• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (15)

Abortion policies need to change

Published on November 18, 2011
Published on November 18, 2011
Topics :
Supreme Court of Canada , House of Commons , P.E.I. Reproductive Rights Organization , Prince Edward Island , Fredericton , Halifax

The heart-wrenching story of a 14-year-old Prince Edward Island girl who turned to desperate measures to induce an abortion highlights the need for changes in the way abortion services are delivered in the province.

For two weeks, the teen ingested chemicals, repeatedly rammed her stomach into a table, and even tried throwing herself down the stairs.

Dr. Colleen MacQuarrie, a UPEI researcher, revealed in a recent interview with this newspaper that she's shocked at the similarities in stories from women who have had, or tried to have, abortions. Many turn to self-harm, she said. "If you limit options then you create desperation, and then desperate people do things they wouldn't normally do. It's deeply disturbing."

We agree.

Prince Edward Island remains the only province that does not provide abortion services, a procedure deemed medically necessary and legal in this country since Jan. 28, 1988.

That's when the Supreme Court of Canada struck down the Criminal Code section that made it a criminal activity to perform an abortion.

Three years later, a bill passed in the House of Commons to recriminalize abortion but was defeated in the Senate.

The issue is front and centre again after a new group, the P.E.I. Reproductive Rights Organization, formed to push for changes.

The province does cover the costs of the procedure off-Island, but only when done in a hospital and only if a woman has been referred by not one but two doctors.

Women seeking an abortion must then travel to either a hospital in Halifax, or a private clinic in Fredericton, where fees can be as high as $900.

P.E.I. Health Minister Doug Currie apparently has no plans to change current abortion policies. In an interview with this newspaper, he said his stand had nothing to do with the controversial nature of the issue, but more to do with costs. Right now, he says, there's no reason to "veer off the current status."

Mr. Currie, we do see a reason to change course. It's an issue of equality.

The debate about whether abortion is right or even legal is a divisive one, but it's a debate that has already taken place. The Supreme Court has ruled. The province cannot sit back and ignore the court's ruling, or the pain and anguish that Prince Edward Island's current policies on abortion are causing.

Political pressure is now mounting on the Liberal government. Green Party Leader Sharon Labchuk calls P.E.I.'s current abortion policy a "blatant discrimination against women, especially low-income women." NDP Leader James Rodd says "over the past 30 years, both Liberal and Conservative governments have refused to support women's access to abortion."

Surprisingly, Conservative Party Leader Olive Crane, the leader of the official Opposition, has remained silent on the issue. Island voters deserve to hear from her on this important policy issue.

Other groups keeping silent at the moment are the ones representing Prince Edward Island physicians, key players in the province's health-care system.

Dr. MacQuarrie's research shows that Island women who do reach out to their family doctors in time of need don't always get it.

There are doctors who just don't give referrals. There are doctors who have refused to see patients wanting an abortion.

Kandace Hagen, an Island woman who wanted to terminate a pregnancy, discovered that first-hand: "(The doctor) told me that my only option was to go to the Morgentaler clinic in Fredericton and gave me the number and that was it. He left the room."

Incidents like that highlight the need for Prince Edward Island to modernize its abortion policies and bring them in line with the rest of the country.

          

 

Comments

  • Username
    Meaghan Noel
    - November 20, 2011 at 19:43:01

    The only person that should be deciding if abortion is "right", is the woman considering it. In no way should this be a decision by government, religious peoples or anti abortion groups. Abortion should be available to Islanders, like it is to the rest of Canadians. If PEI is already covering the cost for islanders to travel to another provence to have the procedure done isn't that a clear sign that the government already condones abortions? The issue, as it appears to me, is not weather the government agrees with abortions, but how we can make room for abortion in our healthcare budget.

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      JackieM
      - November 21, 2011 at 22:05:57

      Just to make a point while not giving an opinion. If you call pro abortion Pro Choice, than please do not call Pro Life anti Abortion. Just don't change terms because it fits your lovely boxed world of political correctness.

  • Username
    thegeneral
    - November 19, 2011 at 22:16:17

    Abortion! Isn't that like saying it's OK TO KILL YOUR CHILD? How did we get here as a society. It is not OK to kil a newborn baby, so why is it OK to kill a baby when its in the mothers womb? Many years ago politicians and educators told us we'd be so much better off if we just allowed SEX EDUCATION in our schools. Well it is there now and has been for a long time. Has sex education been useful and curved disease and unwanted births. NO! There are more babies born to unwed mothers than every before. And for the person who thinks single parents raise Mal Adjuster children, perhaps you have not been reading scientific articles. Many with dual parents are Mal adjusted, and drug addicted. Just because you have one parent does not mean you're Mal adjusted. Just take a quick look around, many children from dual-professional families are Mal Adjusted. I don't want my tax dollars going towards killing unborn babies. In our socieity we call that murder, not abortion. If you don't want to become pregnant then use the condom, or other birth control methods. But please don't kill the baby. Babies don't ask to be born, therefore it is the parents responsiblity to keep the unborn and born babies safe. Please those in favor of abortion, go see a shrink.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    That Guy From PEI
    - November 18, 2011 at 22:58:03

    First....all men should be EXCLUDED from this debate (coming from a man) Second, how can anyone have this much control over A women's body? The person who said for "them to keep their legs shut" should practise keeping their mouth shut for such ignorant comments....

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      sciencebased
      - November 19, 2011 at 09:23:37

      So sad you talk of ignorance and not realize women absolutely cannot get pregnant alone. In the same vain why is it that I had to get my wife to ok my vasectomy when I was under 30? Life to be created in a scientific sense requires material from both males and females. I cannot help wonder what would be the result if the biological Fathers were allowed to say they would take the Child after it was born the mother would have to give birth in a consensual sense, I wonder if that would change attitudes and would women approach reproduction differently. I only wonder this because if women decides to keep the child the father is legally obligated to support it? I think cutting males out of the conversation is a mistake. Look where we are at as a society now? Single moms, dead beat dads, mal adjusted children that are bullying each other in a virtual world.

  • Username
    Get With The Times
    - November 18, 2011 at 22:56:49

    Let me start by saying, people need to stop saying that the only good reason to have an abortion is if you've been raped or sexually assaulted. Whether you like it or not, sex is a natural part to life and to say you should stop it entirely is unfair. So many women have become pregnant even through the use of birth control (condoms, the pill, diaphragm, depo-provera ect). There are many reasons a woman should be allowed to get an abortion, such as financial instability, mental illness, physical illness, age, and yes if the child was conceived through sexual assault. The mere fact that a woman is just not ready to have a child is enough of a reason. I've experianced first hand how it feels to be pregnant by complete accident. I am young, making minimum wage and a student. This was a complete shock to me. I became depressed because I was not myself. I was lucky enough to get a doctor to refer me for the clinic in Halifax, but my road was not easy. I dealt with doctors treating me unfairly. When I went to get my ultrasound, the doctor refused to let the father, who helped me through the whole process, come with me. The hospital lost my blood samples not once, but twice and they did not seem sorry about it. I am currently due for a uterine examination, but when I went, the doctor refused to examine me for a few more weeks. She had to consult with another doctor to get information on the procedure after an abortion, and still came back with incorrect information that conflicted with what the experts at the clinic where I got my abortion had told me. I feel that another issue needs to be addressed here. If our government refuses to change the abortion access on the island, they should at the very least provide the necessary information to women and doctors. They should encourage physicians to refer more women and pay for travel cost and accommodations since they refuse to provide the necessary services to island women. It's time we all get our minds out of the early twentieth century and into the twenty-first century. We are the last province in Canada to get with the times and provide access to women everywhere.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Jennifer Jenkins
    - November 18, 2011 at 22:55:49

    It never ceases to amaze me of the bias of The Guardian newspaper. They claim they give both sides of an issue but this is not always the case. One issue is the abortion issue. There have been a lot of letters on rights of women, rights of over choice, recognizing women’s reproductive rights etc... Need I go on? You bet I do! What about the rights of the unborn child? Who will give voice to this small life? Yes, it is a life upon conception. People will try to dehumanize it by calling this life a fetus. The article, entitled: “Recognizing women’s reproductive rights”, that was published on November 12 was touching in regards to Remembrance Day. I would however, disagree with the fact, “....that in 2011 women’s reproductive rights on P.E.I. are still being ignored,” according to Gail Rhyno letter to the editor. You have a right to have a baby, but please take responsibility from conception to birth. I had a friend who was very brave and gave her baby up for adoption. She chose life for her baby. I supported her throughout the whole process. Our government is ignoring the issue somewhat because we as taxpayers are already paying for off island abortions. The silent majority appears to be overshadowed by the loud few. I hope this letter makes you think about taken a stand for life or against life. You decide!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Equal is
    - November 18, 2011 at 15:14:02

    I wish they would finish the sentences in regards to this matter and come out with facts. How many Islanders are leaving the province for this service? How many are due to non-consensual situations? How many are under 18? How many are 18-25? If there was only one 14 year old is that substantiation to change the system? There are a number of persons hoping this is given the green light to go ahead. They are all the other Islanders who have to receive numerous referrals to go to Halifax, Moncton, Saint John and Montreal for medical proceedures with mostly no or little support from the Provincial side. In my humble estimation this in a strictly medical proceedural sense they cannot change this dynamic financially. I have been out of province twice this year for medical services alone. There are services that are provided for me here that if I have to access will cost me in the tens of thousands. Health PEI will not start handing out bridge passes and claim to all of the clients going to the main land. They will tell you to claim it on your taxes. Now to address this "my right" claim. The service is provided through a referral service so please stop misdirecting. I do have a challenge in giving support to this only in the sense the biological father is not considered. In a consenual sense, if the women wants an abortion and the Father does not want. She can press on and terminate without his concent or input. I am baffle by the logic behind if she decides to go to term and have the child and he was opposed why is he then made to be financially responsible? I am neither for or against abortion. I have lived long enough where I have seen good and bad application of this medical proceedure. No one is being arrested or detained for having abortions in this situation. No one is saying it is illegal to have one. There is too much hyperbole. If Dr. MacQuarrie's research is showing there are far too many 14 year olds in this Province who are getting pregnant is abortion the answer? Does the reasearch show sever communication break downs with teenagers and the parents are leading to and abundance self harm? Is the research and the goal geared just to bring the service to the Island? Is it study Peer Reviewed? My last question would be in the heirarchy of needs in our medical system, would this take presidence over other proceedures in the medical system at present that another service will be sent to the mainland in order for this to be a service offered here along with just shifting cost to another group?

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    use common sense
    - November 18, 2011 at 15:12:28

    If people are so concerned about abortions and not wanting to have kids there is a lot of other methods out there, for one how about try keeping your legs shut. an abortion should only be permitted if a girl was sexually assualted because then she would not have consented to the act. Just like everything else in life for every action there is a list of possible outcomes. And whether or not you use protection or what not if yoou feel the need to perform the act then you need to learn to live with the results. How about we use the provinces money towards something useful such as education, or health care for the terminally ill.

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      CF
      - November 18, 2011 at 22:58:08

      @USE COMMON SENSE- Nobody is asking for you to have an abortion. People are allowed to be sexually active, and forcing them to have children by denying them access to a legal medical procedure as punishment is draconian. Women, no matter what age, should not have to "justify" their actions by admitting to sexual assault if they choose not to. To do so makes them a victim twofold. Additionally, it is disrespectful to the sanctity of life to essentially categorize it as punishment. Your reasoning is that people should be made to own up to their sexual behavior. That is precisely what abortion is for. I have never spoken to anyone who had an abortion and liked it. Sometimes it is necessary. Unless a person is very disturbed, I get the impression it's never a good time. I am fortunate enough to not ever have to make that choice, as I am a man, but I will not discount, judge or try to prevent women from making that choice, and you should not either. Through discourse, or otherwise.

  • Username
    Confused
    - November 18, 2011 at 15:12:01

    I fail to see how this costs too much money to provide here on PEI, you are already paying for the women to have the procedure done somewheres else, and if they don't receive the abortion you are paying to support the child for 18 years because most women who get abortions do it out the necessity that they cannot afford to support a child therefore end up on welfare. The research also shows that those children who end up in the welfare system, a good portion of them turn to a life of crime, so you end up paying for that as well. The government needs to start looking at all these costs as well.

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      james gallant
      - November 18, 2011 at 20:06:13

      dear confused to use abortion to save cost or to keep these women from a life of crime. you are confused

  • Username
    Financially Concerned
    - November 18, 2011 at 12:59:00

    Thank you for mentioning that the province already pays for abortions. A lot of Islanders seem unaware of this fact, and I think the provincial government is using that as a reason to say "It costs too much". If you want to make it a financial issue- lets give the jobs to Islanders that we're currently outsourcing to Nova Scotia. Bring the funds back to the Island and into Islanders pockets . The QEC has the equipment and the staff already.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Seriously Folks
    - November 18, 2011 at 12:21:40

    Thank you for this thoughtful piece. Abortions happen - they always have and they always will. Since 1988 they have been legal and the only task that remains is for PEI to make them safe and accessible. It will be less expensive and more compassionate to provide this service on PEI. 23 years is a long time to wait.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    nancy
    - November 18, 2011 at 12:20:44

    Very well stated. It's so sad that so many people are turning this into a moral/religious debate. We must remember what this group is fighting for. To need two doctor referals for any medical service on P.E.I. is nearly impossible. The only reason to have this criteria is to act as a further barrier to women who are seeking abortions, a barrier tht is not in place in any other province in this country. Equal access is the issue here.

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Guardian is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Expert bloggers

Ride for Heart
Blogger
Heart and Stroke Foundation
Preparation is key
[Sponsored]

More bloggers here

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

The Guardian Twitter

Advertising