• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (29)
  •  

Summit seeks 'made-in-P.E.I. solution' to impaired driving problem

Impaired driving

Impaired driving

Published on January 31, 2013
Published on January 31, 2013
Topics :
Department of Transportation and Infrastructure Renewal , RCMP , Addiction Services , Prince Edward Island , Charlottetown

Transportation Minister Robert Vessey says Prince Edward Island needs a “made-in-P.E.I. solution” for the problem of impaired driving.

Vessey’s Department of Transportation and Infrastructure Renewal will be bringing together local leaders and decision-makers to develop ways to help combat impaired driving on Island roads.

“Impaired driving happens far too often on our roads and needlessly puts Islanders’ lives at risk,” said the minister.

The one-day summit will be held Feb. 13 in Charlottetown and include representatives of the Department of Transportation and Infrastructure Renewal, RCMP, municipal police forces, MADD Canada and local chapters, Addiction Services, and the Department of Environment, Labour and Justice.

Vessey said the summit will focus on tangible, effective solutions that can be implemented by the Department of Transportation and Infrastructure Renewal to reduce instances of impaired driving and keep impaired drivers off Island roads.

The summit follows changes made in the fall to the Highway Traffic Act to stiffen penalties for impaired drivers. These changes, which will be proclaimed into law in the coming days, include mandatory participation in the ignition inter-lock program for all convicted impaired drivers and tougher vehicle impoundment penalties.

Vessey says the changes make P.E.I.’s legislation among the most progressive in the country.

“As minister responsible for highway safety, I recognize our good work can’t stop here. We must continue to do more to stop people from driving after drinking or taking drugs. This will best be achieved when we work together with all partners, and I look forward to hearing the ideas that will be shared at the summit.”

Comments

  • Username
    Thunder
    - February 1, 2013 at 23:38:27

    I feel the stricter laws aren't going to impact drinking and driving at all. So what now impaired drivers need to put a mandatory Breathalyzer in there car and lose there licence for a longer period of time good luck with getting people to comply with that when most impaired drivers continue to drive anyways. You are all funny to think that stiffer laws will decrease this problem seriously though you all make me laugh. Rather then spending time on deciding how to stiffen laws why don't you use this time to educate the youth on the dangers of drinking and driving.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Danielle
    - February 1, 2013 at 20:33:26

    So, this article is not talking about drinking and driving causing injury. It is talking about those luck ones who don't hurt anyone, this time. If they injury or kill someone they will in most cases be charged with vehicular manslaughter, which I believe is 10yrs in prison. So ignore them in this scenario. We can't publish there names in newspapers or on radio, that's actually a violation of the individuals rights. I know they broke the law but how many of you have gotten a speeding ticket or parking ticket? Everyone at some point in there life has broken the law, though many minor, you still broke the law... You want Joe's name published because he drove impaired..well then everyone's names will need to be published. Let's get actual data/police stats on impaired driving. Look at what the root cause of their impairment -- was it being over served? No acess to other transportation? In order to fix a problem you must get at its root cause. And again I state: Deterance does not work!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    mej
    - February 1, 2013 at 07:49:54

    Why do we have so many different sentences for the same crime? Impaired behind the wheel = lifetime ban of driving. If you cant use your license responsibly, then you shouldn't have one! Can't provide for your family without a car, ...should have thought of that before getting behind the wheel, because the person you may end up killing won't be able to either!!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    John W.A.Curtis
    - February 1, 2013 at 07:33:34

    The province, City of Summerside, City of Charlottetown and tourism industry are part of the problem not part of the solution. Summerside and Charlottetown want adult entertainment and are increasing the sale of alcohol and increasing gambling. People have to take responsibility for their actions but the politicians aren't.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    teema
    - January 31, 2013 at 18:59:26

    When do we as a common society..say "enough is enough" when it comes to how our Federal government lets us decide in our own provinces how to deal with crimes such as drunk driving?...Each province has it's own way of dealing with this CRIME...Why is our(PEI) provincial government so damned afraid to finally put teeth in its laws...and penalties???

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    MontagueGuy
    - January 31, 2013 at 16:41:56

    As long as there is booze and cars we will have impaired drivers. I think pei is already a leader in this country when it comes to policing our roads and catching those who are driving drunk, spend some time and energy on something important like health care. I bet more people die every year due to improper care and lack of ER services then drunk driving. Just my two cents.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      SAP
      - January 31, 2013 at 20:43:56

      Well, I guess you are correct, so that's that, then. While I am at it, I will not worry about getting killed by a drunk driver, since I will probably die some other way. In fact, as long as we are mortal, we will die, so lets not worry about healthcare either.

    • Username
      To Montagueguy
      - January 31, 2013 at 21:09:28

      Ignorance is a huge factor in the rate of "stupidity" on PEI. Injuries caused by our impaired driverstie up our emergency rooms, hospital beds and funeral homes!! Keep your two cents.

  • Username
    Gerry
    - January 31, 2013 at 16:33:15

    The second, third, fourth, on and on, offenders were at one time "first" time offenders. Nip it in the bud right from the get go. As for the ignition interlock system, the habitual drunk driver can easily access a vehicle which is registered in someone else's name, yes? Rehab should be mandatory, first offence (no ifs, ands or buts). When one considers the amount of money involved in terms of repetitive fines, loss of license, loss of jobs, damage to families, ignition interlock, accidents, deaths, lawsuits; it is obvious that the justice system and society, in general, are just not getting the message across. Imagine what that same financial cost could accomplish with a successful and recognized rehabiliation program. PEI would be the envy of Canada. Time to travel in another direction.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    spud
    - January 31, 2013 at 16:12:12

    I think the PEI goverment is the bigest cause of dui on PEI by giving there friends the ok to sell there booze in certain stores. Cavendish food mart comes to mind for one just so they can cash in on the Cavendish music concert where 90% of the people are drunk or stoned.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Blondie
    - January 31, 2013 at 15:47:24

    I agree with ITS OBVIOUS WHAT TO DO . ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Lance Svenson
    - January 31, 2013 at 15:13:36

    How about this: First offense = 1 year in jail. Period. Second Offense = 5 years in jail. Third offense = Life in prison. Also, zero tolerance. Forget about this .08 nonsense. Zero tolerance. Ask Mitch Tweel what he thinks about this!

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Danielle
      - February 1, 2013 at 07:57:40

      So your answer is to lock them up and throw away the key? Really? Wow...

  • Username
    bob the builder
    - January 31, 2013 at 14:41:07

    I would love to see cars with the interlock system required to have special license plates that inform other drivers that this car has an interlock devices as a result of convicted imparied driving

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Two wrongs don't make a right
      - February 1, 2013 at 08:15:56

      So I have to suffer for my alcoholic husband? Thanks!

  • Username
    Rudolph
    - January 31, 2013 at 14:26:51

    You'll never, ever see something line "Operation Red Nose" here on PEI. The problem is no one wants to pay for it. It's an example of PEI's attitude, and that attitude is the main reason that drinking and driving will always continue to get worse here on PEI.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Agree with Obvious
    - January 31, 2013 at 14:02:59

    Absolutely agree with It's Obvious.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    OBVIOUS???
    - January 31, 2013 at 13:57:56

    Do you think that maybe our numbers are so high is because we are doing a better job at enforcing this crime, than other places? Do you not think that it would be a better idea to spend the money on addiction services rather than locking someone up for many years. Most first time offenders will never do it again, we really have to worry about the ones that are addicted to alcohol/drugs. Locking people up for longer will not deter people from doing something. People still murder. Do you think if the maximum senteance for murder was 3 years instead of life, there would be more murders? I don't think so. People know murdering someone is morally wrong, we have to make impaired driving morally/socially unacceptable and that is on everyone not just the government.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Danielle
      - February 1, 2013 at 08:04:38

      I love coming on this site and reading some of the over dramatic islanders. However obvious??? I adore u! An actual answer. Your right jail/punishment does not deter. If it did why would we need more prisons, why would we need prisons at all? Getting to the root of the problem thru programs will help, but more needs to be done. What, I'm not sure.. But I'm sure we should be listening to academics in criminology, psychology and sociology instead of our governments for the answers.

  • Username
    Bill
    - January 31, 2013 at 13:38:49

    Why not make these ignition interlocks mandatory on every vehicle that is registered in the province? I would never have a problem with putting one on all four of my vehicles, motorcycle included. The reason people are doing this is because it is very easy to hide from the law while doing so.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Typical
    - January 31, 2013 at 13:28:20

    What a typical over reaction. PEI is not the embarrassment of the country. Attitudes like yours are. We need to eliminate the problem but throwing people in jail for arbitrary times is not the answer. Its just a way for people to pretend they are addressing the core issues.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    common sense
    - January 31, 2013 at 13:24:53

    perhaps we should start treating it as it is. Attempted murder. You drink and get behind the wheel, you play russian roulette with your life, and the lives of every other person you meet on your highway to hell, and from the recent DUI accidents in the news anyone near the road you travel on is in very real danger. Time to stop treating these morons with kid gloves and start keeping them off the roads!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Mell
    - January 31, 2013 at 12:43:09

    Some of the responsibility has to lay with the bar staff that continue to serve drinks to people when they are starting to show signs of drunkenness. Everyone has to be responsible-the customer and the owners of establishments that serve alcohol. PEI has long had a bad reputation for allowing drinking and driving and not showing a harder line on these offenders- time for this all to change.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Its obvious what to do
    - January 31, 2013 at 12:21:04

    Firstly, all of you who think this sort of behavior is acceptable, clue in. What SHOULD happen, is: 1. First offense, lose license for a minimum of 1 year, vehicle impounded for no less than 1 month, at least 1 -3 months jail. 2. Second offense, lose license for 5 years, 1-3 years of jail time, and the vehicle is confiscated and auctioned. 3. Third offense, lose license for life, 10-20 years in prison, and all personal assets confiscated and auctioned. Enough is enough. We are the laughing stock of this country on SO many things. Lets lead the way on how to deal with this EXTREMELY serious problem.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Jesus C
      - January 31, 2013 at 13:23:50

      I think that we should be more worried about tougher sentences on sexual offenders. Much more serious crime and often times they escape with a slap on the wrist and no jail time. Who would you rather have roaming the streets of charlottetown: A person who drank and drove once or sexual offender that offended once?

    • Username
      Matt
      - January 31, 2013 at 13:40:55

      The only part that I wouldn't agree with is "all personal assets confiscated and auctioned". This would hurt the persons family. Other then that its all good.

    • Username
      Frankie
      - January 31, 2013 at 14:07:42

      I totally agree we need stiffer sentences for DUI but taking away their licenses is a joke to them. How many times do we hear about someone being arrested for DUI AND driving without a licenses. If they want to drive, they will drive, license or not. I say first offence ... plaster their faces all over the front page of the paper and all over the internet (on top of jail time). Take away the doing time on weekends too, if they commit a crime, make them pay! Sucks they are going to get in trouble at their job because they are in jail, should have thought of that before drinking and driving! Here's an idea... make them stand on the side of the road where they got caught for DUI with a big sign around their necks saying "I was charged with Drinking and Driving". Make them do it for a month, 8 hours a day...

    • Username
      Family Lost
      - January 31, 2013 at 15:09:01

      I agree that tough penalties with no exceptions, will be the only way to solve this problem. Losing a loved one because of the decision of someone to drive impaired is not acceptable. Nothing can fill the void of not having your loved one with you. The above poster "Its obvious what to do" is right and their idea may work.

    • Username
      Captain Canuck
      - January 31, 2013 at 16:20:52

      Yes it is a good progression of penalties. It is criminal negligence with a deadly "weapon" more dangerous than leaving an unlocked lodaded gun laying around. And of course the worse crimes would then have to follow. Thing is - we can't override the federal system. A pedophile and a drunk driver... which is worse? Is it worse to endanger the life of the public or is it worse to have molested one child? Maybe it can be argued that they both should have the same severity of punishment. I think ITS OBVIOUS was a little lenient for first time offenders. Let's say my very first crime was pre-meditated murder. Shouldn't I get the "max"? I don't believe in graduated punishment.

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Expert bloggers

Ride for Heart
Blogger
Heart and Stroke Foundation
Let's go ride a bike
[Sponsored]

More bloggers here

The Guardian Twitter

Advertising