesters for blocking her way, other people will condemn her for pushing through the protesters,” he said.

“It certainly speaks to her tenacity and her belief that there's a right to protest and there's also a right for her to do her work.”

Freeland’s office would not comment on security measures.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT