Major shakeup coming to Department of Health Health P.E.I. takes control of 'operational and service delivery', including pharmacy and dental programs
PROVINCE HOUSE BY WAYNE THIBODEAU The Guardian
The future of health care delivery is being thrown into question once again as the P.E.I. government gets set to create a new arm’s-length body to control the delivery of health care in Canada’s smallest province.
Health P.E.I. will take control of the operational and service delivery elements of the health care system, including pharmacy and dental programs.
That was outlined in the speech from the throne being delivered this afternoon at Province House in Charlottetown.
The throne speech outlines the provincial government’s priorities over the coming year.
In the speech, the province says it will introduce new legislation this fall creating the new health care body.
“In the long-term, a high quality, sustainable health care system can only be achieved through an effective governance structure,” the speech says.
But for those in the Department of Health, the idea of an arm’s-length body controlling the delivery of health care in the province is nothing new.
In 2003, the province created just that – a body called the Provincial Health Services Authority or PHSA. That authority controlled the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Charlottetown, the Prince County Hospital in Summerside as well as Hillsborough Hospital and Mount Herbert addictions facility.
Ironically, the CEO of the authority was none other than Keith Dewar, who is now the deputy minister of health.
Two years later in April 2005 the province scrapped the authority and centralized health care decision making within the Department of Health, describing the move as more cost effective.
In today’s throne speech, the province says the creation of Health P.E.I. may not be visible to Islanders on a day-to-day basis, but it is “foundational to ensuring that Islanders will get the care they need long into the future.”
The Guardian will have more on this story later, full details, including reaction to the speech from the throne, in The Guardian tomorrow. Tell us what you think. Post a comment below.
The Guardian is committed to encouraging intelligent discourse among our readers and to creating a forum where diverse views and opinions on a wide range of topics can be aired. The forum you are in now is a result of our continuing efforts to facilitate a dynamic online conversation among our readers.
This is a moderated conversation. Once a reader follows the steps to register and submit his or her comment it goes to a moderator for the website. Once it has been approved, your comment will be displayed on the website. A comment may be edited or deleted for reasons of content or language.
All readers wishing to join a conversation must first sign in and agree to the Terms of Usage, which explain the rules of acceptable content.
Dick Buttkiss from Charlottetown, PE writes: Ghiz must be appointing more Liberals to new, cushy positions so he'll have enough buddies to get re-elected again. Wait....what am I saying...Ghiz said he was against patronage didn't he?? Oh well....I guess politicians DO lie!!!
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
marty mc fly from pei writes: Another arms length health agency? Back to the Future again.
Government tried it under Callbeck and that didn't work. Government tried it again under Binns and that didn't work. Can't see why Health Reform 3.0 won't work out fine. Lord knows it will for the corporate movers, stationary salesmen, and the consultants.
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
OLD IS NOT NEW ! from PEI writes: (Ironically, the CEO of the authority was none other than Keith Dewar, who is now the deputy minister of health.
Two years later in April 2005 the province scrapped the authority and centralized health care decision making within the Department of Health, describing the move as more cost effective.)
Exactly! It didn't work in 2003! The reason they SCRAPED IT!
Maybe you should get your Department of Innovation and Learning to COME UP WITH A NEW PLAN vs. AN OLD PLAN THAT FAILED!!
GIVE ME A BREAK!! This is supposed to be Modernizing Health Care??? HOW? BY Using an Old System that was Scraped!
What INGENUITY! Not surprised!
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
pat of pei from carlottetown, pei writes: when will the government do something about regulating the rates that dentists are charging? there is no just reason to some of the charges and every dentist is different.
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
The Observer from Stratford, PE writes: So why not just get rid of the Department of Health? This could just be a way for Mr. Ghiz to provide nice comfy sinecures to his friends and contributors.
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
Stephen Pate from Charlottetown, PE writes: more of the same with the same outcome.
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
I .C. Ashuffle from charlottetown, pei writes: Sounds like they're re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic...again.
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
questioning from PEI writes: If you read the Dept. of heath homepage, they have someone already responsible for ''health operations''.
Is this merely a way to brand/label the biggest chunk of the department and leave all the financial & policy types down at teh Shaw Bldg with the ''Dept. of Health''?
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
Former Islander from Moncton, NB writes: Woo hoo, looks like more work for Deltaware. Deja Vu all over again?
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
bill from pei writes: why doe we need these useless politicians ?
we are stupid enough to have 20 extra of them running around the province acting important and interfering in peoples lives
fewer than a dozen.in total, effective people could run all aspects of all political parties
the rest are there for patronage, legal fees and pnp like free money
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
NOTE
The management of this site emphasizes that it is in no way liable for persons, physical or legal, who are hosted here. Moreover, the managers of this site may not be held liable for errors and omissions that may slip into the information displayed in these reader comments. Everyone who submits a comment should read, understand and agree to the Terms of Usage for this section.