• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (15)
  •  

Tobacco companies want case dismissed

Tobacco companies want the case brought forward by the P.E.I. government dismissed. THE CANADIAN PRESS/ AP,Michael Probst

Tobacco companies want the case brought forward by the P.E.I. government dismissed.

Published on January 23, 2013
Published on January 23, 2013
Ryan Ross  RSS Feed

In September, the P.E.I. government filed a statement of claim against tobacco companies

Topics :
British American Tobacco , Carreras Rothmans , Canadian Tobacco , P.E.I. , Ontario

Two of the tobacco companies the provincial government is suing are trying to get the case dismissed because they say P.E.I. courts don’t have jurisdiction to deal with it.

Earlier this month British American Tobacco and Carreras Rothmans Ltd. filed the motions in P.E.I. Supreme Court.

In September, the provincial government filed a statement of claim against tobacco companies it divided into four related groups, along with the Canadian Tobacco Manufacturers’ Council.

The claim alleged a conspiracy to keep knowledge about the harmful and addictive properties of cigarettes from the province and the public.

The government is looking to recover health-care costs from tobacco-related disease dating back to the 1950s, along with estimated costs for health-care benefits that could be expected to result in the future.

In the motions to dismiss, the tobacco companies argued they don’t reside in P.E.I. and they don’t carry on business in the province.

They also argue the alleged conduct in the statement of claim didn’t happen in P.E.I.

It’s not the first time a tobacco lawsuit has seen companies involved argue over who has jurisdiction.

Last year an Ontario court ruled that government had jurisdiction in its own lawsuit and the case was allowed to proceed.

 

Comments

  • Username
    JRSPLACE
    - January 24, 2013 at 10:48:08

    Let the tobacco companies off! Next thing you know we will have some fatty tell the government to sue McDonald's because it is bad for them!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    John W. A. Curtis
    - January 24, 2013 at 08:57:23

    Former Chief Justice Kenneth MacDonald should tesify at the lawsuit and explain which justices on the P.E.I. Supreme Court would allow a person to claim cigarettes as an expense and why. I support the smoking ban but not the lawsuit, The LegaL profession on P.E.I. hasn't shown all the facts.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Propaganda?
    - January 24, 2013 at 08:36:03

    An interesting case study would be to compare the propaganda of the tobacco companies against the propaganda this government created for their Plan B.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Yep
      - January 24, 2013 at 11:13:22

      I hope somebody at UPEI takes this up as a Master's Thesis!

    • Username
      who's on first?
      - January 24, 2013 at 16:06:18

      I wonder if litigation is possible for smoke and mirrors? You wouldn't have to wonder who Islanders could sue then . . .

  • Username
    Useless lawsuit
    - January 24, 2013 at 06:53:11

    This is ridiculous, the taxes go to gov't to offset the health costs. Gov't knows that it is bad,then ban them- or they are contributing and promoting harm to smokers. They would never ban them as PEI also has highest taxes on cigarrettes- making lots of money. And, how much is this frivolous lawsuit costing taxpayers? Enough with luking the systems, get descent jobs for Islanders.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Stewart McKelvey wanted PNP case dropped too
    - January 23, 2013 at 22:09:13

    The legal battle to expose the PNP list included similar efforts to have case thrown out, this is the legal wrangling game. Deny everything, even the other parties name but who is handling this case against big tobacco. It was not tendered. Alberta tendered the legal work when Premier Allison Redford became "embroiled" selecting her ex husband to carry case in Alberta. funny eh?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Druggist
    - January 23, 2013 at 20:59:06

    Druggies do not get free needles! they have to come into the pharmacy and pay for them just like any other customer...they buy a small bag of them to use and they reuse them causing disease to be spread throughout this island!

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      doesnt matter
      - January 24, 2013 at 00:04:18

      hate to burst your bubble "DRUGGIST" but you are incorrect. IV users can get free needles at the needle exchange, and not just the small bags they can get full boxes, 100s of bags for absolutely free.

  • Username
    vick
    - January 23, 2013 at 20:52:20

    wow if smokes are so bad then ban them........oh thats right half you decision makers smoke! I smoke occasionally and couldnt care less if they never existed , so if smokes are so bad for your health ban them and stop collecting 80% tax on them???????? Seems like a no brainer but then again the wine drinkers, beer drinkers etc..... would have to be banned as well!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    I think
    - January 23, 2013 at 19:21:51

    I think the govt is simply doing this to - oh - perhaps try to get more money to give out to their friends as loans. This govt cares ZIPPO about the people of this province.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    don
    - January 23, 2013 at 15:58:38

    they want and need money from the smoke companies but yet they give free needles to druggies that carries std's aids etc. but CAN NO & WILL NOT give free needles for diabetics.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Try again...
      - January 24, 2013 at 09:38:34

      "Druggies" that you are talking about, DO have to pay for needles. Maybe do your research before you start mouthing off...especially considering your comment had nothing to do with the story....

  • Username
    SAP
    - January 23, 2013 at 15:30:25

    Are they bringing cases against any ministers who used to peddle the stuff?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    John W.A.Curtis
    - January 23, 2013 at 15:22:42

    The lawsuit should be dismissed Ghiz government isn't willing to admit former Liberal government facilitated custody of children to parents who smoked cigarettes

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Expert bloggers

Ride for Heart
Blogger
Heart and Stroke Foundation
Putting those unused gears into action
[Sponsored]

More bloggers here

The Guardian Twitter

Advertising