• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (15)
  •  

Gulf oil development big concern for group fearing damage to ecosystem, P.E.I. economy

Linda Coles of Suffolk, signs a petition calling for a ban on oil development in the Gulf of St. Lawrence. With her are Andrew Lush and Colin Jeffrey, members of the Save Our Seas and Shores Colaition P.E.I Chapter, which is sponsoring the petition that will be presented to the the P.E.I. legislature. It was at the farmers market in Charlottetown.   Guardian photo by Brian McInnis

Linda Coles of Suffolk, signs a petition calling for a ban on oil development in the Gulf of St. Lawrence. With her are Andrew Lush and Colin Jeffrey, members of the Save Our Seas and Shores Colaition P.E.I Chapter, which is sponsoring the petition...

Published on March 20, 2013
Published on March 20, 2013
Brian McInnis  RSS Feed
Topics :
Island East Tourism Group , Seas and Shores Coalition P.E.I. Chapter , Prince Edward Island , Newfoundland , Island East

Oil development in the Gulf of St. Lawrence is a growing concern for environmentalists as well as some business sectors, especially tourism, and in fact the Island East Tourism Group is following the issue closely because an oil spill could have disastrous impact on tourism.

Doug Deacon, chair of the group, says the group has discussed the issue at a recent board meeting and one member has been closely following the file.

"One of the issues for the board of directors is the liability for the tourism industry that an oil spill might represent ... and it is a valid concern to be addressed as an industry.''

He said the board is worried that many operators do not have liability insurance in case of a spill or some other issue associated with offshore drilling.

The Island East Tourism Group manages the Points East Coastal Drive from Stratford to Souris.

A petition is being circulated by Save our Seas and Shores Coalition P.E.I. Chapter opposing offshore oil and gas drilling in the gulf which will be presented to the P.E.I. legislature. It has been in circulation since January and has about 600 signatures.

"Because what they are doing is offshore oil development, but in the gulf which is not really an offshore area and the ecosystem is so sensitive and the tourism industry is so dependent upon the gulf being clean and the contingencies they are putting in place for an oil spill are so inadequate...it is just a case of money and oil pushing through against all other concerns," said Andrew Lush, a member of the coalition.

He said Prince Edward Island will not receive any benefit from the drilling because it is being managed out of Newfoundland.

Lush said that if development is allowed to go ahead the large number of leases in the gulf mean it will be a matter of when, and not if, a spill occurs.

"It (the oil spill) will just swirl around because it takes eight months to flush out the gulf and it will pollute our beaches and estuaries and it (is) just an unacceptable risk."

Having said that, he clarified that his group is not against offshore development.

"It's just that the gulf is not an offshore region and it is so important for tourism, fisheries and for the ecosystem there should not be oil development there."

Save our Seas and Shores is a group consisting of people from New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland and Quebec. He said opposition is particularly strong in the Iles de la Madeleine which is close to the proposed Old Harry development.

Lush said there has been no environmental assessment carried out, but there has been a strategic environmental review done, which he said was basically a farce.

"It was just a show of what they were doing and they were not taking any serious feedback nor doing any presentations so we are extremely concerned this is going to go ahead. As you know the federal government is weakening the environmental assessment process so unfortunately they have put money and oil above the health of the environment."

 

Comments

  • Username
    Wages
    - March 22, 2013 at 02:56:23

    Just to let PEI Know on a AHTS we have 12 crew working month on/off with a combined wage of 2.1 million a year,each rig needs at least 2-4 vessels,not including logistis,food etc,time to get with the program,keep our people here

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    North Sea Master
    - March 22, 2013 at 00:45:22

    I can see the fear of Islanders,mostly when change occurs.However with Tourist and Fishing heading south we need another option to keep young people on Pei,if not PEI will be a vacant Island dependant on Government hand outs. I work in the north sea,where safety is tops in the world,sure you have the odd mishape,like in the GOM but percentage wise with all the oil pumped world wide it is very low. Why see our labour force having to travel to Alberta when high paying oil jobs can be had off our own shores/ It was not that long ago that the end of the world was near when the fixed link was built,as a Islander we have to adapt,if oil is explored the benefits would mean a world of difference to the PEI economy. I would love nothing more than sail my AHTS into Charlottetown for a load of oil equipment,anchors etc. If people knew the wages to be made they would all be behind this venture. As far as the fear mongers they will always be present no matter what topic is brought up

    Submit a comment

  • Bill Kays
    Bill Kays
    - March 21, 2013 at 12:31:48

    What a foolish comment. YOU CANNOT DRINK OIL. Why would I want to trade short term profit now for the death of our fishing, farming, and tourism industries. I know, you have money in your pocket so you think you are ok. Your money means nothing compared to our unrenewable water resource. Anyway, this province is SO DESPERATE FOR MONEY, they will do anything. ANYTHING. They have already made their deal(s) with the devil.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Jocelyn Plourde
    - March 20, 2013 at 18:56:05

    I think it is very important to point out that the opposition to drilling for oil and gas in the Gulf of St-Lawrence is not just coming from tourism and groups such as Save our Seas and Shores. The fishing industry is concerned. The scientific community is concerned. We all should be concerned. If we want to get energy our of the Gulf of St-Lawrence, lets install wind turbines there! It's out of the way so people won't complain about the vibrations. There is no harm to the ecosystems (other than during installation but this is a ridiculously small impact compared to drilling for oil). And if something goes wrong with a wind turbine, all you get is a big "splash".

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    don
    - March 20, 2013 at 18:30:58

    do you really think your petition means anything? nfld cares less for anything but MONEY.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Newfoundlander
      - March 20, 2013 at 22:25:16

      Don, you really should give more thought to your comments. With the statement you made, you clearly have no idea of what most Newfoundlanders care about. We are in the midst of trying our hardest to put a halt on any hydraulic fracturing on our beautiful west coast this spring. It's probably going to go ahead anyway, but not with our blessing. We have petitions of our own going on. We're trying to make more people aware of the risks and dangers of this controversial technique. To say we care less for anything but money, when our land, our water, our bays, our coastal environment, our health and well-being, and our children's futures are at risk, couldn't be further from the truth. Get on the case of the oil companies and the politicians, but not the people. We love our Island every bit as much as the people of PEI love theirs!

    • Username
      celine parent
      - March 21, 2013 at 22:21:18

      The PEI petition is a very good thing. Other petition are being signed around the Gulf, by people from les Iles de la Madeleine, from Saint Lawrence Coalition. People who care for the preservation of the Gulf, from Quebec, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, PEI (and there are some people from Nfld too) should stand together and say it loud.

  • Username
    Travellin ironworker
    - March 20, 2013 at 18:04:55

    I'd say start drilling. Too bad our government wouldn't start supporting oil and gas exploration.in reality what are the chances of a major spill. Everyone complains of the current ei changes. That would be our ticket out off the ei culture. The majority that complain of the changes to ei are the fishermen and the seasonal tourism operators. You can't have your cake and eat it too. I'd say start drilling, it will get a lot of our guys back home and get the economy rolling, finally!!

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      UPWESTER
      - March 21, 2013 at 18:20:08

      Ever hear of the Gulf of Mexico? British Petroleum? If you think it can't happen here, you are mistaken.Picture the people of Florida, Louisianna,Mississippi and Texas walking in oil on the beach, then transfer that image to PEI.Look at the damage the Irving Whale made,now picture oil spilling onto our lobster,crab and other fish grounds.Crab couldn't be fished around the Irving Whale for twenty years, and most of that oil was still inside the ship. What cost prosperity?

  • Username
    BP OIL SPILL RING ANY BELLS PEOPLE
    - March 20, 2013 at 18:03:54

    Lest we forget LOUSIANNA folks!!! check out this documentary if you have forgotten on Netflix for free. "THE BIG FIX"

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Andrew Lush
    - March 20, 2013 at 17:37:36

    Here is the petition: http://peiwatershedalliance.org/web/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Petiton.pdf and here is the website: http://saveourseasandshores.ca

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    one exception
    - March 20, 2013 at 16:06:09

    Andrew Lush says ''... Prince Edward Island will not receive any benefit from the drilling because it is being managed out of Newfoundland... '' That may be true in terms of direct benefit but until PEI stops accepting federal equalization and transfer payments, it does receive the indirect benefit of oil production in Newfoundland.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    ?
    - March 20, 2013 at 14:26:27

    "He said Prince Edward Island will not receive any benefit from the drilling because it is being managed out of Newfoundland" Well considering 1/2 the people on the island have to travel to Alberta to work in the oil/gas industry (since you cant get a decent wage here and there are no jobs) and that is on the other side of Canada, I would think if islanders could trave to NFLD TO WORK which is a lot closer, it probably would benefit PEI

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Stewart Smith
      - March 20, 2013 at 17:47:26

      So there will be a few jobs for Islanders? That's OK then. Wait a minute - what about the damage to the tourism and fishing industries, and the environment? It is not a price worth paying for a few short-term jobs.

  • Username
    No Way
    - March 20, 2013 at 14:20:57

    A petition with 600 signatures is not much. I haven't seen any petition about this going around. Put it up on Facebook and get it circulating. I'm sure there are many more people who sign this one if they knew about it.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Expert bloggers

Ride for Heart
Blogger
Heart and Stroke Foundation
Putting those unused gears into action
[Sponsored]

More bloggers here

The Guardian Twitter

Advertising