• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (3)
  •  

Positive news for agriculture

Published on January 14, 2013
Published on January 11, 2013
Topics :
Statistics Canada , P.E.I. Federation of Agriculture , Iceland , Maritime , Canada

 Most provinces incurred deficits after their respective rounds of spending required to buffer the Canadian economy against the global recession a few years ago. So as they struggle to balance their budgets and maintain a healthy economy, any sign of buoyancy is welcome news.

The Island's farm receipts for 2011 fit into that category.

According to Statistics Canada's most recent figures, the province's total farm receipts stood at $476 million in 2011, up by $70 million over the previous year, and almost $92 million more than 2007. These were the highest figures in the Maritimes.

Not surprisingly, the farm community is happy with the news. P.E.I. Federation of Agriculture president Bertha Campbell described it as "significant and good news both for farmers and the province."

She's right about that. Agriculture remains the underpinning of this province, as implied in the oft-quoted expression: as agriculture goes, so goes the economy. Campbell put it more specifically: "When farmers make money, they tend to keep it in circulation. They reinvest in equipment needs and infrastructure, which, in turn, leads to more jobs on P.E.I."

So what's the reason for the positive news in 2011? Industry officials say that although operating expenses grew, so did potato prices. As well, it seemed in this and other commodities, supply was more in concert with demand, and there was an increase in value of rotation crops, such as soybeans and grain. Marketing efforts also helped.

Agriculture is a complex industry with global influences often affecting farmers' bottom line. But by keeping product supply in line with the demand and marketing that product effectively, the Island agriculture industry can remain competitive. That seems to be the lesson of 2011. The challenge now is in being able to match that success in subsequent years.

 

Still debating seatbelts

The owner of a Maritime bus service is taking it upon himself to explore the pros and cons of seatbelts on his vehicles. We look forward to his findings. It could be instructive to us all.

The subject arose recently following an accident involving a Maritime Bus vehicle in Traveller's Rest, where high winds caused a motor coach bus to slide off the road and tip over. No one was seriously hurt, but reports have surfaced since the accident that some of the 33 passengers ended up with more than scrapes and bruises. One woman told The Guardian her sister suffered a concussion after being thrown from her seat.

Mike Cassidy, owner of the service, says he has given thought to putting seatbelts on his buses - in fact, the last four buses purchased by the company are equipped with them. Although the law doesn't require their enforcement on buses, he plans to examine whether they are being used.

The subject is also being discussed across Canada following the high-profile bus accident in Oregon, where nine people were killed and 38 injured when a Vancouver-bound bus left the road and plunged down an embankment. Many of the passengers were thrown from the bus.

Long before seatbelt use was legislated for personal vehicles, debate raged over whether they would save or jeopardize lives, depending on the circumstances of the accident. It looks like we may be in for a similar debate over their use in commercial vehicles. Certainly the recent bus accidents here and elsewhere have prompted people to talk about it. 

 

Comments

  • Username
    ei changes
    - January 15, 2013 at 22:47:45

    Instead of trumpeting the news with a load of corporatespeak, the PEI Federation of Agriculture should be worrying about where they're going to get their seasonal farm workers from in the future. Once EI claimants have found non-seasonal work, they won't quit those jobs for seasonal work.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      intobed
      - January 16, 2013 at 02:05:46

      The PEI Federation of Agriculture will hire seasonal workers from the least expensive group that offers it. Any company who can provide cheap labour so PEIFA members can maximize profits. Oh, according to Canadian laws, of course.

  • Username
    intobed
    - January 14, 2013 at 20:07:32

    So the farmers made more money. Now they can pay back some of the many millions given to them by the PEI taxpayers. Agriculture is not the underpinning of this province, it is the ruination of it. Dead streams and rivers, massive chemical use, and PEI now has the highest cancer rates in the country. Now they are happy the HST is being forced upon Islanders. Our way of farming must change.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Expert bloggers

Ride for Heart
Blogger
Heart and Stroke Foundation
Putting those unused gears into action
[Sponsored]

More bloggers here

The Guardian Twitter

Advertising