Controversial policy lifted at O'Leary hospital TERESA WRIGHT The Guardian
A policy that forced patients at Community Hospital in O’Leary to sign mandatory Do Not Resuscitate forms upon admittance has been revoked after residents and other officials raised concerns.
The O’Leary hospital is currently undergoing a transition that has seen its emergency room close and the hospital operate instead as an urgent care facility.
It is also undergoing a $6- million expansion with 15 more beds being added to the Margaret Stewart Ellis home within the hospital as well as the addition of the Beechwood Community Health Centre.
As an urgent care facility, only patients in need of palliative, restorative, convalescent or minor acute care treatment are admitted but sometimes other types of acute care patients present to the hospital.
The Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) form is usually used only for palliative patients or those who are forced to stay at Community Hospital for situational reasons. It ensures liability is not placed upon the hospital, whose primary function is to act as an acute care facility. Patients needing urgent or emergency care are to go to the hospital in neighbouring Alberton.
But up until recently, Community Hospital was getting all admitted patients to sign the DNR form due to liability concerns.
Many in the community were upset about this.
“The concern was that if everybody had to sign the DNR form to be admitted to acute care in O’Leary then that’s not the definition of acute care as the general public would perceive it, nor is it as government would perceive it,” said O’Leary-Inverness MLA Robbie Henderson.
He received a number of complaints from residents, including a group of concerned citizens who did not believe everyone should have to sign away their right to be resuscitated upon admittance to the hospital.
“The original concept of the form was for palliative patients or the patient who steadfastly refused to go to another facility based on the recommendation of the physician, but as it seemed to evolve that everybody was having to sign it, it took awhile to identify that it was an issue and to come up with the measures to address the problem,” Henderson said.
After looking into the situation, the Health Department signed a contract with one physician at the hospital to take on responsibility for admitting patients who would also bear the responsibility of any potential liability concerns with regards to being resuscitated.
“Once the concerns were identified I asked my department to go back in and to evaluate the decision on the DNR, and certainly after some good discussions and some
good debates, we were able to indicate that the DNR is not part of the initial criteria,” Health Minister Doug Currie said Wednesday.
The Guardian is committed to encouraging intelligent discourse among our readers and to creating a forum where diverse views and opinions on a wide range of topics can be aired. The forum you are in now is a result of our continuing efforts to facilitate a dynamic online conversation among our readers.
This is a moderated conversation. Once a reader follows the steps to register and submit his or her comment it goes to a moderator for the website. Once it has been approved, your comment will be displayed on the website. A comment may be edited or deleted for reasons of content or language.
All readers wishing to join a conversation must first sign in and agree to the Terms of Usage, which explain the rules of acceptable content.
bannie ============== from chtown, pei writes: Who brought in that stupid law DNR and
made it mandatory upon going in to the
hospital,needs to be horse whipped severly then sent to hospital with DNR on
chart ,i would personally do the whipping.
If the persons them selves feel they want
the DNR on their chart fine that is their
personal choice.Not some non feeling
official.
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
NOTE
The management of this site emphasizes that it is in no way liable for persons, physical or legal, who are hosted here. Moreover, the managers of this site may not be held liable for errors and omissions that may slip into the information displayed in these reader comments. Everyone who submits a comment should read, understand and agree to the Terms of Usage for this section.