Greens get boost from federal leader



Federal Green party leader Elizabeth May talks about the importance of voting during a speech at St. Paul’s Anglican Church in Charlottetown Sunday. Guardian photo by Mitch MacDonald

Federal Green party leader Elizabeth May talks about the importance of voting during a speech at St. Paul’s Anglican Church in Charlottetown Sunday. Guardian photo by Mitch MacDonald

Published on September 25, 2011
Published on September 25, 2011
Ryan Ross  RSS Feed
Topics :
Green Party , Anglican Church , Charlottetown , Canada , St. Paul

Green Party supporters can make a difference during the provincial election, says federal Green Party Leader Elizabeth May.

May was at St. Paul's Anglican Church in Charlottetown Sunday where she told a crowd of about 150 people the Green Party is making a difference in Canada.

"I know you can make a big difference here on Prince Edward Island," she said.

May spent about an hour-and-a-half talking to the largely partisan crowd about different issues she has been dealing with since becoming the first Green Party candidate ever elected in Canada.

She won the Saanich-Gulf Islands riding in B.C. with almost 50 per cent of the vote in the last election.

May said she represents a riding where people were prepared to do something different and like P.E.I., her riding has a high voter turnout.

"I think there's some similarities," she said.

During her presentation, May talked about Canada's role as a peacekeeping nation, which she said has changed under the Stephen Harper government.

She also took aim at the government's bill that targets human trafficking, which she said is really an anti-refugee bill.

"There's nothing in here about human smuggling," she said.

May briefly touched on the Provincial Nominee Program and while she said she didn't want to get into too much detail about it, the program shows a contrast in the country's immigration system.

"It means we fast-track those people who have wealth," she said.

A lot of May's speech dealt with the importance of voting and at times sounded like a campaign rally as she talked about casting a ballot for a party that has honesty and integrity.

"Wonderful, dedicated people who are not really in politics," she said.

May said a lot of people who are disillusioned with politics think voting empowers politicians and they won't vote because they don't like how politicians behave.

Some politicians count on people not voting, she said.

"We've got to tell youth they're counting on you not to vote."

May said one of the problems is that young people think their lives won't be affected by politicians.

"If we could get the youth vote up in this country, well we'd have a very different political outcome every single election," she said.

The importance of voting came up again when May said young people need to vote to make a difference, especially in the climate movement.

"You can live off the grid, you can be a hundred per cent vegan and local organic, but if you don't vote you might as well be driving around in a hummer," she said.

When asked if she had any advice for P.E.I.'s Green Party Leader Sharon Labchuk, May said she didn't, but asks voters to think about what it would be like to elect a Green MLA.

It won't change the outcome of the election, but it will provide a voice of conscience in an election that has dealt with issues around ethics, she said.

"One green voice would be very effective."

For her part, Labchuk was glad to have May in Charlottetown and said she is well loved by everyone.

"It's been a good boost to the campaign," Labchuk said.

rross@theguardian.pe.ca

Comments

  • Username
    former islander
    - September 26, 2011 at 11:42:58

    I wonder how many of those "Green" signs have been laminated so they can be re-used over and over again. Also helps when you don't bother promoting your candidates by name on any of the signs.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    One Issue
    - September 26, 2011 at 11:32:33

    Great to see so much support for our environment. The greens are a good political advocacy group but we need to build a strong alternative political force in this province and on this front the Greens are not able to deliver the goods. If you listen to Lapchuck closely she would have us back in the stone age.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    John MacInnis
    - September 26, 2011 at 09:46:12

    What Elizabeth May said is not going to happen at all, because poll numbers clearly illustrate what the fate of the Green Party will be when the polls close. I'm voting "present" for this election, because none of the current political entities on the Island are worthy of governing, as far as I'm concerned. One "green voice" on the Island, which would be Sharon Labchuk winning a seat for the Greens in the election, would not be effective at all, except for being effective at giving Labchuk a temporary government job, unless she can win elections until she retires. A Green Party member in the legislature would have no significance whatsoever. Y'all have a great day now......

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      Elizabeth
      - September 26, 2011 at 11:42:45

      Fortunately, there are a lot of people who don't agree with you. One Green voice in the legislature would have a significant impact, because issues would not be owned by the status quo. Sharon has already helped to change a lot in this province, including legislation. Most people don't know that it's been her effecting those improvements. That was one of Elizabeth May's points: one person *can* make a difference. It all starts with one person - and I see it growing.

    • Username
      John MacInnis
      - September 26, 2011 at 12:04:49

      Well, Elizabeth, at the moment I see the deficit and debt on the Island growing, and that's about it. A provincial or federal majority government in Canada is a dictatorship, and the majority pretty much does as it pleases. A Green Party member would get to ask a few questions during Question Period, and then take part in media scrums when QP is over for the day.

  • Username
    Peter Johnston
    - September 26, 2011 at 09:27:48

    The Green party does use signs, but they are removed within a very few days of the end of the campaign and there is no trace left. The signs are then stored for reuse at the next election or if they are not reusable due to a change in candidate, they are recycled. To call these signs pollution is to misunderstand the meaning of the term.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Michael Nesbitt
    - September 26, 2011 at 09:26:54

    Nice try, Wiggins. Not hardly, and kudos to all the parties for updating their signage to be more easily removed, disposed of or reused (support structures, at least)

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Wiggins
    - September 25, 2011 at 22:50:58

    If the Greens are the party of the environment why do they have more signs polluting the landscapes than the other parties?

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      Sarah Jones
      - September 26, 2011 at 09:27:02

      The signs used for the Green Party are used over again. This means that many of the signs you see are the exact same ones you saw in the last election. They are not thrown out. The difference you will see is that many of these signs now have names that were not in the last election. You will however see those signs reused in the next election. :)

    • Username
      How many
      - September 26, 2011 at 09:22:26

      How many do other parties have, and how many do the greens have? You need to support a claim like that with some real numbers.

    • Username
      Darcie Lanthier
      - September 26, 2011 at 09:20:00

      Dear Wiggins, The Green Party has far fewer signs than the red or blue and our signs are much less wasteful. They are recycled and recyclable and printed on both sides to be twice as effective. Our Leader, Sharon Labchuk has three large signs and they are only 4'x4' which is the best possible use of materials and because they are undated, they will be reused in four years. We need only add RE before ELECT in 2015.

    • Username
      Donnie
      - September 26, 2011 at 09:19:36

      They can't afford the big signs Wiggins, so they put up alot of the small ones.

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Guardian is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Expert bloggers

Ride for Heart
Blogger
Heart and Stroke Foundation
Preparation is key
[Sponsored]

More bloggers here

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

The Guardian Twitter

Advertising