• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (8)
  •  

Rain, snowmelt cause problems at Plan B site

The stream in the hemlock grove was diverted underground until the culvert is completed and then it will be allowed to flow through it. File photo Guardian photo by Brian McInnis

The stream in the hemlock grove was diverted underground until the culvert is completed and then it will be allowed to flow through it. File photo

Published on March 18, 2013
Published on March 18, 2013
Ryan Ross  RSS Feed
Topics :
Trans Canada Highway , Environment Department , Transportation Department , Churchill

Extra environmental controls have been added to the Trans Canada Highway realignment known as Plan B after heavy rains and snow melt caused problems at the construction site last week.

Jay Carr, an environmental assessment officer with the Environment Department, said part of the problem was the 35 mm of rain in a six-hour period, along with snow melt.

“There was a lot of water that went down in a relatively short timeframe,” he said.

The rain led to washouts and overflowing silt traps that were supposed to hold up under a one-in-25-year event.

But recent rains weren’t the first time environmental protection measures didn’t hold up and several silt fences have needed repairs or improvements to protect nearby waterways.

With the latest problems, Carr said the biggest issue was a washout at the former Encounter Creek site near Churchill where a dam holding back a diverted stream let go.

“A big gush of water came down and went through the culvert,” he said.

The rushing water didn’t follow the streambed it was supposed to and overwhelmed a sediment trap, he said.

Carr said the contractor was rebuilding the sediment trap and fixing the streambed to make sure the water follows the right path.

Sediment traps are designed to collect runoff in a pool where any sediment settles to the bottom and is eventually emptied to make room for more.

Carr said most of the sediment traps at the construction site are getting full and they will be cleared out soon.

“They’ve done their job,” he said.

Environmental monitors are supposed to be at the site regularly to make sure all the proper environmental protections are in place.

Carr said monitors have been on site during days when the weather required it or there was snowmelt.

Extra control measures have been put in place and more could be on the way if necessary, Carr said.

He also said recent cold weather has made it easier for crews to fix some of the problems than it might otherwise have been when the ground was softer.

“It would have to be done but it would just be more difficult,” he said.

The Plan B site wasn’t the only place where flooding caused problems and the Transportation Department closed several roads last week.

That includes Route 6 in Oyster Bed Bridge, where the road is closed for the next few days and Route 224 where work is expected to take about six weeks to finish.

Route 6 in Cavendish was closed temporarily but has since re-opened.

rross@theguardian.pe.ca

twitter.com/ryanrross

Comments

  • Bill Kays
    Bill Kays
    - March 19, 2013 at 17:51:18

    Some may want to blame the experts but the blame falls squarely on ROBERT GHIZ and his mismanagent team called the government. Rather than get great consulting and really expert advice they went for the most expensive patronage way to do things. Public tenders are a laugh on PEI as we all know who gets them before they are even read, never mind AWARDED. What are wec up to now, PLAN K or PLAN L or PLAN M, because this government knows it has free will to its own will, citizens be damned. The next government should firstly throw out the HST, then immediately start to reverse the protectionist legislations passed by the GHIZNEYLAND government.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Who Knew?
    - March 19, 2013 at 14:37:22

    OMG it is endless BS from these "experts". 35mm of rain? snow melts? Who knew that might happen? Obviously not these stalwarts of engineering expertise! Carr says the sediment traps are getting full!! They have been above the critical level that should have initiated clean out weeks ago according to EPP but were not. Then we have a one in one month event and everything blows to hell.. Imagine a 1 in 25 year event! They seem clueless and it is so frustrating to see these after-the-fact "mitigations and improvements". These should have all been done long ago in anticipation of these normal and "expected" events, not playing it by ear as we go!! Carr says "The rushing water didn’t follow the streambed it was supposed to.." well next time, let the water know! He continues ".. and overwhelmed a sediment trap," yet soon after says "They've done their job"??? Carr said most of the sediment traps at the construction site are getting full and they will be cleared out soon.?? well, most of them overflowed or were blown completely out with mud/silt water flowing around them into the streams so they did not do their job and should be cleaned out and re-established NOW, not soon! "Environmental monitors are supposed to be at the site regularly to make sure all the proper environmental protections are in place". Well, apart from very rare appearances by tax-paid gov't monitors, the only monitors consistently on the site are the public volunteers without whom likely none of these disasters would even be known about. Plan B blunders on in the way we have come to expect from day one...incompetently and wastefully. Stop it now before the big bucks are spent - save the $$ and put them into something truly useful to society or just don't spend it and help the deficit.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Rita J
    - March 19, 2013 at 11:53:30

    Why is the Guardian using a file photo? Show the real mess this Government has made.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Just Sayin
    - March 19, 2013 at 11:45:27

    I bet if one those good liberals homes was threatened by the silt and water their mitigations would be quite different from the ones in place in Bonshaw. The idiocy of this project never ceases to amaze me. Why do we have regular citizens out there monitoring the work without being paid. For gad sake, they could at least provide them with a few hard hats and some equipment to do the job, since it appears nobody else is doing it.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Nestor
    - March 19, 2013 at 10:22:13

    The price of patronage.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Shocker
    - March 19, 2013 at 08:16:38

    So giant silt wash outs damaging waterways. The rivers and ocens only provides a livlihood for many in the fishing industry, so no big deal right? As long as we have highway realignments that are not needed. No sense spending provincial money on health care and education. Our children don't need things like computers and internet in their schools, even though most other provinces in the country have them in all the schools. Well done Ghiz government. You make me proud.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Upperdunker
    - March 19, 2013 at 06:21:32

    The sanctimonious Stantec consultants and the "expert" provincial engineers that backed Plan B with all the "mitigations in place" are environmentally illiterate. This mess they have created proves the point. And the reporter here doesn't even mention the 24 hour on site monitoring by the concerned citizens there; wouldn't they have insights to add to Jay Carr's government biased words. Plan B just continues to disgust Islanders.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    as predicted?
    - March 18, 2013 at 22:55:31

    Those who are fighting the idiocy of Plan B have continued to ask the hard question: Why is the tax-payer's money for infrastructure not being spent where it's most needed? The rain may be caused by God but the flood damage is not caused by God. The damage is caused by a lack of human foresight and a lack of political will to address the problem though engineering. Engineers know where the problems are and we know where damage will likely occur in the future. In many ways, the villain here is the 30 million plus dollars being spent in Bonshaw. The problem is not God, not provincial engineers, not the people who have been devastated by flood damage, and not the tax payers who carry the burden of this unnecessary project. The problem rests with the decision makers who enabled this foolish and wasteful project to move forward.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Expert bloggers

Ride for Heart
Blogger
Heart and Stroke Foundation
Putting those unused gears into action
[Sponsored]

More bloggers here

The Guardian Twitter

Advertising