• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (14)
  •  

RCMP's top cop dodges controversy on crime bill

RCMP Commissioner Bob Paulson was in Prince Edward Island on Wednesday to meet with federal, provincial and territorial justice ministers during their meetings in Charlottetown this week. Before those meetings, he took part in a check stop in Stratford. Guardian photo by Heather Taweel

RCMP Commissioner Bob Paulson was in Prince Edward Island on Wednesday to meet with federal, provincial and territorial justice ministers during their meetings in Charlottetown this week. Before those meetings, he took part in a check stop in Stratford.

Published on January 25, 2012
Published on January 25, 2012
Teresa Wright  RSS Feed
Topics :
RCMP , Conservatives , Prince Edward Island , Charlottetown

The federal government's omnibus crime bill has drawn criticism from legal experts and public officials across the country, but RCMP Commissioner Bob Paulson says he has no opinion on the bill.

Paulson was in Prince Edward Island Wednesday to meet with federal, provincial and territorial justice ministers during their meetings in Charlottetown this week. He presented his priorities for the force and congratulated the ministers on reaching contract agreements with the RCMP in all provinces.

But the key topic up for discussion during the justice ministers' meetings has been Bill C-10. It contains major changes to several laws, including adding mandatory sentences for a number of offenses and new measures to deal with young offenders. It also creates new offences in the Criminal Code.

These new, tougher measures will mean more jail time for many offenders.

A number of legal experts and public officials have slammed the bill, saying it focuses too heavily on penalizing offenders without proof these tougher measures will help eliminate crime.

But Paulson said he has no opinion on this controversial legislation.

"I don't have a view," he said in an interview with The Guardian.

He said he wishes to reserve comment in order to maintain his independence.

He pointed to recent accusations by Liberal Senator Colin Kenny that he is being muzzled by the federal Conservatives, citing his refusal to share an opinion on the crime bill as proof of his independence.

"Senator Kenny on the national stage right now is accusing me of not being independent. That's not true at all. I'm very independent. I'm so independent that I'm not going to sort of weigh in and discuss what laws are being considered and being passed," Paulson said.

Once this law or any other that pertains to law enforcement is passed, he will simply work to enforce them, he said.

"What I think is the most important thing for me as commissioner of this force is that we have to commit to Canadians and work with Canadians that we're going to lower the crime rate and we're going to increase our clearance rate. Those are the measures I'm interested in."

Kenny accused federal Public Safety Minister Vic Toews last week of trying to muzzle and control Paulson after Kenny was told a lunch meeting he was trying to arrange with the commissioner would have to be approved by the department.

 

Twitter.com/GuardianTeresa

 

 

 

Comments

  • Username
    Jeff Christian
    - January 27, 2012 at 13:04:00

    One hopes that Commissioner Paulson, having created this position, retains it when the government wants him to speak out publicly IN FAVOUR of some change they are making. Certainly, his predecessors had no such concerns. Worth watching for. Maybe we finally have a Commissioner who is NOT a tool of government, but instead really understands the role of the leader of the RCMP.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    kale
    - January 26, 2012 at 18:02:56

    every organization or person who does not question the policies or ideologies of the goverment should not have great responsibilities.how much trouble are we in when the man who leads are largest police force says" i was only doing what i am told"?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    frank white
    - January 26, 2012 at 13:20:04

    my mom taught me a valuable lesson when i was a child - "if you don't have anything nice to say, then don't say anything at all." ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- surely an educated, and well experienced, man such as Mr. Paulson would have his reservations on such a ridiculous piece of legistlature. everyone is for lowering crime in our communities, except we want to follow approaches that are scientifically proven to work - at a much lower cost... rather than spending far too much money creating a police state which will do little to deter actual crime rates.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Roger Dodger
    - January 26, 2012 at 12:28:57

    "Dodging a controversy" what do you mean dodging a controversy? He is not dodging anything, He told you straight up what his view was, "nothing", "independence", "no story". What you are doing is CREATING a controversy

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Bobby
    - January 26, 2012 at 12:11:41

    But he said the state also needs better options for non-violent offenders who are subject to mandatory minimum sentences, pointing to the rising spending on prisons. He said simply warehousing offenders is a costly policy failure. BOSTON (AP) - Gov. Deval Patrick used his annual state of the state address Monday to urge lawmakers to strengthen the state's community colleges, lower health care costs and revise the state's criminal sentencing laws to focus on the most violent offenders. "We must be smarter about how we protect public safety," he said. "That means targeting the most dangerous and damaging for the strictest sentences, and better preparing the non-dangerous for eventual release and reintegration."

    Submit a comment

  • bob ingerson
    mra
    - January 26, 2012 at 10:47:52

    i don't see him dodging the question.a smart move on his part. no matter how he answered the question the media would have used the answer against him.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    A Refreshing Change
    - January 26, 2012 at 10:27:48

    The new commissioner of the RCMP is a refreshing change (from Bill Elliott). It's a surprise that the public, media and (some) politicans aren't aware that the RCMP have to remain independant.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    angus
    - January 26, 2012 at 10:25:32

    'A number of legal experts and public officials have slammed the bill, saying it focuses too heavily on penalizing offenders without proof these tougher measures will help eliminate crime.' Let the bleeding hearts tell that to the victims, while younger criminal commit even more vicious crimes than ever before. Course under the current Liberal-appointed judges and Trudeau's justice system - it'll never be a problem of tougher sentencing on PEI where it's always slap on the wrist time. All the hug-a-thug crowd loves this babying of criminals until it happens to them.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Simon
    - January 26, 2012 at 10:18:48

    The last word on a potential RCMP investigation into PEI's PNP was many months ago. I do realize it takes time to make determinations on such things esp. when a government itself is involved so significantly. Further background on PNP is coming available today as CIC Minister releases his evaluation of the provincial nominee programs empowered under the federal Immigration act. Today's Globe and Mail carries the story- Ottawa moves to tighten provincial immigrant program. The article discusses that PNP has been a success for Prairie provinces but has been dogged by problems here in the Maritimes----But its record is far spottier out east: Incarnations of the program in Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick have been beset by allegations of corruption, scathing auditors-general reports and multimillion-dollar settlements paid to immigrants claiming they’d been bamboozled by misleading claims, the article states. Kenney further discusses that ---"We want to make sure the provinces are managing the program with proper due diligence and proper integrity. We need to continue working with the provinces in that respect,” he said, making special reference to immigration consultants in Maritime provinces’ investor streams as a cause for concern. Yes that sounds like good ole PEI. The Globe article and today's coming evaluation announcement may or may not be of use to the RCMP but it will be of definite interest to Islanders still wondering how the Ghiz government has managed to escape external scrutiny of about a half billion dollars in behind the scenes financial transactions in 2007-2009. World of wonders!!!!!

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      to SIMON
      - January 26, 2012 at 20:14:30

      somehow...you managed to avoid commenting on THE ARTICLE in question to publish a ridiculous rant about PNP. Just because the RCMP are conducting an ongoing (and I repeat...ongoing) investigation.... .....oh never mind....I don't think you could grasp the concept anyway!

    • Username
      Simon
      - January 29, 2012 at 10:54:11

      @ToSimon, but who is ranting here? I wish the content of your post were accurate but it is not. There has been no announcement of a RCMP investigation on PNP. There is no 'ongoing' investigation. I ask you to reconsider my post minus the flawed assumptions. You seem to be supporting the proper effort here but you are not informed on the issue.

  • Username
    Garth Staples
    - January 26, 2012 at 08:21:25

    Good on the Commissioner. Once Parliament passes a bill relative to policing then the RCMP must carry out their responsibilities and act. Personal opinions would bring chaos to our security system.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Aaron
    - January 26, 2012 at 07:42:12

    Im glad to hear that Mr. Paulson is doing his best to remain independent. The RCMP are not to have opinions about the law, but to apply the law as written. Creating laws is up to our elected representatives, and if the public is not satisfied, we can voice our displeasure at the next election.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    dm
    - January 26, 2012 at 05:34:19

    Why would Commissioner Bob Paulson be checking cars for stickers somewhere on PEI are they trying to show this guy as some big public figure head, and not really at the helm of the biggest police force in the country, that job is still some lawyers job with close ties to Harper, Bill Elliott i think his name was, its funny how the RCMP's becoming Harpers own little privet army and Canadians don't even know it, well i guess they do everyone heard of them throwing people out of public places and gatherings during the last election, even here on PEI we just never did anything about it like Harper was counting on. Anyway good luck to the new figure head commissioner maybe next time they will give the job to a better looking mountie perhaps Catherine Galliford.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Expert bloggers

Ride for Heart
Blogger
Heart and Stroke Foundation
Putting those unused gears into action
[Sponsored]

More bloggers here

The Guardian Twitter

Advertising