Customize your website

Pesticide rules still to be determined

Published on December 24th, 2009
Published on June 19th, 2010
Staff ~ The Guardian

Editor:

Regarding the recent law passed on lawn-care pesticides: although this legislation is now final, it is mostly the regulations for it (still to come from the Environment minister) that will determine the strength of these 'rules'.

Islanders concerned about weaknesses should contact Minister Richard Brown right away (and keep objecting publicly) before those regulations are put into law.

Topics :
Sierra Club , Atlantic Canada

Letter to the editor - Editor:

Regarding the recent law passed on lawn-care pesticides: although this legislation is now final, it is mostly the regulations for it (still to come from the Environment minister) that will determine the strength of these 'rules'.

Islanders concerned about weaknesses should contact Minister Richard Brown right away (and keep objecting publicly) before those regulations are put into law.

For example, as the regulations are now formulated, all 'ready-to-use' products (except 'weed-and-feeds' and 2,4-D) would still be in retail stores for anyone to use, and lawn-care companies could use everything (except 'weed-and-feeds' and 2,4-D) including granular and concentrated preparations, as long as they notify government officials.

There is a list of 240 restricted pesticides, but those are only banned from retail sale, and many very toxic pesticides are not on that list. What would make more sense would be to ban all cosmetic pesticides except the established lists of less-toxic pesticides that are acceptable in organic agriculture (some of those might also be considered too toxic for cosmetic uses and also banned).

If a lawn-care company wants to use stronger pesticides, it should first try less toxic pest removal methods, then submit its case that this has failed and the pest is a serious problem, and wait for special permission from officials.

P.E.I. needs strong regulations to protect people and nature from unnecessary toxic cosmetic pesticides. Lawn-care companies and retailers will do better business with organic products, farming is not affected by these regulations, and government enforcement needs should be minimal.

Homeowners have plenty of safe alternatives for lawn care (see www.sierraclub.ca/atlantic/programs/healthycommunities/pesticides/factsheets.htm). The only losers are corporations who choose to keep selling toxic products. That should hardly be a concern for our P.E.I. government.

Islanders want health put ahead of corporate profits, and Minister Brown is expected to show leadership on this.

Tony Reddin,

Bonshaw,

P.E.I. for the executive committee of the Atlantic Canada chapter,

Sierra Club Canada

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Email to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Guardian is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Enter the following code

Please copy the text above in this box.