Customize your website

Green Party calls for investigation of shooting ranges as contamination sites



Published on July 14th, 2010
Published on July 14th, 2010
 

MILVALE - The Green Party of P.E.I. has requested that the provincial government test all former and existing outdoor shooting ranges for lead contamination and to add those contaminated properties to the Contaminated Sites Registry.

Topics :
Green Party , B.C. Ministry of Environment , Department of Environment , South Granville , US , Caledonia

The party also wants to make those responsible for any contamination issues to pay for damages and remediation.  

"The Big Boot shooting range in South Granville opened without a development permit and an environmental impact assessment which led us to examine provincial legislation and the impacts gun ranges have on the environment and human health," said Green party leader Sharon Labchuk.

"What we've found is alarming. Shooting ranges are essentially hazardous waste sites. Citizens oppose gun ranges everywhere and many have been shut down because of lead contamination, noise and stray bullets."

Labchuk says that the B.C. Ministry of Environment recently ordered a shooting range to conduct a contaminated-site investigation and deal with existing lead contamination because of groundwater pollution fears.  According to the US government, outdoor shooting ranges put more lead into the environment than any other major industrial sector.  

"Dr Corinne Rooney, author of Contamination at Shooting Ranges, says it is the norm that gun ranges world-wide are contaminated with soil lead levels exceeding 33 times the allowable limit," said Labchuk.

"Other toxic metals are present as well and when the shot or bullets degrade, the lead and other metals become mobile and can move through the soil into the groundwater. The only way to prevent lead and other heavy metal contamination is to keep bullets from contacting soil in the first place.  The Big Boot shooting range fires directly into soil berms."

"What we've found is alarming. Shooting ranges are essentially hazardous waste sites. Citizens oppose gun ranges everywhere and many have been shut down because of lead contamination, noise and stray bullets." - Sharon Labchuk

Labchuk said that lead is known as one of the most deadly toxins on the planet and is especially dangerous to unborn and young children causing permanent brain damage, among other things.  Countries have made progress to get lead out of the environment by banning it from products like gasoline and some paints.  No level of exposure is considered safe and it's listed as a toxic substance under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act.

"An outdoor shooting range closed down in Caledonia last year and I've heard there was one in Hartsville.  Government apparently has no registry of old shooting ranges," said Labchuk. "People have a right to know if their drinking water is threatened.  These sites should be fenced to keep people out and nearby residents alerted to test their drinking water. The threat to water, if the sites aren't cleaned up, can continue for hundreds of years. Any risk of lead-contaminated soil blowing around on the wind should be dealt with immediately."

Labchuk said shooting ranges are not even on the radar screen of the Department of Environment.  Her party will be pushing for legislation to restrict the ability of gun ranges to pollute the environment and threaten public health.  

Comments

  • Username
    Hannah
    - August 12th, 2010 at 16:30:41

    I think it is important to point out that the vast vast majority of those who are shooting guns are doing it for pleasure and not for the sake of a war. So why are many of you using your war past time as an excuse for gun firing? You should be happy you have no real reason to use one! War is traumatic enough.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Concerned Canadian
    - August 12th, 2010 at 09:50:54

    I just find it so ridiculous that many of you Islanders are nattering on about Ms. Labchuk's sincere desire to keep the public safe. At least spell her name correctly... Shooting guns should become a past time. If it really is necessary to propel pieces of metal through the air at a defined target then perhaps it should be done in the safety of a designated structure... All of the gun accidents that have occurred even within the last couple years is enough for me to consider never picking up a rifle. To err is to human after all. If you haven't looked at what kind of nasty illnesses that can be caused by lead poisoning; something that can occur with merely a few parts per million in your drinking water (which will happen if there is enough lead casings in and around the ground water) you probably should. It can mentally retard you. Which leads me to my next question: Did any of you eat any lead paint chips off the wall as a child? :)

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Douglas
    - July 15th, 2010 at 11:14:25

    If you plan on calling yourself a real shooter you have to be prepared to shoot your rifle in any conditions . I remember back in WW2 we had to crawl through the trenches a little soil contamination was the last of our worries . In my opinion i wouldn't mind giving Labchuk a swift kick in the but shes out of her mind . AND as for you JAMES you cant just google everything you have to get out in the world and experience it god dam i put in 13 years for this country and fools like you cant get off the computer for 5 minutes and take a walk outside.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    archie steelsburg
    - July 15th, 2010 at 09:49:38

    I don't shower, wear deodorant, shave, wash dishes or flush the toilet EVER because i believe in the green party! GO GREEN OR GO HOME!!! WOOO!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Archie steelsburg
    - July 15th, 2010 at 07:31:19

    This Labchuck one just keeps roarin about the most foolish things...it's a damn shame to see people open up a a place like this tryin to make something out of it and just cuz she doesn't believe in things like deodorant, she thinks she can just come in and shut it all down. This green party is nonsense and has nothing better to do than pick fights with people who aren't "green". Maybe actually gettin more than 6 votes in an election is something you should concentrate on

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    James
    - July 15th, 2010 at 07:28:24

    @ sniper Lead is very bad for human health. Have you ever heard of the Google search engine? It didn't take very long to find multiple examples of lead contamination from shooting ranges. I've copied out the first page of links from a search using the term "lead contamination shooting ranges" which returned 30,000 results. Read on for your enlightenment: ----------------------- http://www.lead.org.au/fs/shootingranges.pdf http://www.epa.gov/region2/waste/leadshot/ http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_8875.cfm http://www.p2pays.org/ref/07/06040.htm http://www.springerlink.com/content/t5g7744570770457/ http://www.cdphe.state.co.us/hm/shootingrange.pdf http://lqma.ifas.ufl.edu/Publication/Hardison-04.pdf http://www.webwire.com/ViewPressRel.asp?aId=117648 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V78-4K9CC8J-2&_user=10&_coverDate=10%2F01%2F2006&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_searchStrId=1400877894&_rerunOrigin=google&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=a3ece26b52398997968c94e0462512da

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      Island Sniper
      - July 15th, 2010 at 17:05:21

      JAMES: You mis-read my post and then went off the deep end with your leftist agenda. I did not say no one has ever contracted lead poisioning, I said I have yet to meet anyone that has been poisoned by range activity in their area. I've been to a lot of ranges in different province's in the last 30 years, I have met a few kids in the 70's that got poisoned from a lead pencil, I have never met a sole that got it from a shooting range. Your left wing american websites have no relevency here in Canada. That's why I had said in my post I would like to see a credible Canadain statistic showing how many people have been contaminated in Canada by lead because of ranges in the last 30 years. I have many friends in the TEA HILL area, some own property on the outskirts of the range and have so since the '50's and not one has ever had lead poisoning, not then and not now, nor have any of their neighbors. This new range won't see a millionith of the artillery that Alexandria point has over the years. Also there are certain types of ammunition that are lead free, not every trigger pull at a range is going put lead into the earth. A word of advice to you JAMES, not everything on google is the truth, and your left-wing scare tactics and Labchuk's whinning won't be effective here on PEI. Islander's have nothing to fear from this new range or any of the other ranges located on PEI, I am sure that a credible source will prove so, using solid science and not internet search engines.

  • Username
    Island Sniper
    - July 14th, 2010 at 23:20:03

    Labchuk hired a quack to give her something else to howl about. I would like to see a statistic from a credible source that shows how many people have become ill in Canada because of gun ranges. I have done a lot of shooting at many locations across the country in the last 30 years, I have yet to meet anyone that has been poisoned by lead because a shooting range was active in thier area. Labchuk obviously likes hearing herself complain and she will continue to use contamination fear to rile up the public. It would take a lot more than one small shooting range and a few stray shots to have the effect that is stated in the article. You would basically have to bury an aircraft carrier full of ammunition for 10 years or more before an unborn child would see harm.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Randy Campbell
    - July 14th, 2010 at 19:43:44

    The only "nuts" I see are the Islanders who think they can just contaminate our soils without consequence. Seriously. As for Labchuk - she took the time to do a little research, and educate us. I had no idea shooting ranges were generally considered hazardous waste sites. Seems like something we should consider, no? Lastly - Labchuk doesn't just speak up on issues that are in "her neighbourhood." Eastender... when was the last time you "made a fuss" about an issue effecting your neighbors. My hope is, recently. No disrespect... I'm just tired of people mouthing off about people who are passionate and trying to create positive change... and WORKING. People like Labchuk, Broderick, Hennesey etc, are WORKING... to try and do something positive. AND it's not they're getting paid for it either.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    True Green
    - July 14th, 2010 at 16:56:05

    Must be nice to head a political party when you want to complain. She's a real Islander now!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    James
    - July 14th, 2010 at 15:14:17

    I live in Alexandra, not far from the Department of National Defence's renamed "Alexandra Point Range" - it used to be called the somewhat offensively named "Squaw Point Range". This range has been assessed by Environment Canada as being a hazardous materials site due to the lead in the mounds. 50+ years of bullets will do that I guess.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    ace
    - July 14th, 2010 at 14:37:32

    What a nut.... Labchuk makes the "Green Party" seem like a farce.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Transplant
    - July 14th, 2010 at 14:37:29

    I think Sharon Labchuk is right this time. But lets not stop here. Let's get International laws in place, and fence off all of Europe. I mean, after all the bullets and shells that were fired during two world wars, everything MUST be contaminated by lead.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Transplant
    - July 14th, 2010 at 14:37:21

    "Dr Corinne Rooney, author of Contamination at Shooting Ranges, says it is the norm that gun ranges world-wide are contaminated with soil lead levels exceeding 33 times the allowable limit," said Labchuk. Also: No level of exposure is considered safe and it's listed as a toxic substance under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act. (quote from Sharon Labchuk). I guess this means Zero lead. If my math is correct (I don't have a calculator) 33 times 0 = 0.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Eastender
    - July 14th, 2010 at 14:35:37

    If Big Boot wasn't in Labchuk's neighbourhood, think she would have even noticed or made a fuss??

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Guardian is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

The Guardian Twitter

Advertising