Customize your website

Kindergarten transition underway

Published on March 10th, 2010
Published on June 15th, 2010
Teresa Wright
Topics :
P.E.I. Teachers , Iceland , Canada

It's a major undertaking but the transition of kindergarten into the public school system on P.E.I. is well underway, says Education Minister Doug Currie.
Department staff has been busy over the past several months putting in place a number of key components to make Island classrooms and educators ready for kindergarten beginning in Island schools in September.
Many major tasks have already been completed, including the registration of students and the assignment of space for kindergarten in all schools.
More than 1,200 students have been registered at schools across the province for kindergarten this fall.
"I'm very pleased with the progress of the transition at this point," Currie said Tuesday.
"I've got to be honest, I'm very excited about the work that's going on. The thing that I'm most excited about is that we're going to have five-year-olds for the first time in the history of this province who are going to have the same opportunities of every other five-year-old in Canada."
To accommodate the over 1,200 new students, 50 new school buses have been ordered and bus routes are being developed. It is anticipated there will be an adequate number of child safety seats on school buses for children who weigh less than 40 pounds.
Classrooms are being prepared and formatted for play-based learning. Rather than rows of desks, there will be activity tables, computer centres, learning stations and soft floor space. Kindergarten furniture, equipment and supplies are being ordered now so that classrooms will be equipped by the fall.
Teachers already in the school system are also being prepared for the new, younger students entering their schools.
Sessions on play-based learning and the kindergarten curriculum have been held for over 300 department and board staff, school administrators and Grade 1, resource, music and phys ed teachers.
More sessions will soon be offered for school counsellors, teacher librarians, Grade 2 teachers, specialists and support staff.
But kindergarten instructors are still in limbo. Early childhood educators (ECEs) were given priority for the approximately 110 kindergarten teaching positions that are now available.
The department has interviewed and selected the necessary number of ECEs for the jobs, and they have all applied to UPEI for a special bachelor of education program developed to enable them to obtain their degree over a six-year period.
But school boards can't offer these ECEs positions until the P.E.I. Teachers' Federation changes its collective agreement with the province. The federation has a policy not to release details of its contract negotiations.
Teachers' Federation president Carrie St. Jean would only say they are ongoing.
"We're still in negotiations with government to get a settlement," St. Jean told The Guardian Tuesday.
"Until we have an agreement, they can't do anything. And right now that's where it stands. We're
very anxious for that to get settled but it isn't settled yet."
Once the federation has an agreement, all teachers in the province must vote on whether to accept it.
Currie said he is confident in the overall progress of the kindergarten transition but said the job is far from over.

Initiatives:

Here are some of the kindergarten transition initiatives that will soon be offered to parents and incoming students:
- All children registered for kindergarten this fall will take part in an assessment of their developmental skills. It will indicate how well children are developing in self-awareness, cognitive skills, language and communication, and gross and fine motor development. The half-hour assessment will be administered by teachers in local schools April 19-30.
- Parents of children registered for kindergarten will receive information on the assessment in the mail.
- Families will also be invited to take part in a Welcome to Kindergarten program at their child's school. This will give them an opportunity to meet their teacher and receive information on how they can prepare their child for kindergarten.
- For more information, visit the Kindergarten Transition website at www.edu.pe.ca.


Comments

  • Username
    Standards Rock!
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:38:48

    Qualified, Ofcourse the people who put the bridging program together will say its fine - they aren't going to admitt this program is no where near good enough to be viewed as the 4-year BEd it is trying to imitate. The Mella report told them to put together a 2 year bridging program and UPEI didn't even stop to consider whether they SHOULD be doing that, they just did it and it is a mess! How would I have done things different?WellI would have given ECE's time to get a real B Ed before moving kindergarten into the system and then during the move open applications up to all qualified BEds. Instead Mella has airlifted 110 ECE's into teaching jobs without ever considering the effect this would have on the teaching profession. No consideration has been given to substitute teachers trying to get into the system (this includes fixed-term teachers as well). ECE's are guaranteed 6 years of job security as well as a tailor made program to upgrade their qualifications - they will have a professional salary to pay for this, not work the min wage jobs you and I did to get our BA BEds. They are also being fast-tracked into teaching jobs at the 1-12 system by giving them a cert 4 - a cert level they dont deserve without doing the proper 4 year B Ed! So I think it is fair to say that ECE's are getting a cushy deal here. All substitute teachers get are a push backwards in the line for jobs as ECE's move into 1-12 as kindergarten enrolement declines! Full-time teachers are also facing uncertainty as the govt seems unwilling to negotiate more than 3 years of security for teachers while ECE's get 6 years. As far as your piece of paper example - are you aware that the graduating class of 2010 Holland College ECE's are qualified to get kindergarten jobs before qualified experienced teachers? Again the bias is for ECE's. This whole transition reflects a lack of respect towards teachers, their credentials and their standards. I hope the public wakes up and roars against this travesty.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Qualified ECE
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:33:37

    Standards: Perhaps you are right that I have quite a bit of faith in UPEI. However, to be fair I was very concerned about the bridging program. I did not want ECEs getting handed a B'Ed on a silver platter just for the sake of having it. However, I have talked with those involved in preparing the program and have been satisfied they will not be fluff courses. Is that becasue I have faith in these people, perhaps. I also have faith in the process. If the course is not approved then clearly something will need to be done to address these issues. I believe, as you clearly do, that professionalism is important.
    The introduction of kindergarten into the schools to fit in may not have been the best choice in the first place. However, the decision was made. Now you want the department to simply... what? Fire 110 people who they have acknowledged for 10 years are perfectly capable of teaching kindergarten? You aren't even willing to give them a chance to prove themselves? People who have been lead in a classroom for years you want to make EAs? Believe me, the government didn't make this decision based on what they thought best for ECEs! Perhaps the issue wasn't the benefits to the ECEs, but the benefits to the students.
    But going back to the original argument, the current ECEs teaching Kindergarten have the knowledge and skills to present the curriculum. Again, kindergarten has been feeding into the school system officially for 10 years. The knowledge they will gain from the B'Ed will compliment the knowledge they already have about teaching the core subjects at the kindergarten level. This program seems to be similiar to the concept of PLARing. It would not, nor shoud not, be an option for some joe walking in off the street. However, I simply cannot believe that the experience of these ECEs should be simply written off as irrelevent. Can you honestly say that a student fresh out of university with little experience in the classroom and with the kindergarten curriculum would be a better choice to educate our kindergarten children over someone who has been teaching and working with this age level for years and who is willing to go back and get the education to upgrade their certification? That is putting more emphasis on a piece of paper than on what is best for the students.
    Perhaps you are right; perhaps I trust too much. Certainly, I trust the school boards and principals to ensure that any ECE working in the schools maintains the standards put forth for educators. As I would expect they do with the B'Eds in the schools.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Qualified ECE
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:31:57

    Standards Rock: I am amused that you find me arrogant. I certainly am confident in my ability as an educator.
    Please recognize that although kindergarten has been to this point only funded for 2.5 hours a day that does not mean it was only taught 2.5 hours a day. Some centres provided full day kindergarten programs. In addition some programs had access to all of the facilities you are listing. Yes, I realize this is not all, just as I recognize and agree with the idea of universal quality education for all children. I think it would be wonderful if all children had access to the same quality of facilities and educators all across Canada. However, I don't think anyone would agree that every school is equally equipped any more than every early learning centre is equally equipped.
    In regards to my statement that kindergarten was the subject matter: I did clearly list the core subjects when discussing curriculum and classroom learning. What you read as an inference that kindergarten is subject matter was a clarification as to the level we are experts in. My apologies for not putting the word level.
    I would also once again clarify that kindergarten has been funded by the government since 2000 and as such has officially been part of the education system since then. However, you are correct most ECEs have not worked directly in schools. That does not negate the knowledge they possess of the curriculum or their ability to educate children.
    It seems we will argue semantics for a moment. It is true that those who obtain a B'Ed are called teachers. The who obtain an early childhood certification are called educators. I use the terms interchangeably as I believe that is what we are all trying to do, educate. We all continue to grow and learn as we educate, at least we should. If that is the case then clearly the knowledge we learn during our programs is not the final say in our abilities to educate children.
    Therefore, saying that because ECEs have taken a different route to obtaining this B'Ed they will not be teachers is elitist. These ECEs will be supervised by the principals in their schools who I am assuming are experienced teachers. They are already well versed in the core subjects for the kindergarten level as well as the integrated curriculum. By the way, we as ECEs call them that too.
    Having said that, I am obviously a bit elitist myself as I am perfectly comfortable in the knowledge that those who have not taken the required courses to complete a first degree will not obtain a certificate that is equal to mine. I am, however, realistic enough to recognize that there are ECEs who have far more experience teaching kindergarten than I have who have much to offer the children, parents and fellow educators in the schools. So while I may not be the majority, and while I believe in standards, I also believe that ECEs who have been teaching kindergarten for years with the funding and approval of the government should have the opportunity to prove themselves. If there are those who cannot walk the walk then by all means remove them. As we should do to teachers who can not walk the walk. In the end the school boards will decide which ECEs to place in which schools and hopefully a fair process will be in place to evaluate them.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Charlottetown
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:30:36

    If I had a kid, Im not sure Id want them in an elementry school before 6 years of age. That just seems to young to have 5 year olds in those huge buildings.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Standards Rock!
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:28:44

    Qualified ECE from PEI, your arrogance astounds me! Kindergarten is radically changing from a daycare environment to a school environment with many additional benefits and challenges. Kindergarten was taught for only 2.5 hours daily in daycares - it will now be taught for 6 hours a day in schools. Socially these kindergarten children will have to adjust from being the top dogs at daycare to the smallest puppies in schools. They will have access to fully equipped gyms, multipurpose rooms and music facilities. This is definately an upgrade physically and socially for these students.
    I am pleased to hear you have your BA BEd - you are one of only 6 ECE's who have university qualifications. You are not the majority - the overwhelming majority have 2 years of the ECE Holland College as their post-secondary education background. That diploma consists of 45% course work and 55% on-the-job training and of the 45% course work a significant portion of that deals with babies, toddlers and pre-K not kindergarten. ECE's are very qualified to work in the daycare settings they were trained for but the majority have no experience working in a school system. No one insinuates that ECE's are inferior to anyone - but they are not teachers. To become a teacher you need to possess a BEd - a degree can only be awarded if you take a minimum of 4 years university, complete at least 2 years of BA BSc course work and have practicums supervised by experienced teachers - none of this is part of the farce that is the PEI bridging program - which (all being fair) will not pass the MPHEC quality assurance criteria. Finally let me correct one other of your mis-statements,
    kindergarten is not the subject matter in kindergarten, the subject matter in kindergarten consists of: language arts, science, math, social studies, art, music and phys ed. We as teachers call these the core subjects and have taken BA's and BSc's to ensure we have the in-depth content knowledge of these core subjects to help us guide our students through them as they grow.
    Kindergarten is the grade you teach!

    Gerry - keep asking your fabulous questions - you have a clear understanding of the issues at hand!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    concerned
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:22:05

    I have a new child starting Westwood this year and she has to go on the High school bus and chance buses at the high school with out adult supervision is that right or will this be looked at as well?

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Sue
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:21:21

    Do not underestimate the capabilities of 5year olds.They can adapt and learn very easily.Both my children went to a K-5 school in NB and while at first it may seem too much(for us parents) children will surprise you.In todays world they need all that is available to them now!Full day kindergarten has been part of the regular system there for years and actually is more like grade one.Children love to learn and we as parents can help by encouraging that process

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Qualified ECE
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:14:14

    Amazed,
    I would be surprised if the Dean of Education said that he considered the program watered down since he is part of the committee creating it. However, those taking the course should be concerned about the transferability of their certification. The level of it will be different if they do not have the background of a first degree. Other provinces do have this type of certificate level for their teachers, however no one has tried to transfer it from one province to another yet.
    I also agree that the Holland College course is not geared to the school system. However, as already stated, kindergartens have been part of the system for 10 years now. We have been abiding by the government provided curriculum and regulations. Our report card is even provided by the department. We have already been using the play-based approach and integrated emergent curriculum to prepare children for grade one. The curriculum is not changing in September. The skill base that is currently in place for kindergarten children entering grade one will be the same as it has been.
    As for those entering now that don't know their alphabet, etc. many of those are coming straight from home not certified early childhood centres. Second, as with schools, not all programs are equal. You cannot possibly tell me that every child that leaves a grade level is at the exact same level as every other child and that every child knows every outcome. Obviously that should be the goal of every educator, to ensure that every student reaches the minimum skill set that government has set forth. Unfortunately this is simply not true and not all children will be at the same level when they enter the next grade. This is a combination of factors including the environment of the classroom, the focus of the educator, the interest of the student, the influence of the parents and peers, etc.
    Having said all that, I agree that educators should be trying to make sure all the outcomes are met and learned at all levels, if not exceeded! Do I believe that every ECE will accomplish this? No; not any more than I believe every B'Ed accomplishes this. We are all human and we do the best that we can. We work hard to provide our students with positive learning opportunities. Unfortunately there are exceptions in every profession. And as I already stated, those exceptions who are consistently not performing at an acceptable level should be let go from the classroom, whether they be ECEs or B'Eds.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Qualified ECE
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:13:07

    To Gerry,
    I agree there are bigger issues that will result from the moving of Kindergarten to the schools. This will make a huge financial impact on many Early Childhood Education and Care centres. It is estimated that in fact about 30% of centres will be forced to close in the first year if the government does not step in and provide a plan for a sustainable, accessible and afforable Early Learning system. Many ECEs, myself included, are working with parents to help them both understand the possible impacts and support them in making it known that the government needs to step forth and create this system. ECEs are working with the Early Childhood Development Association (ECDA) and owners and operators (ELOPEI) to bring the dire nature of these impacts to the light of the general public, parents and the government. So, thank you for certainly bringing this important issue to the front again.
    In relation to a permament position, it is true ECEs will need to complete their B'ED program before being offered a permanent position. This is similar to any position where there is a probationary period. If you cannot perform to the required level, then you should not be offered a permanent position. Teaching children at any age level is a job that has a lot of responsibility attached to it. We are helping to influence the minds of our future. parents are entrusting to us their most precious treasures. Any educator will tell you this is not just a job.
    While I certainly feel for the substitute teachers, this move should not affect their career in a negative way. In fact it would be a benefit to them as there will now be a whole new grade level that will need substitutes. What you need to realize is that the government is not creating new jobs. They are changing the location of current jobs. I can liken this to the movement of the Department of Education and Early Childhood Development offices from Charlottetown to Summerside. Does this move mean that those people currently working these jobs are no longer qualified for the jobs they have been doing for years? Certainly not. Nor should they be punished for the decision of the government to change locations. It is beyond their control. This is the situation of current kindergarten teachers. Now, because of the decision the government has made, we are in a place where we must decide what avenue to pursue. The truly unfortunate part of this is that the divide between teachers and daycare is becoming wider when, infact, we are all educators. I fear that ECEs who choose to move with kindergarten into schools will be met with resistance and hostility because we will be looked upon as being inferior, despite the expertise and experience we have to offer the system. The article notes that currently administrators and support staff are being trained in the kindergarten integrated curriculum. This indicates that the current curriculum for kindergarten is not only the accepted one, but that it does take training to impliment. ECEs have been working with this curriculum for years. We are the experts in this age level. It is essential that this be recognized and valued by the schools we will be entering. You will note that I say the schools and not the system since we have been part of the system for a very long time. It may have only been made official in 2000, but Early Childhood Education and Care has been the cornerstone of learning for over 40 years in PEI.
    Now we begin a new phase of our journey in quality education and care in the schools; and we WILL be entering the schools. We will be entering soon and enmasse. We will come with our manipulatives and our guided reading books and our songs and our games. We will come with our smiles and our hugs and we will spend our time teaching and learning with your children through play that engages them. We will work along-side our fellow educators as we have done for years. Not more, not less, but equal; essential to a strong education that includes the academic, the social and the emotional. We will work with the educators in our schools as we have done in the past with those in our centres. And each September we will thank the heavens for the strong ECEs still in the Early Childhood Education and Care field who work hard to prepare your children to transition into our classrooms.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Gerry
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:09:45

    The following excerpt is taken from the above mentioned webite (www.edu.pe.ca). This TEMPORARY program will accept two intakes of 75. During the first year, there will be 60 English seats and 15 French seats .

    Is there an intention to modify the requirements of the newly devised B.Ed. program once the two intakes of 75 (60 + 15) has been accomplished?

    Also, it states there will be an Exemption for certified educators at least 50 years of age whose years of experience teaching kindergarten add up to 60 or more with 5 years experience since 2000. At this rate, PEI's substitute teachers who are more than qualified (e.g. possess BA plus a B.Ed) won't have a snow ball's chance in hell of acquiring permanent employment status.

    Where is the Teacher's Federation in all of this? Don't they have an obligation toward the current subsitute teacher's? Shameful representation and definitely a serious lack of moral support.

    How can Mr. Currie state that Island children will have the same advantage as those in other provinces when the proposed kindergarten teachers will not possess the standard requirements of a B.Ed as recognized in other proviinces? Furthermore, will this new B.Ed program be marketable elsewhere in Canada?

    If the program has not been reviewed or approved by the Commission isn't Mr. Currie speaking prematurely?

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Amazed
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:09:31

    Qualified ECE, you make some valid points but the other posts are dead on....when Kindergarten moved into the school system in N. B. in 1996, the ECE had six years to get their BEd. It wasn't a MODIFIED BEd, it was the same BEd that everyone took. What is taking place in PEI is just wrong..to create a watered down version of a BEd degree is crazy..please don't correct me about this new degree because the dean of education at U.P.E.I. pretty much said so himself. He was creating something for PEI and that was as far as he was going...this watered down version of an education degree won't be worth the paper it is written on outside this province. Alot of people are VERY concerned about how this whole process was handled. The course at Holland College definitely is not geared for these educators to enter the public school system. These ECE educators will soon find out how different it is and the fact that the children MUST be ready for Grade One. There are alot of kids entering the school system that don't know their alphabet, numbers or how to properly hold a pencil. Now these kids will have to be at a certain reading level going into Grade One and in order for that to happen, the ECE educators will HAVE to make sure that the outcomes are met. It will be interesting to see how they will achieve this with their play based setting. I guess the teachers won't have to go far to find out why their students are not ready for Grade One....

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Qualified ECE
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:06:34

    As a certified Early Childhood Educator in Prince Edward Island I would like to make a few comments. First I am curious what opportunities Minister Currie is referring to when he says were going to have five-year-olds for the first time in the history of this province who are going to have the same opportunities of every other five-year-old in Canada . Kindergarten in PEI has been funded by the government since 2000. This, by the way made us part of the system . Does he then mean to say that government has failed to provide the system with the proper funding and materials to allow children to have these same opportunities ? Or is he insinuating that ECEs have failed to provide these opportunities? And is he including in that, the opportunity to be in a classroom with a 1-15 or 1-18 ratio? Because right now it is 1-12. What opportunities does Minister Currie feel our children are missing out on? As an ECE I ensure my children get a well rounded learning experience with literacy, mathematics, science, social studies, drama, music, physical education and social interaction. We ingrate learning based on the needs and interests of the children. We include parents and the community in our classroom experiences. We have fieldtrips, book buddies and guest speakers. I fail to see what opportunities our children are missing out on. Now, certainly I recognize that not all early learning centres are the same as mine, however, not all schools are equal either. The reality is kindergarten aged children are moving into the school buildings because every other province is doing it , despite the research that has proven that PEI's kindergarten children are more prepared for grade one than other provinces because of the system we have been working with for years. PEI is not always last to do things. In fact we have been first in many things, including making the decision to move the entry age to one that was proven by research to match developmental needs of children. Then we changed it again, throwing parents, children, schools and early learning centres into panic mode to adjust to other provinces. Interesting considering one of the lessons we try to teach children is that just because their friends are doing it doesn't make it right.
    To UPEI student, while I understand your frustration about not being able to walk out of school and get a job, please do not underestimate the qualifications of the ECEs who have been recommended for these jobs. I myself am currently certified to teach from infants to grade 12. I have a permanent PEI certificate 5 and took my B'Ed from UPEI. I have been teaching kindergarten for 7 years and work hard to keep my training and learning current. It is unfair to say that because many ECEs did not choose to take that route, they are not qualified for the job they have been doing for longer than you have been in school. Many chose the route they have because of a passion for the age level. It was the government's decision to move this into a system that many did not intend to go into. This decision in no way negates our training and experience. In addition, there are some ECEs who currently possess a first degree and so will be obtaining a certificate 5 after their studies. Those who will not, will be obtaining a certificate 4, which is recognized by other provinces.
    Also please recognize that this is not an issue of who deserves the jobs. The ECEs who have been given first priority have been teaching the next generations for years. We have a deep insight into the developmental needs of children in our classes built on our education, on-going training and experiences. The government recognizes that a change of building does not change this, so should you. Do not look down upon those you feel are less worthy because they chose to take a different path when in the end we are all looking to provide the best quality education for our Island's children.
    However, as Sue says, children are highly adaptable and will continue to be so, despite the changes of the system. Parents, too will adjust and life will continue on. In the meantime, arguments and comments such as those which insinuate that ECEs are inferior and unworthy of these positions merely heighten the tension among educators. We have been interviewed to determine our qualifications and now we will be given the chance to prove ourselves in our field of expertise. Those who cannot perform to the standards expected by the school boards will be let go after the agreed upon term is up. Isn't that what happens with teachers in the system now? That is the purpose of a probationary period.
    To Gerry, I too was concerned about the quality of the program being put into place for ECEs. As a B'Ed student myself, I did not want to see the quality of the program be inferior as that does not help us maintain quality in our field. Rest assured the program has gone through the stringent requirements of the review processes and the senate committee that are required before submitting it the the Commission. The students coming in already have the knowledge of their subject matter (kindergarten) and will be learning the methodology and philosophy of teaching just as any other student would do entering the B'Ed program. They will merely be doing the program part time. I would like to point out that having the proper education background is not the only thing that makes a great teacher. I believe strongly in high standards for our education system both the early and later years. Formal education is only one component. In the end, being a great teacher also takes courage, enthusiasm, flexibility and heart. These aren't determined by a piece of paper, but everyday actions. Kindergarten teachers have put their hearts and souls into their classrooms for a very long time, just because you moved the classrooms doesn't mean we won't continue to do so for the sake of our students.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Are You Kidding Me?
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:03:17

    Get with it from pe, just because everyone else is doing it, doesn't mean it's the right thing to do...

    UPEI Student from PEI, with your grammar and poor use of punctuation, I don't think you should be passing judgment on ECEs thank you very much.

    These so called QUALIFIED teachers are NOT *EDUCATED* in the Kindergarten curriculum, which is integrated and emergent. If Teachers wanted to teach Kindergarten, they should have taken Early Childhood Care and Education, to begin with.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Get with it
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:56:05

    Get with it Ch'town girl. Every other provinve is doing it, and it's about time we followed suit. We are always last to do everything. I think it's about time our govt caught up with the rest of the country.....

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    UPEI Student
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:52:42

    Its about time PEI joins the rest of canada in giving their 5 years olds the same opportunities that other provices have given their 5 year olds. However, If the governement allows underqualifed instructors into the school system they will be destroying the integrity of their own education program. Allow QUALIFIED teachers the opportunity to apply for these jobs. If ECE would have wanted to work in the school system then they should have gone to UPEI to begin with. They don't have to proper educational backing to be teaching the next generation. There will be 4 year olds that need ECE keep the school system for teachers.. with their 6 year education they deserve it.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Standards Rock!
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:46:54

    Qualified ECE you don't seem to realize that the bridging program is in grave jeopardy of not making it past the MPHEC. How as a BA BEd can you possible think that a program consisting of 2 years at univerisity with no BA or B Sc component and no impartial practicum will EVER pass the MPHEC standards? If it doesn't (and I feel confident it won't) then ECE's will not be granted a B Ed and they will not be certified to a level four - in fact they won't be considered teachers at all! They won't be a part of the PEITF and they will be breaking the School Act regulations if they teach in schools as well. An awful lot hinges on the MPHEC 's ruling and looking at the UPEI proposal won't make you feel too confident about ECE's becoming teachers with this deficient program. You sound fairly knowledgable but you faith in UPEI's competency to put together a viable B Ed as a 2 year bridging program is sadly misplaced. And just to re-state the obvious - no province in Canada will allow ECE's with 2 years HC and 2 years UPEI bridging program to teach in their classroom k-12! In Ontario last year ECE's were allowed to become EA's in kendergarten taught by qualified teachers when kindergarten became full-time there. That is what should be happening here and it's to the Island's loss that it isn't going this way. What is happening right now in the Dept of Education is nothing less than a deprofessionalisation of the teaching profession for the benefit of 110 ECE's. As a professional teacher I am outraged at this turn of events and you should be too!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Gerry
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:43:20

    To Qualified ECE...this goes well beyond JUST moving the classroom.

    Current ECEs' and substitute teachers' careers are in jeopardy. I'm sure they are very concerned regarding their status in terms of employment now and in the future. They have not been afforded what appears to be the luxury of a permanent position.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Are You Kidding Me?
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:34:27

    Qualified ECE from PEI, I think you should be writing to the Editor and giving that Judith Reeson the boot!

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Email to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Guardian is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Enter the following code

Please copy the text above in this box.