• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (17)
  •  

Drunk driving summit gets results

Chief Paul Smith, and Susan MacAskill, MADD Atlantic Region, discuss ways to reduce impaired driving on Island roads. A one-day summit was held at the Charlottetown Hotel Friday, focusing on solutions that be implemented by the Department of Transportation and Infrastructure Renewal to reduce instances of impaired driving. Guardian photo

Chief Paul Smith, and Susan MacAskill, MADD Atlantic Region, discuss ways to reduce impaired driving on Island roads. A one-day summit was held at the Charlottetown Hotel Friday, focusing on solutions that be implemented by the Department of...

Published on February 13, 2013
Published on February 13, 2013
Ryan Ross  RSS Feed
Topics :
MADD Canada , Transportation Department , Prince Edward Island , Charlottetown
Strengthening the province's laws when it comes to driving while impaired by drugs was one of the priorities that came out of a summit held in Charlottetown Wednesday.

Transportation Minister Robert Vessey, whose department organized the summit, said driving while impaired by drugs is a growing problem across the country and the province will be looking at ways to curb it.

That could include highway safety officers getting training to identify people who are impaired so they could help police to deal with the issue, Vessey said.

"We have to get things around that."

Vessey joined Justice Minister Janice Sherry and representatives from MADD Canada, addictions services, Island police forces and several government departments for a one-day summit in Charlottetown Wednesday.

The summit was meant to look at solutions the Transportation Department can implement to reduce drunk driving in P.E.I.

It appears to have done just that.

Vessey said the province will be releasing a report based on what was discussed during the summit.

"There will be changes coming in the legislation through the Highway Traffic Act," he said.

The provincial government already took steps in the fall to beef up the Highway Traffic Act when it comes to drunk driving, including mandatory use of the ignition interlock for all offenders.

Vessey said there were a lot of different topics discussed Wednesday, including possibly requiring vehicles to have a licence plate on the front, which they currently don't in P.E.I.

The possibility of requiring repeat offenders to use a coloured licence plate was previously suggested and Vessey said it came up again during the summit.

"That's definitely still on the table for repeat offenders."

Vessey said everyone at the summit agreed to meet again in six months to continue the discussions.

Andrew Murie, MADD Canada's CEO, flew in for the summit and said the participants had a great discussion about the issues surrounding impaired driving.

Murie said the people involved seemed willing to listen, including the two cabinet ministers who part of the discussion and he felt there will be legislative and non-legislative changes made as a result.

"I think at the end of the day everybody wins because there will be less deaths and injuries due to impaired driving on Prince Edward Island," he said.

The province's push to get people to call 911 to report drunk drivers was one the examples Murie gave of something the summit addressed and he said there was agreement it should be expanded.

In P.E.I. it is illegal to talk on a cellphone while driving, but the province has made an exception for people who call 911 to report drunk drivers.

Vessey also said the 911 program was a reoccurring theme in many discussions during the summit and many thought the province could do a better job of promoting it through signage and education.

"I think that's a tool that we have that we may not be utilizing as much as we could," he said.

Murie said it was unusual to see the type of involvement from cabinet ministers who took part in the summit and he left feeling things were going to happen.

"It just wasn't another meeting," he said.

rross@theguardian.pe.ca

twitter.com/ryanrross

 

Comments

  • Username
    Paradigm shift
    - February 15, 2013 at 00:41:44

    it is time to stop focusing on punishing people and start going after the advertisers and manufacturers of alcohol who continue to promote alcohol abuse as a fun and worthwhile past time. Much like tobacco, ALL advertising of alcohol based products and sponsorships should be outlawed and the whole practice of drinking demonized just like smokers...

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      The Facilitator
      - February 16, 2013 at 00:46:13

      90% of those that consume alcohol do it responsibly, so why do you want to blame the manufacturers when the fault lies with those who abuse the product? It is time that individuals take responsibility for their bad decisions and stop blaming others.

  • Username
    MEJ
    - February 14, 2013 at 10:37:57

    Enforcement and stiffer fines etc are fine, after the fact, There is nothing stopping the individual from getting behind the wheel again and again after serving his sentence. What we need to focus on is PREVENTATIVE actions. How do we stop the impaired driver from becoming another statistic, and keep them off the roads in the first place. If an interlock system does not allow a car to be started if you have alcohol in you blood, then why aren't all cars equipped with these or some sort of device similar?

    Submit a comment

  • Bill Kays
    Bill Kays
    - February 14, 2013 at 10:19:46

    Drinking and driving is wrong and we all know it. Our drunk driving stats are on the decline so obviously what we are doing is working. It seems that most of the drunk drivers these days are repeat offenders. So be very careful not to give away any of our precious rights in this QUEST TO CONTROL HUMAN BEHAVIOR (drunk driving). Know that like bullying it is in our very nature to sin and I doubt if we can legislate it away, but we can legislate our civil rights away as we have been doing incrementally for over 40 years.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Dorthy
    - February 14, 2013 at 09:08:33

    How about a summit on why people who drink and drive get more Jail time then people who commit violent and sexual crimes here on PEI!!!!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    TARANTAU
    - February 14, 2013 at 09:02:41

    As apart of their sentence have convicted drunk drivers travel to Island schools and speak to students.We all know how the majority love public speaking , at the same time if you reach just one young person then it's a success.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Marie
    - February 14, 2013 at 08:47:51

    Missing the reason why a front license plate will help determine whether a drunk driver is behind the wheel. We don't have a front plate in Ontario, but they still catch impaired drivers!! Hope that's not the "big plan" to reduce it. I too agree with doing away with weekend time and double credit for time served. As an old friend used to say, "You do the crime, you do the time."

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Andrew
      - February 14, 2013 at 10:12:09

      Front plate is just another way of sneaking more money out of us at the registery. That's the only reason.....

  • Username
    Resident
    - February 14, 2013 at 08:38:11

    The PEI problem is a lack of real enforcement. I know of a case where police drove drunk driver home, instead of charging the person with DWI offence. I also witnessed first hand a police officer refusing to perform breathalyser test on one party in the accident. Because the enforcement is "selective" in nature, people will continue to drive under the influence...

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    judge judy
    - February 14, 2013 at 08:27:10

    The people seem to be doing their part, reporting these drivers when they see them. The police are doing a great job at catching them when they are alerted to them. The only ones that seem to not be doing their part is the courts. These drivers are getting off with "a slap on the wrist" time and time again. If we are serious about putting an end to impaired driving, we need to impose some major fines and jail time to make people think twice about driving drunk. We can talk about it all we want but unless there is action, the problem isn't going to go away

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Time for a A more Mature Approach
    - February 14, 2013 at 07:27:17

    The snag, bag, blame and shame strategy may be necessary, but clearly it's insufficient. It's also time to attack this problem by increasing restorative justice and getting to the root of why it's happening: absence of empathy. In this, we need to require our education system to build it into the curriculum. One thing for sure, if we keep doing the same thing, we're going to get the same results.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      W.Wilkins
      - February 14, 2013 at 10:49:03

      Cowards victimize. And cowards usually require one or all of three things to do damage: Weapons, alcohol and ignorance. Weapons are designed to destroy; they have absolutely no other purpose. Alcohol is a dangerous drug and when used inappropriately it's a killer. Ignorance denies the last two sentences. Until we cure the type of ignorance that enables cowardice we're going to have violence. Because I'm a man, I can only speak as a man. But, I think it's time to grow some smarts, eh?

  • Username
    hopeful
    - February 14, 2013 at 01:04:06

    The idea that they are getting serious about drunk driving is encouraging . Before any progress can be made in this area there must be an inclusion of those who are impaired by the use of drugs. Both are equally dangerous when driving under the influence .The police need to have the assistance of the public and of the courts, Since the the government is making record profits from the sale of liquor they must be prepared to use some of that money in curtailing this criminal action of a few selfish people. There is a misconception of a DUI that there be a sentence based on the amount of liquor one has in their system . There should no difference what so ever. We have to stop the allowing those who had just few and got caught getting a light sentence and those who blow higher a have sentence. The message has to be a little amount will get dealt with just as severely . I do hope that this Minster has the backing of his boss on this one.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    don
    - February 13, 2013 at 23:14:23

    a few ideas and i know lots will disagree with me. but forget this dumb ideas of serving time on weekends. and start clamping down by making the fines for 1st timers to start at $1,000.00 you lose your licence for one year, and 30 days in jail straight time. 2nd time double the fines etc. then if you kill "murder" a fellow human then you get no less then 50 years and a day in jail. send the message WE WILL NO LONGER STAND FOR DRUNKS ON OUR ROADS.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Willie Wonka
    - February 13, 2013 at 21:51:06

    Seize their vehicles---.08 and over----seize them, sell them and give the money to MADD. Drunk drivers can be taken off the roads if the so called legal system of today really wanted to and they know it. Sure would be a lot less jobs in the legal system though if that happened. Maybe that is the problem.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Just wondering
      - February 14, 2013 at 10:07:20

      How do you sell a vehicle that for the most part is owned by the bank? Or a leaseing agent? I think there would still be plenty of jobs still available in the legal system cleaning up this suggestion....

    • Username
      To Just Wondering
      - February 14, 2013 at 10:59:43

      You sell the car and the person convicted of drunk driving still needs to pay the bank.

    • Username
      Just wondering
      - February 14, 2013 at 11:21:13

      And if they don't pay it back, how does the lender get there money back? Repo the car from the people who bought it at auction? I'm by no means an expert but I'm sure when we buy or lease a vehicle there is a lean on it by the lender till its payed off.

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Expert bloggers

Ride for Heart
Blogger
Heart and Stroke Foundation
Let's go ride a bike
[Sponsored]

More bloggers here

The Guardian Twitter

Advertising