Political interference allegations untrue: Spriet



Political interference allegations untrue: Spriet

Political interference allegations untrue: Spriet

Published on April 29, 2010
Published on June 14, 2010
Teresa Wright  RSS Feed

Hotel rooms werent released by agreed upon date, says Canada Games host society president

Topics :
P.E.I. Canada Games , Stanley Bridge Country Resort , PEI hotel , Stanley Bridge

The president of the 2009 Canada Games host society says a financial settlement with a P.E.I. hotel was not the result of political interference.

Joseph Spriet says a payment was made to the Stanley Bridge Country Resort for unused rooms during the Canada Games, but denies Health Minister Carolyn Bertram had any involvement in the deal.
Last summer, the P.E.I. Canada Games host society arranged agreements with various hotels across the province to block off rooms for visiting athletes, coaches and media. The Stanley Bridge Country Resort was one of those contracted to block off a number of rooms.
On Tuesday, Opposition MLA Mike Currie alleged Bertram stepped in and ordered the host society to pay for the blocked-off rooms even though no one stayed in them
Spriet says that was not the case.
The host society did pay for unused rooms at the Stanley Bridge resort, but Spriet said it was because the society didn't release them by the agreed upon date.
"We were late on that in this particular case, so they were exposed," Spriet told The Guardian on Wednesday. "We dropped the ball and we recognized it and dealt with it."
Spriet would not say how much was paid to the resort, except to say that the $30,000 figure Currie alleged in the legislature Tuesday was incorrect.
He also said that Currie was wrong about Bertram's involvement in the settlement.
On Tuesday, Currie accused Bertram of stepping in on behalf of her constituent to get this settlement paid.
The Stanley Bridge Country Resort is located within the Rustico-Emerald riding represented by Bertram.
Spriet says these allegations of political interference are just not true.
"I would not have accepted, nor would it have been welcome, to have political interference in the Canada Games host society," Spriet said.
"When I took on the position, one of my demands, and I didn't have very many, was that there would be no political interference and I told that to Premier Pat Binns when I was first appointed and to Premier (Robert) Ghiz when subsequently he asked me to stay on when his government came into power."
Spriet said he was personally involved in the negotiations with Stanley Bridge and would have known if Bertram or any of her staff were involved in the discussions.
The issue came up in question period again on Wednesday. Bertram denied any involvement in the financial arrangement reached between the host society and the Stanley Bridge Country Resort.
"I have nothing to hide," she said.
"There was no interference."
Spriet said there was one other P.E.I. hotel that received financial compensation for unused rooms, but would not give any details. In that case the fault was again with the host society, he said.
twright@theguardian.pe.ca

Comments

  • Username
    Dick
    - June 21, 2010 at 21:40:34

    They received a payment, but it wasn't Bertram that was involved?? Ok....well where did the money come from? Is it government money??? If it is, then who is responsible for it??? Whoever is responsible for it, is the person at blame. One way of another, the Resort had money handed to them....and if it was government money, it had to come from someone....so someone better stand up and accept the blame for it.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    David
    - June 21, 2010 at 21:37:25

    Once again, Mike Currie has an uninformed opinion that he tries to turn into a political scandal. Who holds his feet to the fire? Certainly not his riding, who was moronic enough to reelect him despite his COMPLETE failure as a cabinet minister and a liar.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Imcompetant
    - June 21, 2010 at 21:34:39

    First of all, no political interference, that must be a joke. Just look at where the events were to be held when the tories were in and where they were switched to when the Libs took over. Both were total political decisions and they made no sense.
    Also I think I would rather be telling people that the whole deal was a set up rather then the impression that 30k was wasted because we forgot to cancel the rooms, ooops. Talk about a waste of money!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    bill
    - June 21, 2010 at 21:33:09

    stupidity is costly for all but those who screwed up -----someone did not ****drop the ball**** someone didn't do his job properly but still got paid for it

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    OLd Tory
    - June 21, 2010 at 21:29:52

    Hilarious how all the big fat liberals are coming to Bertram's defence, Ryan Cochrane and now, Joe Spriet, give me a break.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    competence
    - June 21, 2010 at 21:27:24

    so, then the question becomes, why weren't the rooms released? Who was watching this store?

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    huh?
    - June 21, 2010 at 21:20:48

    someone better stand up and accept the blame?

    To quote the story:
    We were late on that in this particular case, so they were exposed, Spriet told The Guardian on Wednesday.We dropped the ball and we recognized it and dealt with it.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Trevor
    - June 21, 2010 at 21:16:15

    It was a blunder on the part of the hosts. Their contract had a cancellation policy that was in no way atypical. They failed to meet a contractual obligation of giving adequate notice so the Resort could not re-rent the rooms in They booked it - if they don't choose to sleep there they still have to pay for it.
    The fault here is entirely with the host society. There is no wrongdoing in living up to contractual obligations without trying to wriggle out of it (THAT would be unjust). Let's not waste outrage on imaginary political scandals when there are real ones aplenty to choose from. If something this trivial is to be called a scandal (instead of the consequences of a business blunder) then it makes the word 'scandal' meaningless when compared to PNP and patronage revelations.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    2 more cents
    - June 21, 2010 at 21:05:21

    So in this article Spriet said he was personally involved in the negotiations with Stanley Bridge and would have known if Bertram or any of her staff were involved in the discussions.
    But in the CBC The matter was discussed with Bertram's officials, but not with Bertram, said Spriet.
    Which version is true or are we going to get another story today?

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    vote island party
    - June 21, 2010 at 20:58:08

    its our only hope .this will go on for ever unless we put in a new party and do not come on here saying the ndp is the savior because they have stood by for years and said nothing until the island party was formed.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    His Position
    - June 21, 2010 at 20:50:47

    His position at Canada Games was also political.....Robbie Ghiz said Patronage would end with his gov't-its the worst we've ever seen!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Juke
    - June 21, 2010 at 20:50:43

    How does Joe Spriet know if there was political interference or not? He is a volunteer with seemingly no public administration experience. Is he expert on such questions? He is taking the hit but does he have the credentials to confidently make this blanket cover up apology for Carolyn Bertram and the Ghiz boys?

    Spriet seems to have allowed different wording on contracts amongst hoteliers for Canada Games or sombody in government did and now he is taking the hit for this overall administrative mess up. So where is his credibility on issues pertaining to public administration?

    Has Spriet consulted his own personal lawyer or has he just parroted the spin of the Ghiz lawyers?

    Lots of trouble coming on this one for sure. Legal troble. And financial trouble.

    Spriet is going to suffer. Bertram and the Ghizsters skate away again!

    Oh Joe!!!! Talk to your lawyer today. If you need one from out of province get to it! Protect yourself!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Alphonse (Red) McGurr)
    - June 21, 2010 at 20:48:47

    I believe Joe and it sounds like he did the right and honourable thing!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Rob McEachern
    - June 21, 2010 at 20:48:12

    No, no, of course there was never any political interference.
    Ms. Bertram was pathetic on CBC, struggling and squirming and denying. Wave the privacy flag and declare the non disclosure agreements because if she gave an answer it would affect national security.
    No interference, no conflicts, no spouses favoured, no Deputy Minister in Breach of Trust, no reason to not lend Kevin Murphy millions, no patronage, absolutely not asserted Mr. Ghiz.

    The speaker in Ottawa made an interesting ruling that no material can be withheld from elected officials.

    We have to wake up in PEI and get Democracy
    reinstated.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Wow
    - June 21, 2010 at 20:46:42

    This Liberal gov't wastes more money that could be used for good causes..its almost like its being run by a rich kid who never had to work for anything in his life. Next election can't come quick enough

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Tom
    - June 21, 2010 at 20:41:31

    Hilarious how all the big fat liberals are coming to Bertram's defence, Ryan Cochrane and now, Joe Spriet, give me a break.
    Do you even know who either of these guys are? Saying that is like me saying that you're a commie. I really have no idea, but since I don't like you that's what I'll call you.
    This commenting stuff sure does bring out the worst in people. It doesn't matter whether they are liberals, conservatives, new democrats, or the island hippy party, they are, and will always be, a bunch of crooks.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Gold Mentalist
    - June 21, 2010 at 20:41:10

    There may not have been political involvement with this situation but anyone on the ground had to wonder about a heck of a lot of other things.

    Some of the people in charge of this and that as well as some of the suppliers sure seemed to be well connected.

    It isn't PEI if someone isn't being rewarded for being a friend of government.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Dick
    - June 21, 2010 at 20:39:47

    So how much did Bertram pay Mr Spreit to say she wasn't involved so she wouldn't take anymore heat for another one of her spending mistakes. She should have got the boot when she spent hundreds of thousands of taxpayers dollars to decorate her office!!

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Guardian is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Expert bloggers

Ride for Heart
Blogger
Heart and Stroke Foundation
Preparation is key
[Sponsored]

More bloggers here

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

The Guardian Twitter

Advertising