Entegrity CEO blames economy, stimulus delay for company's problems WAYNE THIBODEAU The Guardian
A downturn in the global economy and the U.S. government’s delays in getting its economic stimulus money into people’s hands are being blamed for the financial problems at Entegrity Wind Systems, says its president and CEO.
Jim Heath said he believes his company, which is teetering on the edge of bankruptcy, can make a comeback if it’s given the chance to restructure its finances by the courts. He said new orders are coming in and the economic stimulus money promised by U.S. President Barack Obama is starting to get into people’s hands.
A P.E.I. Supreme Court justice will rule within days if Entegrity will get a 45-day extension to get its fiscal house in order.
If Justice Wayne Cheverie provides that extension, it will give the Charlottetown-based company some breathing room. If he denies the extension, the company will be deemed bankrupt.
“I can accept responsibility as the CEO, being in the leadership position, I’ll have to take responsibility but I do think we certainly have been hurt significantly by the economy here in the States and also by the legislation that was passed in February that was intended to stimulate our sector,” said Heath.
“People who would normally go find their financing decided to wait on the government financing. It really hasn’t happened yet.”
Entegrity, which builds small wind turbines, owes more than $11 million, according to court documents.
The company disputes those figures, saying it does not owe that much money.
Employees have not been paid since mid-May.
A major player in Entegrity is Malcolm Lodge, a P.E.I. man considered a pioneer in the wind energy business.
Lodge used to be president of Entegrity. He’s still a shareholder.
Lodge has not agreed to interview requests, but in court documents obtained by The Guardian Lodge reveals some of the problems at Entegrity, problems that go much deeper than the downturn in the economy.
In a sworn affidavit, Lodge said he often found Heath to be “difficult and confrontational.” He indicated that both men, principles in the company, had very different ideas about how the company should be operated.
Lodge was president of the company up until late August 2008. Heath then replaced him.
Still, Lodge owns about 11 per cent of the shares.
“(Heath) can also be very disagreeable in terms of discussing my ideas for running the company,” Lodge says in his affidavit.
“Mr. Heath and I were diametrically opposed in terms of how we should operate the company and what steps should be taken to best ensure the company’s success.”
Heath, who is based in Santa Fe, New Mexico, would not discuss Lodge’s involvement in the company past, present or future.
There are also questions about Entegrity’s future in Prince Edward Island.
In a sworn affidavit, John Gundy, vice-president of commercial lending with Mercantile Finance, Entegrity’s bank, said he was told by Heath that he was sourcing up to $10-million in new equity, and that it was “…his plan to move the entirety of (Entegrity’s) operations to the United States.”
But in an interview Monday, Heath said he planned to maintain his P.E.I. facilities.
“We have some excellent people there, and we have people with excellent experience, who know the equipment very well,” said Heath.
“It would only make sense for us to continue activity there.”
The Guardian is committed to encouraging intelligent discourse among our readers and to creating a forum where diverse views and opinions on a wide range of topics can be aired. The forum you are in now is a result of our continuing efforts to facilitate a dynamic online conversation among our readers.
This is a moderated conversation. Once a reader follows the steps to register and submit his or her comment it goes to a moderator for the website. Once it has been approved, your comment will be displayed on the website. A comment may be edited or deleted for reasons of content or language.
All readers wishing to join a conversation must first sign in and agree to the Terms of Usage, which explain the rules of acceptable content.
Mr. Dressup from Charlottetown, PEI writes: “…his plan to move the entirety of (Entegrity’s) operations to the United States.”
Funny how we as former EWSI employees were told that there would always be a Charlottetown office and manufacturing. Guess we were lied to back then also.
This all goes hand in hand with my comment on yesterdays story! Wayne is getting at the truth, Entegrity's problems are far deeper then just money.
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
BS from PEI writes: I ve been in business 30 years (mostly in the States), been employed and worked with companies big and small. Blaming the economy for not paying your employees is total garbage and the sign of an executive who doesn't know when end from the other - or one who tells an outright falsehood. I suppose if one's business plan is based on getting government money (how gullible is the province?) then it's no surprise that NOT getting government money causes problems. The real question is when will PEI learn that the best way to attract good businesses is to provide a level playing field with good infrastructure and the same incentives and benefits for all.
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
Tired from PEI writes: How much money have they gotten from the government of PEI and no doubt PNP money which they do not have to return.
Why would the Innovation Minister be so supportive of this company still and suggest that more help is on the way when they are so far in debt and are not only not paying employees but it seems don't have any customers.
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
Garth Staples from PE writes: The headline misleads again!
The stimulus delay is Obama's package, not Canadian.
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
@tired from PEI writes: Tired,
When will we be able to move on and not associate every Prince Edward Island story to PNP. Really, there is a bunch of you that whine about it every day. We know already!!!
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
enough is enough from PE writes: My sibling worked for this company, and the hardships that my sibling went through because of this business is unforgivable!
I agree that wind energy or solar energy is our future, but when a company blames economy for its shady deals in the states and allows their employees to go without food and almost get kicked out of their place of residence because of the lack of management and business skills, that company needs to be held accountable. In this case they deserve to be bankrupt!
and ..
why is it when asked, he stated... the office on Belmont street will not close, but no mention at all about the plant in Victoria.
Grow a pair! Mr. CEO and pay your employees the money they deserve
+ interest
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
JD from PE writes: @tired....
Maybe it is about time therewas a complete list of just who received PNP Money so far in the media just in the last few months there have been over 3 companies who received PNP Money already gone out of business.
How much are we as taxpayers on the hook for.
We have heard the double talk from Ghiz,Brown,Campbell, Sheridan.
Heck these guys can't even agree how much money was invested. One says $400 Million another $200 Million and yet another $180 Million how can we even be expected to believe these guys when their numbers vary by over $200 Million.
It was stated somewhere in a earlier news story that this company already received PNP Money.
Now they want more taxpayers dollars to move the company to the USA.
Why is Ghiz & Campbell even considering loaning money to these people.
Last week we saw that they loaned money to the Irvings. This was good investment we all know they will pay it back plus they have never fought of bankruptcy in court.
So why would any Government consider loaning money to a company that is near bankruptcy and didn't even pay it's employees.
Any business that has one ounce of decency,honesty or integrity always makes sure the employees get paid first.
Companies that try to scam their employees are companies who should NOT be in Business.
The Government has NO BUSINESS investing OUR Money in a company like this.
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
don't believe it from pei writes: I don't know zilch about the USA economy. But, at the risk of sounding totally insane, I don't think Canada is in the serious economic slump governments would want everyone to believe. I think it possible that we have been told of this economic slump so that when big amounts of taxdollars fly out the window towards certain projects we will be content in believing we have rescued another company and safeguarded more jobs, that we are the good fairies in luring investment advantages to the Island with our tax dollars, that we are climbing the ladder of high society by throwing ourselves and our money behind everything we are told is a vision of the future'. I believe if we were in a real economic slump the government would be holding back on some of the expenditures that are not necessary at this time. Why would we be helping pay for a tunnel across one streetcorner if we were short on cash. Yes, I do know we must keep investors happy. But the Island has to remain solvent in order to attract investment. If we are so hard up why would a megarich guy want to get so deeply involved with us. If we are slumping so badly why would we be tapped for paying for a roundabout now instead of planning that for some future time when we are more financially solid.
Why would we be creating unnecessary jobs, such as someone to speak for city councillors, on the taxpayers' dime As one citizen, when I am in debt I spend my money trying to get out. I know it is folly to go deeper. As for bringing more people into Canada via immigration my only hope is that most of them won't need social services for the first few years. After all, if we are indeed in an economic slump how can we afford to support them. Wouldn't we be holding off on those big numbers of new people until we are in a better position to help them financially. Why would we be paying a million bucks now to educate newcomers to our Island in English.
Short of money, in an economic slump - best I can say to that is Fuddle Duddle
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
expat from Idaho writes: It sounds like the company was doing OK until Mr. Heath took over as CEO. Is that correct?
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
NOTE
The management of this site emphasizes that it is in no way liable for persons, physical or legal, who are hosted here. Moreover, the managers of this site may not be held liable for errors and omissions that may slip into the information displayed in these reader comments. Everyone who submits a comment should read, understand and agree to the Terms of Usage for this section.