Bell Aliant on track with fibre optic network rollout; profits down slightly
The Canadian Press
Bell Aliant Regional Communications Income Fund (TSX:BA.UN) is on track to rollout its advanced broadband network to customers in Fredericton and Saint John, N.B., by the middle of 2010.
“This technology removes bandwidth as a limitation in providing Internet and TV services,” CEO Karen Sheriff said Wednesday after Atlantic Canada’s dominant telecom company reported profits fell slightly.
The fibre optic network will allow faster downloads of music or movies and the ability to share video and photos faster.
Bell Aliant has announced that with the support of the New Brunswick government it would invest $60 million to serve more than 70,000 homes and business in Fredericton and Saint John by the middle of next year.
The fibre optic network also supports digital TV services, including high definition television.
More than 11,000 homes are now on the fibre optic network, Sheriff told a conference call.
Bell Aliant reported Tuesday that its net profits in the third quarter fell slightly to $74.3 million or 53 cents per diluted unit from $75 million or 58 cents per diluted unit a year ago as the company booked a restructuring charge and saw its revenues fall.
“The slow down in the economy has affected product sales across our various segments and we expend the trend to continue into the fourth quarter,” Sheriff told analysts.
In the quarter, Bell Aliant booked a pre-tax charge of $13 million for severance and other costs of implementing a consolidation plan that will see its Atlantic call centres consolidated from 16 to five.
The company, which had 9,200 employees at the end of 2008, also said its three-month revenues fell 2.6 per cent to $786 million from $807 million.
RBC Capital markets analyst Jonathan Allen said trimming costs remains important and that Bell Aliant’s management has acknowledged the economic picture remains challenging.
Bell Aliant also expects that residential phone lines will remain under pressure for another year or two as cable competitors expand phone service, Allen wrote in a note to clients.
“With a soft economy and rising access line losses to cable competition, cost cutting remains a key focus.”
Bell Aliant already has an extensive fibre optic system in the province, but the Fredericton and Saint John projects will be the first to connect every home and business directly to the fibre optic network.
Technology analyst Duncan Stewart said it will cost billions to build fibre optic networks in major urban areas across Canada, but it will eventually become the standard.
He estimated it would cost about $2,000 per home on a fibre optic network.
“The challenge is how do companies do this in such a way that it doesn’t bankrupt them and then how do you get your money back,” said Stewart, director of research and analysis at DSAM Consulting in Toronto.
Telecom analyst Eamon Hoey said Canada is lagging behind in fibre optic networks and noted by 2010 all of Shanghai will be on this kind of network at very high speeds.
“We’re 10 years behind the rest of the world in broadband,” said Hoey, of Toronto-based Hoey Associates Management Consultants Inc.
“This is the infrastructure that we need to be in the next generation in terms of business,” he said. “It’s the infrastructure that supports the new economy.”
Hoey estimated that it would cost about $1,000 per home depending on location and terrain to be on a fibre optic network.
The Guardian is committed to encouraging intelligent discourse among our readers and to creating a forum where diverse views and opinions on a wide range of topics can be aired. The forum you are in now is a result of our continuing efforts to facilitate a dynamic online conversation among our readers.
This is a moderated conversation. Once a reader follows the steps to register and submit his or her comment it goes to a moderator for the website. Once it has been approved, your comment will be displayed on the website. A comment may be edited or deleted for reasons of content or language.
All readers wishing to join a conversation must first sign in and agree to the Terms of Usage, which explain the rules of acceptable content.
John Getson from Richmond, Prince Edward Island writes: Since communications is as important, if not more so important, than transportation why don't we (the people) insist the government(s) treat them the same? Provide and maintain the distribution network infrastructure - cables, switches, poles, etc while commercial companies focus on the product. They currently do this with the majority of the transportation / distribution network - government provides the the roads, lights and signage while commercial companies provide the product - cars, trucks, buses, vehicle insurance, etc!
The cost?
Sure, there are costs involved but there are also costs of providing and maintaining the transport grid - construction and maintainance, policing and enforcement, healthcare (accidents and injuries) and we manage to pay for those with various fees and/or taxes like those on fuel, vehicle registrations and licensing, insurance premiums etc.
Major infrastructure development = national economic stimulus!
Same idea could be applied to the other utilities like electricity. Electricity being a pretty universal commodity regardless of the manner it is generated, if you want green power then you could buy from which ever supplier matches your personal preference not just the local options.
By putting the focuse on spending that would actually benefits the overall consumer. This would allow consumers to purchase the product / service from whoever we choose at what should be more competitive prices. And allow companies who may be more creative/responsible/green to focus on the service not the infrastructure needed to deliver it to the end user.
Any thoughts? Agree or disagree - we need to start the discussion
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
NOTE
The management of this site emphasizes that it is in no way liable for persons, physical or legal, who are hosted here. Moreover, the managers of this site may not be held liable for errors and omissions that may slip into the information displayed in these reader comments. Everyone who submits a comment should read, understand and agree to the Terms of Usage for this section.