Broderick chides Canada on climate change efforts



Leo Broderick

Leo Broderick

Published on December 3rd, 2010
Published on December 3rd, 2010
Al MacLeod RSS Feed
Topics :
Community Centre , UN , UPEI , Canada , Charlottetown , Cancun

The Canadian government, as one of the most developed countries in the world, must be more willing to make changes to reduce climate change says the vice-chair of the Council of Canadians Thursday in Charlottetown.

Leo Broderick made the comment during a people’s assembly on climate justice at the Murphy’s Community Centre, which was one of many assemblies held across Canada while UN climate negotiations are ongoing in Cancun, Mexico.

The assemblies are intended to give people an opportunity to discuss the causes, effects and possible solutions for climate change and justice from a local to global scale.

With predictions the negotiations are unlikely to result in any real solution to the crisis and the recent rejection of the Climate Change Accountability Act by the Canadian senate, the council feels actions on a local scale, like the assemblies, have become increasingly important to finding a solution.

Broderick said he believes the message that emerges from these assemblies will be quite clear.

 “What will emerge is that the Canadian government, on behalf of Canadians, must address the issue of global warming and climate change,” Broderick said.

“(The government) has been ignoring the issue. They’re continuing to insist that we must have more fossil fuel development in the tar sands, they’re not prepared to deal with the developing countries who have not caused this problem and they’re not prepared to pay.”

As one of the more industrialized and wealthier countries in the world, Canada has an obligation to help the less developed countries, who have not caused the issue and are feeling the effects, find a solution, Broderick said.

“There is a debt owed to these people who have not caused it and we must work together with them to reduce the impact of global warming because clearly global warming is here and if we continue to live on fossil fuels and we continue with our addiction, this is not going to be resolved.

“There must be justice and it is a justice issue.”

Carolyn Brown, director of environmental studies at UPEI, made a presentation during the assembly aimed at educating people on what climate change is, its effects and causes and what can be done to combat the issue.

Part of the presentation looked at the effects on the Island and showed how rising water levels and subsequent erosion from the effects of climate change are likely to have a negative impact locally.

“On a global scale, the carbon footprint of P.E.I. is not that large but it will feel the effects,” Brown said.

“There’s going to be more just unpredictable weather and winds on P.E.I.”

Brown’s presentation also centred around the fact there must be a sense of urgency and society must act immediately to reduce the impacts of climate change and avoid those that have not happened yet.

“If we act now we will have more options open to us.”

Environmental activist Adam MacIsaac of St. Peter’s Bay also made a presentation and spoke about his understanding of the climate crisis and the need for climate justice.

Comments

  • Username
    country boy
    - December 5th, 2010 at 17:02:01

    Good grief...Climate change has been around since the beginning of time. Has anyone seen St Lawrence River valley where the mighty river once flowed? What has caused that change? If one wants to talk to me about pollution and the health impact on humans you have my ear. I have been around long enough to see very cold winters with copious amounts of snow and I have seen winters that were mild with very little snow. I really don't listen to people that drive around in big diesel powered buses to spread the word related to polluting the planet. Leo, I really don't know too many people that listen to you actually you have the opposite effect. When your name is mentioned people tune out. I have gone to some of your organizations meeting to get first hand information and quite bluntly your group scares me.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Head Shaker
    - December 5th, 2010 at 15:10:56

    Tony, if all this is a scam why would they have a plan to deal with it. If it isn't human-made why would you think it could be human stopped? IF you are too stupid to move inland, that's not the government's fault.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Tony
    - December 4th, 2010 at 17:06:50

    Rise and shine and wakey, wakey folks. I haven't seen any of the commenters say how much the Island will be affected by polar ice cap melting. I don't think low lying areas such as the Charlottetown waterfront stand much of a chance. But do we hear anything from our elected officials, much less an action plan, fat chance. If it's the usual political response -- it's do nothing, do nothing, do nothing. Then when the problem can no longer be ignored, of course, it's do everything. Too bad it's too late by then. As for the climate change deniers, don't waste our time, it's too valuable,

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Meme Mine
    - December 3rd, 2010 at 20:53:07

    The only effect we want to see is for the news editors, lab coat consultants foolishly called "scientists", PR firms, politicians and fear mongering environMENTALists, ARRESTED and charged with TREASON for leading us to neocon-like false war against a false enemy of climate change. ARREST THEM NOW!!!! A wave of DENIER rage has arrived. You faded Doomers have scared my kids for the last time. I say we start with arresting the news editors who knowingly pushed this needless fear of "unstoppable warming" and knowingly condemned billions of children to death by CO2. Arrest them all now.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    moe
    - December 3rd, 2010 at 20:52:41

    "God " LEO pick something .We (I THINK ) are tired of hearing from you on every thing on the planet ..I think it maybe takes away some of you're credibility to be spewing off about every thing that comes into you're head .

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Just saying
    - December 3rd, 2010 at 20:52:32

    Wheter we agree with everything, nothing, or some things, that Leo fights for we should acknowledge the fact that he stands up for what he believes in. I think that is admirable and takes guts.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Jill Macdonald
    - December 3rd, 2010 at 15:59:09

    The "Leo" effect. Whatever he is against, I am for. What he is for, I am against. Why does the Guardian continue to give this creature the attention he craves?

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      Dan A
      - December 3rd, 2010 at 20:51:27

      Agreed. Leo's so far to the left that even left-wingers cringe at the mention of his name. If Robert Ghiz wants to drum up support for his new maritime electric mortgage on young Islanders, he should send Leo out to protest it. Whatever position Leo takes automatically loses credibility. Also, this so-called Council of Canadians is neither a legitimate council nor is it virtuously Canadian.

  • Username
    intobed
    - December 3rd, 2010 at 14:41:03

    It is very unfortunate Leo and the Council of Canadians is leading this information campaign. It is an issue that concerns us all, but most people scoff at Leo and his methods. We need real leaders, people who the public will listen to, to head up these discussions.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Political Guy
    - December 3rd, 2010 at 14:40:50

    I guess these socialist professional complainers were too busy whining to take note of the "Climategate" scandal which showed "anthropological climate change" is a fraud, invented by socialists and propagated by Al Gore and Michael Moore. Anthropological climate change was the statement of theory that human activities caused climate change. This theory has been dis-proven over and over again. Recently, a whistleblower released emails from the scientists behind this theory, which showed that the scientists were manipulating data, hiding data, and flat out lying in order to trick the sheep out there into subscribing to global socialism. Al Gore popularized this fraud with his propaganda mockumentary, An Inconvenient *Truth*. (An ironic name). This lie has been exposed for anyone with a subscription to the Wall Street Journal, CNN, or access to Google to find out about. Just google "Climategate" or "East Anglia, hide the decline" or anything of the sort and you'll find all the media articles. What Leo Broderick and his socialist, anti-liberty pals are saying is that "People in the liberal, industrialized world created this problem, so they should pay for the efforts of non-developed countries to deal with it." That would be a reasonable statement if it weren't for two very inconvenient realities. The first: anthropologic climate change has been revealed as an outright fraud. NASA has released data showing that climate change is actually caused by solar activity and increased radioactivity in our solar system. The climate changes experienced on earth are commensurate with measurable changes on other planets in our solar system. The second inconvenient reality for Broderick's argument: the countries in the developed world are not liberal-democracies. Their governments are plagued with corruption, ineffective governance, and they have little if any respect for human rights, civil liberties, and the rule of law. If Canada gave large, or even small, amounts of money to these countries for so-called environmental reasons, we know from past experience that many corrupt officials will use that money for narcotics, drug trades, sex trades, and armed military conflicts, in some areas it could even result in genocide. The reality here is that mankind is not responsible for climate change, solar activity is responsible. While we can all agree that Canada and the western world have a far better standard of living with a far better democratic system than countries of the third world, it would be reckless and irresponsible to provide financing to undemocratic, violent, and oppressive regimes that would sooner develop weapons, buy guns, and murder innocent civilians, than build windmills. I note the hypocrisy of these socialist, holier-than-thou malcontents, in the case of Afghanistan they argue that Canada has done enough, that we have no business there, and that we should look at the corruption of the Karzai government as evidence that Canada should cease economic, social, and political assistance to the beleaguered nation. Consider that Afghanistan was the worlds second poorest country in 2001. It has taken hundreds of billions of dollars, thousands of lives, and 10 years of steadfast efforts to create a stable infrastructure in Afghanistan. Despite these enormous efforts by Canada, the United States, Germany, and some of the wealthiest, most developed nations in the world, Afghanistan today could not survive without our institutional, political, social, and economic assistance. Leo Broderick would have us abandon Afghanistan on the precipice of success. And he would have us believe that instead, we should divert the vast resources of the western world into an undemocratic internationalist socialist scheme to write blank cheques to despots and dictators in some of the worlds most troubled and unstable nations. Which is it, Leo? You and your anti-liberty crowd can't have it both ways. There is no greater example in the world of a nation that desperately needs Canada's commitments and assistance. We should finish the job and create a stable, free, and peaceful Afghanistan. What Leo Broderick suggests is that we abandon a new friend in the international community and fork over enormous amounts of taxpayer dollars to crooked regimes that do unspeakable things with that money. This council of canadians is an insult to all Canadians, to democratic values, to liberty, and to honest intellectual thought.

    Submit a Comment

    • Charles Foster
      Charles Foster
      - December 3rd, 2010 at 15:59:57

      Even if you believe climate change is "natural," which I do not believe it is, this does not change the fact that we need to take drastic measures to reduce CO2 emmissions. The amount of smog in large urban centers is becoming an increasingly serious problem and no one is going to convince me that living in a thick clould of CO2 is good for anyone's health. Rather than attacking each other we should be working together to solve this problem.

    • Username
      Political Guy
      - December 3rd, 2010 at 20:52:06

      Yes, I agree with you, Charles, that we need to take actual steps toward improving the environment. We need to reduce pesticide use, etc... etc... However, the reality of the situation is that Leo Broderick and his internationalist socialist brotherhood is trying to bring about a massive transfer of funds from Canada to nations that don't have the political or institutional capability to receive those funds without widespread corruption and wrongdoing. Leo's plan would do absolutely nothing for the environment because it doesn't include any strategic planning. It would only serve to cause further chaos in the under-developed world. Since you say that you don't believe climate change is beyond human control, I encourage you to research climategate, which clearly demonstrates that the anthropological climate change theory is an outright fraud that is patently false.

    • Username
      Do not Panic
      - December 7th, 2010 at 13:09:37

      Political Guy: leaving aside the rest of your lengthy commentary on all things Leo... the distressing thing about your "Climategate" and climate change assertions is that they make clear the fact that you have not studied the climate gate emails, nor have you studied the science. We all know you can find lots of links on Google to folks who will swear that climate change is a fraud... but what they and the rest of the climate change deniers fail to understand, is that the OVERWHELMING majority of the scientific community - who have been raising the alarm about climate change for years - represent the culmination of centuries of human kind's best and brightest efforts to understand the world around us. It's sort of like dismissing western medicine as a fraud because nobody on your block has the bird flu yet. Or not wearing your seat belt because you're just not gonna stand for some bleeding heart, government stooge telling you what do to. I know it feels clever to be part of an enlightened minority - we all want to be part of those kinds of communities - but this time, I'm afraid, the conspiracy theory is just a brief refuge from the scary truth of climate change.

  • Username
    William
    - December 3rd, 2010 at 14:40:24

    Is there a cause Leo DOESN'T support? Holy krap, Batman.

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Guardian is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Expert bloggers

Ride for Heart
Blogger
Heart and Stroke Foundation
Preparation is key
[Sponsored]

More bloggers here

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

The Guardian Twitter

Advertising