Customize your website

A conversation with Robert Ghiz

Premier Robert Ghiz and his wife Kate celebrated their first Christmas with their new daughter, Julia Elizabeth, at their Charlottetown home.

Premier Robert Ghiz and his wife Kate celebrated their first Christmas with their new daughter, Julia Elizabeth, at their Charlottetown home.

Published on December 26th, 2009
Published on June 19th, 2010
Wayne Thibodeau

Premier Robert Ghiz has spent much of 2009 defending his government's handling of the Provincial Nominee Program and it appears the Island premier is growing tired of the barrage of questions.

In his annual year-end interview with The Guardian, Ghiz criticized the Opposition Conservatives and the media for their persistent questioning on the immigrant investor program - particularly the involvement of MLAs.

Topics :
Opposition Conservatives , Progressive Conservatives , NB Power , Prince Edward Island , Quebec , Newfoundland

Premier Robert Ghiz has spent much of 2009 defending his government's handling of the Provincial Nominee Program and it appears the Island premier is growing tired of the barrage of questions.
In his annual year-end interview with The Guardian, Ghiz criticized the Opposition Conservatives and the media for their persistent questioning on the immigrant investor program - particularly the involvement of MLAs.
"It's unfortunate that you raise the issue of MLAs," Ghiz said.
"They have followed the conflict commissioner to a 'T'.
The conflict commissioner has come out with really a scathing report against the media and against the opposition for really attacking these people for following the proper channel. I think you're not really reporting what the facts are."
Everybody, said Ghiz, has accessed funds from the program, including Liberals, Progressive Conservatives and New Democrats.
"You like to focus on people that perhaps are connected to our political party," the Island premier said.
The Provincial Nominee Program or PNP is just one of the many questions Ghiz discussed with The Guardian during his hour-long interview, which will be broadcast on EastLink TV Dec. 29 and again Dec. 31 at 7 p.m.
Ghiz also discussed the proposed blockbuster deal to sell NB Power to Quebec and its implications in P.E.I., the overhaul in education, including the closure of eight small schools and the prospects of a cabinet shuffle in January.
Ghiz also defended Brooke MacMillan, the point man on the PNP file, a man he has refused to fire despite repeated calls to do just that from the Opposition Conservatives.
Ghiz said MacMillan was simply following the precedent set by the former administration, adding: "There was no conflict whatsoever" and he "…did nothing improper."
He said he ordered MacMillan to pay back some of the money to take away the perception of conflict.
"You indicated yourself that there was a perception there," said Ghiz. "We acted accordingly. It's unfortunate the leader of the Opposition can't get her own party to act accordingly as well."
Q&A ....
A LOOK BACK
Q: Taking a look back at 2009, what is the initiative you are most proud of?
A: It has to do with the global recession. As a government, we wanted to make sure we were going to be there to really combat or perhaps mitigate this global recession. We were able to introduce a five-year capital budget last year, $500-million over a five-year period.
If you look at the overall Canadian economy versus Prince Edward Island, Prince Edward Island has faired well compared to a lot of other jurisdictions in our country.
Q: I think at one point or another there is always a moment we would like to go back and change. Again looking back to 2009, if there was something you could change, what would it be?
A: We always wish the finances were in better shape and that we were able to put more into social programs but because of the economic downturn we weren't able to do that.
Q: Political pundits are usually asked this question every year. This year, I want to put the question to you. What do you believe was the best political play of 2009?
A: That would be the New Brunswick-Quebec deal that was announced with Hydro-Quebec buying up the assets of NB Power.
BLOCKBUSTER DEAL
In October, the New Brunswick and Quebec governments announced a blockbuster $4.7-Billion deal to sell NB Power to Quebec.
Q: What does this deal mean to Prince Edward Island?
A: Off the top, it really doesn't change anything. Coincidently, I had already started negotiations with Quebec to find ways for us to buy some of their cheap renewable energy. I view this as perhaps an opportunity for Prince Edward Island to purchase cheaper renewable energy from the province of Quebec.
Q: Will you commit to cheaper power rates?
A: No. I can't. Governments of the past have done that. But I can commit that I'm going to work on it. For too long here in the province we've had politicians that have said that our electricity rates are going to go down. We saw that with Meteor Creek. We saw that with Deep Panuke. We saw that when we got rid of New Brunswick-plus-10. They continuously went up.
Q: The deal came as a surprise to many, did you know about the negotiations to sell NB Power before the deal was announced?
A: I did not. That was a deal that they put together. I think it was a good deal for New Brunswickers, from everything I can see. They are out doing the same thing that we are out doing, trying to find ways to reduce down our carbon footprint and to be able to find more affordable electricity for our residents.
Q: I don't have to tell you there is strong opposition to this deal in New Brunswick. P.E.I.'s only federal cabinet minister, Gail Shea, also raised concerns about what impact it may have on a proposed 'Atlantic Energy Gateway.' What do Islanders have to fear about this deal?
A: In my opinion, absolutely nothing. In 1988, whoever owned the power corridors really controlled what the price was and who sent electricity through there. Today, it's totally different. There is a national regulatory body that controls open access to power lines.
Q: Much has been made about this proposed deal … that it has divided Atlantic premiers … with Newfoundland and Nova Scotia against the sale and New Brunswick and P.E.I. supporting it. Has this issue divided Atlantic premiers?
A: No. There is always going to be issues, regardless of what they are, that premiers are going to have differences of opinion on. I respect (Newfoundland Premier) Danny Williams and (Nova Scotia Premier) Darrell Dexter. I think part of the problem goes back to the Churchhill Falls deal that was done 30-40 years ago. There is a distrust there, so to speak, but today is different circumstances. I'm worried about the present and the future.
DEFICIT FINANCING
Q: This fiscal year, which comes to an end in March, the province is forecasting a deficit of $85.4 million. We've received warnings
from Ottawa that our transfer payments may not stay at the current level. Still, the province is committed to $500-million in capital spending over the next five years, including $155 million this year alone. Is this a prudent use of taxpayer's money?
A: Absolutely. These are infrastructure projects around the province that have really been neglected for a long period of time. A lot of these have to be done. Right now is a good time. Responsible governments are there to spend money and stimulate the economy during difficult economic times. For me, it's a very prudent move.
Q: There are some that would say we are leaving a heavy financial burden on our children, including your new daughter Julia Elizabeth. What do you say to people who are concerned about the long-term debt of the province?
A: It's very manageable. If you look at our interest bite today, compared to where it was five years ago, we're actually paying less on our debt today than we were five years ago in relation to our total budget. A lot of debt is being retired at higher interest rates.
Q: What is the plan to balance the province's books?
A: This year, I'm saying there are no new programs. Let's maintain what we have. From there, if our economy grows at 1.8 per cent that will help offset it. Also last year, we had to deal with a large pension liability that was there because of the crash of the stock markets. Today we have markets that are rebounding.
We were looking last year at a structural deficit of around $35 million, maybe $40 million. The rest had to do with the pension liability.
With a $1.55 billion budget, we should be able to grow out of (the deficit). We should. That's what are plan is going to be.
Q: This fall, you announced that you were freezing the salaries of MLAs and senior staff for two years. You said this would set an "…example of some of the contracts that are in place" for the Island's unions. Are you expecting the unions to also accept a wage freeze?
A: We're not going to force the unions to do anything. We'll go into negotiations the same as we do every other time. I totally understand that the unions are going to come out and are going to bash Robert Ghiz for this or that, and say that we're wasting money. That's their job. They should do that. Our job is to look at the big picture.
Q: Your party - the Liberal party - is remembered as the party of 7.5 per cent. I don't have to tell you that some public servants believe that decision … even though it was made by another leader … tarnished the Liberal brand with the public service. Does that mean you have to tread lightly as the leader of the Liberal party when it comes to negotiations with public sector unions?
A: We're not planning and we're definitely not going to do any legislation in this regard. There will be no rollbacks. This will all be through negotiations. We're in a new day and age.
Q: P.E.I. has been lucky to dodge the worst of the global recession. However, now we're seeing rolling shutdowns at Cavendish Farms, the Island's largest private sector employer. Those are expected to continue into 2010. Now McCain's is also talking about shutdowns. Are you bracing for another difficult financial year in 2010?
A: All the economic indicators that we have point that we're not going to be doing that. The Conference Board of Canada is predicting growth of 1.7-1.9 per cent. We're hoping for the best of possibilities. But at the end of the day, you can't predict the future.
EDUCATION
Q: Turning our attention to education. It's been a year of dramatic change in P.E.I.'s education system. In some parts of the province schools are being shut down. In other parts if the province, new schools are being built. Beginning with the school closures, why did you decide to close these rural schools?
A: At the end of the day, does anyone want to come in and close a school and have communities, or parents, or kids angry at you? No we don't. But we also have to look at the big picture. There are declining enrolments in this province. What our government did is we allowed the school districts to be able to go out and do their work. Sometimes as a government you have to make decision that not everyone is going to be happy with.
Q: The report called for 11 schools to close but only eight did close. None of the schools in the City of Charlottetown slated for closure actually closed. Why did that happen?
A: That's a question for the Eastern School District. I did not have any involvement in it whatsoever. We allowed the school districts to do their work. They voted in the way they did and as a government we respected their decisions.
Q: The province also announced that finally kindergarten would be brought into the school system. The last in Canada to make the move. What impact will this have on Island students?
A: It's about creating a level playing field for our students. Our early childhood educators have done a tremendous job but at the end of the day we want to be competitive in the world.
What we went to do here in Prince Edward Island is create the best possible education system, create the population that has all the tools necessary to compete in a global economy.
Q: What impact will this have on child-care centres, which say the move to bring kindergarten into the classroom may spell the end to some childcare centres?
A: Our early childhood educators play an extremely important role and we're going to be there as a province to help them out.
HEALTH
Q: This year, the province was faced with a daunting task… preparing for a global pandemic … H1N1. Over half of Islanders are now vaccinated. How would you describe the roll out of the H1N1 vaccine?
A: It's gone extremely well. There's going to be some areas where we're going to have trouble competing with Ontario or Quebec. But in others areas, having a small population is very beneficial. Are there bumps along the road? Absolutely. But this has been the largest vaccination program undertaken in a generation.
Q: P.E.I. remains the only province in Canada that has not reported a death from H1N1. Is this good luck or good planning?
A: Good luck. People are always going to get the flu. There are people in Canada who die every year from the regular flu.
Q: The people that manage the Island's health care system are changing again. Your government created Health P.E.I., an arm's length agency, to run the Island's health care system. But the province created just that, a health agency in 2003. It was scrapped two years later in 2005.
Four years later it's now back. How can Islanders trust that this time the government is going to get it right?
A: You have to have confidence in the decision-makers. There's no perfect system out there. The system that we had in place with the department itself running the health care system was not the best model. It's a made-in-P.E.I. solution. That's why this is going to work better. The recommendation has come from Islanders.
Q: The emergency rooms have now been closed in O'Leary, Tyne Valley and Souris. Montague's ER no longer operates at night. Meanwhile, Corpus Sanchez, a consultant hired to study the Island's health care system, recommended only two ERs in the province in Charlottetown and Summerside. The province says it will implement the recommendations in the report. But it also says it will not close the remaining two rural ERs in Alberton and Montague. Can you explain this apparent contradiction?
A: We're not going to do everything that Corpus Sanchez is recommending. Our healthcare budget is growing by nine per cent a year, which is unsustainable. There's new technologies coming out on a daily basis. There are new drugs becoming available on a daily basis. We need to be able to find a way within our system to be able to adapt to the changes that are taking place.
Where we see things going - as does Corpus Sanchez - has to do with preventative measures. Let's get people healthy. It's a fundamental shift.
PNP CONTROVERSARY
Q: This time last year, we spent a lot of time talking about the Provincial Nominee Program or PNP. A year later and we're still talking about it. As premier, what have you learned as a result of the developments regarding the PNP file?
A: Probably that it was a much better program than even I imagined. I personally believe that this has been a program that has been extremely beneficial to Islanders. It's allowed us to have access to capital. It's increased our population. It's added to our cultural diversity.
Q: It does appear that prominent Liberals - friends of the government, people like Brooke MacMillan - had access to this program that ordinary Islanders did not. In fact, the auditor general found MacMillan in a conflict of interest and you ordered him to pay back the money? Some would say this doesn't pass the smell test. Do you believe PNP has tarnished your government reputation?
A: What our government has done is followed the processes that are in place - the auditor general, the conflict of interest. And really, it's unfortunate that you raise the issue of MLAs. They have followed the conflict commissioner to a 'T'.
The conflict commissioner has come out with really a scathing report against the media and against the opposition for really attacking these people for following the proper channel. I think you're not really reporting what the facts are.
You like to focus on people that perhaps are connected to our political party. It's very important to point out here, you talked about a deputy employed who was employed by myself. That deputy followed the precedent that was set by the previous government. There was no conflict whatsoever, of an actual nature. They did nothing improper.
What the auditor found was that there could be a perceived conflict.
Q: Which the act says is one in the same, right? A perceived conflict of interest is a conflict of interest?
A: Yes, but he was very clear no actual conflict so he didn't do anything improper whatsoever.
Q: I don't want to belabour the point but you keep saying Brooke MacMillan didn't do anything wrong but you asked him to pay the money back. If he didn't do anything wrong, why did you ask him to pay the money back?
A: To take away the perception. You indicated yourself that there was a perception there. They indicated the same for Pat Dorsey, who you know quite well, who's the vice-president of ACOA now, and (Pat Binns' chief of staff) Peter McQuaid. We acted accordingly. It's unfortunate the leader of the Opposition can't get her own party to act accordingly as well.
FIRST CHRISTMAS WITH JULIA
Q: Turning our attention to the holiday season. This will be a special season for you and your wife, Kate, because it will be your first Christmas with your new daughter, Julia Elizabeth. Julia was born in July. How has becoming a father changed you as a person and as a politician?
A: It makes my day better. I get up in the morning, I read The Guardian and then I go see my daughter and I'm in a good mood. We're very fortunate, my wife and I, that we have a healthy baby girl. She is at the stage - 5 ½ months old - where she's changing on a daily basis. It's something absolutely wonderful.
Q: Being the premier that must put a lot of pressure on you to buy good gifts over the holidays. Who gives better gifts, you or Kate?
A: I guess we'll have to wait and see how Julia feels about it. This year, I'm sure she'll be more concerned with the tissue the gifts are wrapped in. We want to make sure we try not to spoil her too much. It's difficult to do that; right now she's our only child.
Q: Will Julia get a brother and sister at some point in time? How big will the Ghiz family get?
A: I guess you'll have to talk to Kate on that one.
LOOKING TO 2010
Q: Looking ahead to 2010, what is your wish for the people of Prince Edward Island?
A: You obviously want good health for Islanders. That's the most important thing in someone's life. I want to continue down the path of creating a province where every child in our society has the same opportunities in life.
Q: The capital budget contains $15 million in funding, which is the province's share of the Atlantic Gateway funding. Does that mean you're close to announcing a deal and could we see that in 2010?
A: We're really in a similar situation to a year ago, if you want to know the truth. We have the money set aside but it's up to the federal government to step up to the plate now and anything you can do to help us out there, we'd much appreciate it.
Q: What would the priority be if we get approval?
A: There are three or four different projects that are talked about. Obviously, the Cornwall bypass, there's upgrades to our highway system. Gateway is about getting your products to market.
FINAL THOUGHTS
Q: There was wide speculation of a cabinet shuffle last fall. It didn't happen. Pundits are now putting their money on a cabinet shuffle in early January. You're more than half way through your mandate. Is it not time to put a fresh face on your government?
A: I'm always evaluating things and looking for the right opportunity. I guess Wayne my answer will be the same as it always is - you'll have to wait and see.
Q: I was reading the June 12, 2007 Guardian earlier today. At that time you were getting set to reveal your first cabinet. At that time, you assured those in your backbench that if they were not selected for cabinet then they'd get a chance "in a year or two." It's now two-and-a-half years later. What do you tell your backbenchers now?
A: I say that they are doing a great job and that we're on the right track. At the end of the day, it's the premier's prerogative whether or not cabinets are shuffled. I'd tell them to keep doing a good job and we'll wait and see.

Comments

  • Username
    Steve
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:43:04

    How's about giving me the opportunity to shop in my own province on sunday!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Did I hear some???
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:42:28

    Did I read this right?
    He said he ordered MacMillan to pay back some of the money to take away the perception of conflict.
    I thought he was ordered to pay it all back, and if not how much was some??? How much would it take to change the perception of conflict? Tell us young Ghiz how many $$$$ did you decide it would take to change such perceptions?

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    bill
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:37:06

    crane is not acting in the best interests of all islanders-she is simply demanding the truth from one party while not offering the same truth about her own party
    ghiz, crane and other party leaders cannot act as an individual and are not necessarily saying what they personally think when they are on the political platform
    --they act under the name of their party,
    they are not in control
    --they are all the same on the issue of not voluntarily telling the truth about their party's involvement in the pnp
    --crane is paid to demand answers on liberal involvement in the pnp and that is what her party wants her to do. she will not demand the same thing of her own party.
    --crane , ghiz and all the others are looking ahead to some ?earned? position through political favoritism down the road and will do what is necessary to ensure their future income in the party or from the party
    it will take a statement from any one of them telling the truth of their party's role in the pnp to change my mind

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    we need a law
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:32:52

    Again,this needs to be said. When we elected ghiz,we elected him on his campaign promises to be an open government,to have transparency,to clean up corrupt politics,to fix our medicare system,and to end the practise of Irac changing prices mid-month,and to fight the rising cost of oil.And at the same time,he was going to make PEI a better place to live.Mr.Ghiz had PROMISED to do all these things.He GUARANTEED that if elected,he would tackle these issues.In todays world,who would not vote for these things?.So,the liberal party won by a landslide.Since then,what promises has he kept?Not any of the ones that are mentioned above,which were the strong selling points he promised[ i mean guaranteed]..Now what I'm getting at is this...If a indepent company were to hire a man who promised to turn their company into something better,and he failed,what would happen to him? NO company would let a man like that sink their business into the ground.He would be let go on the basis of he couldnt deliver what we wanted,and he was costing us to much money and risk..So why do we the people not have the same power?We hired the guy ,he lied to us about everything,why cant we fire him?We should NOT have to sit and wait years to an election just to get rid of him.We the people say put him in ,and they say o.k.,now we say 'get him out' and they say no way you have to wait years ,long enough for him to further deteriate life on our island[not his]. There should be a law that allows 'we the people' to remove elected officals sooner rather than later when its so obvious that he has lied to us.HE CANT DELIVER,hes costing us to much money and risk.I pay part of his salary and I am not happy about that.Heres something Ghiz should read and take heed,and I qoute TIME FOR CHANGE . If, by some remote cheat effect, the liberals win the next election,I am leaving pei so i can live better.That alone is a pretty bad statement isnt it.You would be shocked to hear how many people agree with that statement on this island.This is your legacy mr.Ghiz,not anybody else's.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Well
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:32:16

    It dosen't matter this guy and his useless
    crew are finished.
    People have lost all respect for any of them!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    rob
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:32:01

    So, does young Ghiz think the PNP is going away.

    Not until we are provided full disclosure. The feds have stopped the investor program because of the absolute sham Ghiz and his team made of this.

    PEI is the only province without the investor program and so far we have lost out on over 550 million of additional foreign capital.

    The young premier has allot to learn and he cannot protect all the lawyers and accountants any longer. Ghiz was a great flop himself and he shall be flipping pizza for a living real soon.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    TA
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:28:43

    To the Ghiz family..a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year..

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Martin
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:27:44

    This interview was Robert at his best. Denials, rationalize, minimize and avoid the complete truth. Hide behind one interpretation of the strict word of the 'law'. Until the Liberal Party is actually a political party of thinking active people, it will be this corrupt family compact, where big liberal families feel the massive entitlement to feed at the political trough, while ordinary islanders are held in contempt by Ghiz and his back room masters.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Good Interview
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:26:12

    I read most of the interview. Although long, I found the answers thoughtful and truthful. Good questions, Good answers.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Hillbilly
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:26:05

    This guy is a joke and needs to go. Less than two years now, thankfully. I have to laugh at people who label those that go after Ghizzy as 'Tory attack dogs.' No matter your political stripe, anyone that has lived on the Island since May 2007 has to know he was not/and will likely never be ready to be Premier.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Tony
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:25:44

    Braaack!
    Crybaby says he looks forward to debates, yet complains when the debate topic makes hin uncomfortable.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    OBSERVE THIS
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:23:21

    here's just an observation...this story has been on the guardian since friday night.This is monday.All weekend long there was a consistent {12} comments.Monday morning and BAM ,the comments take a spike.This tells me most people on here yapping away dont have a computer at home and you all are AT WORK,on your employers computer,wasting somebody else's time and money.And ,I would bet,you all are in a government office somwhere.GET BACK TO YOUR WORK.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Political observer
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:23:11

    I am hard pressed to find what all the fuss is!! Robert's record is one that shall be questioned for years because thats what oppostiion parties do...question a true leaders record. Did Robert desert rural PEI ...absolutely NOT. Kings co. now has a wonderful new wellness center, a hugh new high school, a fisheries department and the food bank is getting a much preferred better location. West Prince has a big new hospital, dept. of education and a sustainable beef plant. Did Robert let farmers and fishers down. NO. The Liberal Government decided not to sink TAXPAYERS money into an already money losing pork plant!!! The former tory government was more than willing to lose millions of TAXPAYERS money in the polar fiasco. and maybe the opposition parties can't read, but the auditor general has already cleared the MLA's of any wrongdoing but since we're on the topic...how quickly the opposition forget...what about Binn's own chief of staff? how many units did he get? and Im sure if you did check real close, you'd see many of the oppostion MLA's at the time...also got PNP money. Perhaps Olive and party should clean up their own doorstep before pointing fingers!!! I say JOB WELL DONE ROBERT!!!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Shelley .B
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:19:17

    Me thinks He!! will freeze over before you see another Ghiz elected to government.

    That is $550 MILLION DOLLARS Rob MacEachern is referring to that PEI has lost because of this sorry excuse for a man-Ghiz.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    FROM THE EAST
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:18:05

    Hey Mr.Ghiz you wanted to have more fireworks at the legislature and you got what you wanted-however it wasn't in your favour..Olive should keep dragging this issue out until its all public knowledge...bring in the RCMP or the Fifth Estate and lets get to the bottom of it! It's a shame that Julia will never get the change to remember her father as Premier-or is it?

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    TO OBSERVE
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:17:48

    Are you for real??? DID YOU FORGET IT IS THE CHRISTMAS WEEKEND??? Many people aren't home on the Island they are away with family!!! And some who are home are enjoying their FAMILY and the Christmas Season and I doubt they would allow the Guardian Blog Site to interfere with something that family oriented!!!

    IT's not because people are at work and using their work place computers!!! HELLO??? SANTA CAME TO TOWN THIS WEEK!!! A Once a Year Happening!!!!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Spoilsofwar
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:17:12

    George Campbell once again deflecting blame to sway favor and disillusion those with the ability to see scandal before it slaps us in the face. Where is our nominee program now George? Thousands of HONEST Islanders are without this opportunity only because the Ghiz government chose to alter the rules set up by the Feds to benefit themselves and those in their loop. If this is not true than explain why we have no PNP file today. You think Shae has no contact with Ghiz because she doesn't like him? Think again. Everyone with any integrity at all are quickly distancing themselves from this band of thieves.Look at the storm about to hammer Nova Scotia over their handling of the PNP. This will be a precursor to the flack that taxpayers on PEI are soon to catch. PNP isn't going away George. You may have lived your life voting along party lines George but there is still time for change,such as voting with your mind and not your wallet.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Garth
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:16:16

    Even though I was a longtime PC I worked hard to elect this Govt and this Premier.
    How disappointing.

    PNP MUST be investigated further.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Steve
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:10:04

    Stop whining Rob Machsookie from Devils Pond

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Milton
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:02:32

    Bill, I often note that your comments are critical and far reaching and I appreciate your way of doing things. Governments and all politicians need and deserve criticism.

    But your attack on Crane is not very fair. She has been put under a lot of pressure by leading Tory money men ( PNP cover up conspirators) and still continues to fight for the truth on PNP. Unlike the Liberals ( and some key Tory hacks) she sees both the injustice of the past PNP actions and the stupidity of not cleaning up for future programs, investments, immigrant and foreign relationships, etc.

    Why do you not give her credit? By opposing the will of the powerful hack Tories ( that Binns would not dare offend) she is standing on principle and making it frankly a challenge to win the PC Party leadership. Are you thinking of Dorsey and McQuiad, the top Binns boys who served themselves ill gotten PNP gains? Is that it? Bill, she can't deal with them as Ghiz could with MacMillan ( by firing him) becuase she has no jurisdiction over them. I have heard that she has told them both to steer clear of her and her strategies, campaigns, etc. These two relics from the old politcs
    ( still used By Ghiz) are not welcome in Crane's PC vision. She is trying to offer a clean break from our dirty and stupid past, which Ghiz still continues.

    Just some thoughts for you going into 2010, Bill. I am an old Liberal but I have been sick to my stomach with Robert Ghiz for over a year now. I hope to see the back of him in PEI politics. Crane is looking preety good to me right now and I have not voted PC since Angus MacLean thirty plus years ago. It's just time to close the book on the filth and corruption of the past.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    amazed
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:00:07

    I guess the old JESSE JAMES saying should be changed to include POLITICIANS & DEPUTY MINISTERS (all parties ) & ACCOUNTANTS.And I think it would still be easy to sort it out.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    bill
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:56:37

    the word is that all provincial poiticians will be handing out free Chinese fortune cookies on New Years Day at the levees.Simply sign the back of the slip inside and send it in, to be eligible to win one free pnp unit . Enter as many times as you like .
    Also,these chinese fortune cookies could be available at all restaurants all next year and draws will be held weekly
    check with your local politician, any party,for more details and hints on how to increase your chances of winning
    signed receipts for donations to political parties will also be accepted as entry to the draws and will be given special consideration just before each draw

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    bill
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:56:27

    he wants a province where every child has the same opportunities---GREAT!!!--
    PNPs for everyone at birth

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    voting decision
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:54:30

    Any perceived breach of ethics between the Cons and the PNP when they were in power will be considered long before we next go to the polls.The emphasis right now is on the party in power who could have cleaned this program up or went the other way and really messed it up. They chose the second route.That decision rests on their heads, not that of a party no longer in power.
    Ms. Crane can question but she is not in a position of power to make the changes that appear to be necessary. She is also not Pat Binns. His mistakes are not hers. Likewise, the 7.5 roll back was not Ghiz's decision. What could be perceived as mistakes by a previous party under a different leader will not play any part in my personal decision when it comes time to vote again. That decision will be based on my knowledge of the current party in power and how well they've done their job. If it was poorly done then i will consider someone new. Note, I say new , not recycled.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    run
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:53:05

    Well Robert there is something really and truly honest about this processes in place line, the newest remark in the PNP scandal cover up crusade.

    It is a straightforward admission of weak, opportunistic, and corrupt leadership, what we can get away with we will get away with.

    I have heard it said that Ghiz is as bad after 2 years as Binns was after 10 years. Using all of the old Binns tricks is just fine with Ghiz.

    Isn't that what he is saying?

    If the law is weak or even crooked then only leadership can protect us.

    Too bad, says Rob, the processes are in place . I am allowed to do this!!!

    WOW!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Quiet
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:52:03

    It will be great if Olive Crane get Tory leadership and then elected at the next election. It is the only way we will find out what really happened with the PNP program on both the Tory and Liberal sides. She will ask for an Inquiry into the WHOLE program.

    This is why so many Charlottetown big wig Tories are after Wade McLauchlan to run for the Tory leadership - to keep Olive out because they have something to hide too.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    To we need
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:51:08

    You make a good point!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    run
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:50:36

    Hey here is a good point mentioned to me today. If Ghiz is going to feature his wife and child in his political promotions then let's have the truth on the rest of the family story. What is Mr. Irwin Ellis' s role in PNP and how much does he, his daughter and the family have stashed way in their numbered companies? The basic info is on the Rukavinka site that the Ghiz government closed down.

    His firm is Arsenault Best Cameron and Ellis- PNPers and government consultant contractors par excellence.

    If we are going to see the baby then let's see the goods on grandpappy. No more bs without the truth please. It is not fair, Guardian, and it is not ethical.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    band aid
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:45:44

    The baby is cute. But i think it may take a lot more PR to soften the image of our premier. Wonder if its in his new yrs resolutions.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Caretaker
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:45:10

    To the George Campbells and political observers out there, please be assured this is not about partisian politics. If it was it would have died long ago. The people asking for full disclosure are from the 60% of the population with no political affiliation but an expectation of open ,responsible and accountable government. They haven't been seeing that from any of the three provincial parties and they are fed up with political corruption. The PNP issue , the Maritime Electric monoply and the Conflict of Interest guidelines of this government are an affront to any free thinking person. These issues will be in your face until Islanders get an open and honest government that puts Isalnders first, not corporate interests or the patronage system you seem to worship.
    Better dig in for the long haul!!!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    I agree with
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:42:02

    Milton Steed and Caretaker's comments. I too was disappointed in reading the Premier's Comments on the questions regarding the PNP !

    I don't believe the Conflict of Interest Report by the conflict commissioner bears as much weight as the Auditor General's Report. And I understood the Auditor General's Report as saying their was a Conflict of Interest even if there was a Perception of Conflict of Interest.

    Also the statement by Premier Ghiz that other Political Parties and their MLA's also received monies under the PNP doesn't concur that it was right to do so. I understood according to the Auditor General's statement it was not and they were also in a Conflict of Interest!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    From ottawa
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:41:39

    What was promised was openess and transparency,,,it hasn't happened..on anything..especially the important issues such as PNP, conflict of interest, Maritime electric and Quebec hydro. It is not an issue of party politics but an an issue of a future wheeein Islanders have some control over their destination. They do not want to be prisoners in thier own homes.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    bill
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:40:13

    ghiz and crane as well as the other political party leaders are all the same on this pnp issue--none have voluntarily told the truth about their parties involvement in the pnp-if one of them has spoken the truth , it was not very loudly!
    AS USUAL-- just blame the other parties--and keep checking for more fotune cookies for themselves

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    rob
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:39:25

    So, does young Ghiz think the PNP is going away.

    Not until we are provided full disclosure. The feds have stopped the investor program because of the absolute sham Ghiz and his team made of this.

    PEI is the only province without the investor program and so far we have lost out on over 550 million of additional foreign capital.

    The young premier has allot to learn and he cannot protect all the lawyers and accountants any longer. Ghiz was a great flop himself and he shall be flipping pizza for a living real soon.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Swing Voter
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:38:46

    Deflect delfect deflect.

    We had such high hipes for Ghiz.

    The in-experience is showing.

    Add that in with a weak supporting cast spells out trouble in the next election.

    Dear PC Party,

    Elect Olive Crane as leader, or someone of similar attributes.

    I see the CBC Political panel spoke highly of Crane in their year end discussions.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    pingu
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:36:25

    PNP is not just about the mlas on the take. It is about lawyers and accountants taking in millions of dollars of immigrant $ for little or no work. It is about ignoring federal warnings and recruiting thousands of immigrants despite the same. It is about this money finding its way back into Liberal party coffers. It is about a certain select few being chosen to receive these monies.

    If I were one of these immigrants I would be suing for the return of undeserved lawyers and accountant fees and the return of investment monies which the feds warned did not meet the standards required by the program.

    For the lawyer fees, they need only take the bills to be taxed at the prothonotory's office.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Milton
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:36:13

    I continue to be quite amazed by how Robert Ghiz verbally deals with the conflict of interest situation of Brooke MacMillan and famliy accessing PNP funds. No conflict whatsoever, says Ghiz. That is an astounding statement; it was so many months ago and it is even more bewildering these many many months since the Auditor General's report on PNP.

    When Ghiz first cleared MacMillan conflict of interest over a year ago it was the beginning of my serious suspicion of him as an honest leader. To read right now that he still believes this and rejects the AG report is really hard to take. He is the Premier and he is wrong about how the law works, for his own personal and political purposes he remains defiantly wrong.

    As Colin Younker stated, Brooke MacMillan was in conflict of interest because he failed to avoid the appearance of conflict of interest. That is the law not oh the law says appearance of conflict of interest. No No NO !!! By rejecting this part of the AG report Ghiz is showing his contempt for the whole report which only touched on a few of the thousands of PNP files but raised serious concerns. It infuriates me that Ghiz dismisses the laws of the Province, dismisses a key part of a report on the relevant law and then unbelievably says no laws were broken in the PNP scandal in the Legislature.

    That is a false statement by the Premier. Brooke MacMilan did violate a statute; he did break the law. The reason he is not being punished is because the Premier opposes this truth.

    The Premier's actions are shameful and not very wise for the PEI taxpayer. To protect Islanders he should have - one year ago or at least a few months ago- provided a new minister ( both Brown and then Campbell have been soiled by the cover up) with a mandate to negotiate a new PNP Partners program while firing MacMillan, Stewart and Dow. Brown and Campbell should be outside Cabinet until they are re-elected. They are not legitimate ministers at this time.

    The - my boys did nothing wrong with PNP - stance is obvioulsy false, baldly motivated by political cover up and not in the best interest of PEI taxpayers. We are all wide open on law suits and liability because Ghiz did not clean house when he had to. We are denied a new program that could be bringing millions legitimately into the PEI economy.

    Ghiz is taking us into 2010 with pretty well all the smarter options being wasted through delay and cowardice.

    The MacMillan conflict though troubling is a small fraction of the PNP problem. The real issue is the bad decision making of the Ghiz gang who did the jam thru and killed the old PNP program instead of negotiating with Ottawa for a new program.

    That is the real issue in all of this; The AG discussed this too but the media has not given it the attention it deserves, the Guardian though having done a decent job on this point in the Wright series. Hopefully we can hear more about the real issue in 2010.

    Ghiz failed to deal with the bad decisions by effectively endorsing these wrong decisions and those who implemented them. That is not the fault of Islanders. He did this to himself. The truth should not be suppressed because Ghiz is the Premier. It is all the more reason why the truth should prevail.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Milton
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:35:46

    Hmmm ... ok Bill I think I see where you are coming from. No Crane can't stand up and rhyme off all of the big Tories who took PNP cash in numbered companies nor can she say for sure all the PC hacks who are active with the Ghiz boys in the PNP cover up. Nor can she do a definitive swipe at all of the Liberals involved. On both counts she does not have all of the info. All we have heard about is the AG report which just touched a few of the thousands of PNP files. A full inquiry would get all of the info out there and Crane has been pushing for that. I think that this is the only real practical option for getting PNP info on the table. I appreciate you need to see kind of sign or signal but for me I have to go with the most practical solution to a serious problem in our government.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Cheryl
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:35:29

    To Observe this from PEI...FYI - all government and most other offices on PEI were closed on Moday.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    From Afar
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:35:27

    Re: PNP

    Q: If he didnt do anything wrong, why did you ask him to pay the money back?

    A: To take away the perception.

    (The next question should have been: 'Do you mean, to fool the people?

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    George
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:34:06

    well, well - the Tory culture of invective, attack, and if possible absence of actual thinking is alive and well on The Guardian blogs - so comforting to be buffered by the reality of nothing ever changing.

    cute the way the Tories foment about the PNP and the Liberals - but never seem to get around to disclosing how many of THEM were taking in PNP money - and as recently as last year! whoooo - hoooo - how about you Tories lead the way of disclosure - give us your complete list... it was after all YOUR program, duh

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Email to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Guardian is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Enter the following code

Please copy the text above in this box.