Customize your website

The future of rural P.E.I. at hand



Judge Ralph Thompson

Judge Ralph Thompson

Published on January 5th, 2010
Published on June 19th, 2010
Wayne Thibodeau RSS Feed

Report on Land and Local Governance to be presented to cabinet today, public Thursday

Topics :
Federation of Prince Edward Island Municipalities , Prince Edward Island , Montague , Charlottetown

A report that could dramatically change who is in charge of rural Prince Edward Island will be in the hands of the provincial cabinet today.
Premier Robert Ghiz received the Report on Land and Local Governance days before Christmas.
Cabinet is expected to decide which recommendations it will proceed with. The report will then be made public on Thursday.
The details of the report are being kept confidential but it is expected it will deal with the number of small rural municipalities across the Island.
There are currently 75 municipalities in P.E.I. The Island population is about 141,000. Nearby Nova Scotia, with a population of more than 940,000, only has 55 municipalities.
Despite the high number of Island municipalities, 70 per cent of the Island's land base is unincorporated.
Bruce MacDougall, president of the Federation of Prince Edward Island Municipalities, says Island municipalities have been waiting a long time for the report and they hope the report's recommendations are acted upon immediately.
MacDougall said some Island communities are too small to even take advantage of infrastructure programs. That, he said, has to change.
The federation also wants full incorporation of all Island municipalities.
The four largest municipalities also want the province to return to tax credits instead of grants for funding.
"It's way outdated," said MacDougall, speaking of the Island's municipal framework. "We're looking forward to the report and asking all parties to support the report."
This report is being seen as a major modernization of the Island's rural municipalities not unlike what faced the province's urban centres in 1994.
Sixteen years ago amalgamation was forced on the Island's four largest municipalities including Charlottetown, Summerside, Stratford and Cornwall.
The Island's smaller municipalities were not touched in that round of amalgamation.
Judge Ralph C. Thompson, a retired provincial court judge, headed the commission. He was appointed in November 2008.
It was asked to look at issues related to land use including planning, development and protection of land, water and other resources. The commission's mandate also included municipal issues like the impact of development just outside municipal borders, the future of unincorporated areas and revenue sharing with the province.
Communities Minister Carolyn Bertram declined to comment on the report Monday.
Montague Mayor Richard Collins said he hopes the report will finally see his community grow. He said it's ridiculous for the Town of Montague and the communities of Brudenell and Lower Montague to exist in a five-square-mile radius and be represented by more than 20 councillors.
"(The report) has to be implemented right away and the politics has to be taken out of it," Collins said.
In May, Thompson said planning what happens to the Island's land is like planting trees.
"The best time to do it was 20 years ago," he said. "The next best time to do it is now."
Ghiz announced the idea of a Commissioner of Land and Local Governance in his 2008 throne speech.
"Municipal and land use reform appears to follow cycles, with greater or lesser degrees of change at any given point," the province said in a statement before Christmas.
"It is time once again to take a comprehensive look at the structures that govern the day-to-day life of Island residents, guide our local municipal officials, and direct our use of the land."

Objectives:

- The commissioner shall identify concerns and recommend changes in the areas of the provincial approach to land use planning, municipal structures and municipal governance, in order to better protect our land and water resources, promote strong and vibrant local governments, and enable the province to respond to issues such as climate change, viewscape protection, and urban-rural conflicts.
- The commissioner shall develop potential action plans and options, which would lead, if adopted by government, to a new model of land use planning for the province within the next five to seven years and recommendations on possible future municipal structures and governance, with emphasis on public information dissemination and public engagement.

Comments

  • Username
    Democrat
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:34:47

    Undioubtedly whatever Judge Thompson recommends will have to more democratic and economically feasible than what we are now enduring. The incorporated community in which I live has approximately 70 residents. We have an Official Plan, five Councillors and as of Monday night five committees. One family has 2 members serving on Council,two members serving on two of the committees and one member serving on the other 3 committees appointed by Council. Although the community's two primary industries are farming and fishing, not one farmer or fisher serve on council or on a committee although an American citizen serves on the Planning Board . These are the people who administer and implement land use policies for this community. A family compact it may be, but a democracy it isn't!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Country
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:34:17

    Aww..not again Bertram....yes again. No comment this time, well that's consistent, no movement on that file yet, have not received any information on that, had no comment. How many times and different expressions from this one do we need to understand, she knows not what she does.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Charley
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:32:09

    There can't be any question about the # of Municipalities. My suggestion is EACH of the Regional High School area become a Municipality. What we have is NOT working as we have too much duplication going on.

    There is one area on the Island with 4, yes 4, Fire Departments with 7 miles. Yes, we need Fire protection but the horses have been replaced by trucks with wheels. imagine !!!

    Its' 2010 lets' get at it !!!!!!!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    wondering about it
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:24:29

    All that will happen is that the townies and do gooders will carry the day and rural residents will soon not be able to cut our lawns without a permit. We are all forced into town now as regulations make it so you can't even buy gas in most rural communities. We have to go to town to spend our money, rural stores and post offices are gone, schools are closing, you can't subdivide land or build where you want. Farmers are restriced in their practices you can't even drive your ATV on a beach to get a few clams anymore.

    The land belongs to whoever has the title. Any changes in land use in the rural areas should be put to a plebiscite and each item voted on by RURAL RESIDENTS ONLY. Send the so called planners back to Ontario or where ever they got their degrees from and let them practice their poison back there.

    There are reasons why people choose to live away from cities, towns and incorporated municipalities. Tell Mayor Collins to forget about the nonsense of putting everyone in one big pot of stew.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    everyman
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:22:01

    How can anyone be so eager to implement the plan when IT HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED YET??

    Can you smell a rat????

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Charlottetownian
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:21:27

    Rural living is a lifestyle choice, and shouldnt be subsiized by more productive people.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Hillbilly
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:19:11

    I'm guessing 'Democrat' lives in Victoria. That place is a real joke. Charlottetownian is quite the character...rural P.E.I. is the only real P.E.I.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Confused on Priorities
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:13:53

    I would love to see one level of government as mentioned above...however the early news I had read last year about this stank of a tax-grab on areas that are not incorporated. Tax rates around 1% for rural areas could increase to Stratford/Charlottetown levels...without any of the services to go with the costs. We live in a rural area by choice and enjoy not paying exorbitant taxes...we have to drive a little ways to get to town but that is the compromise...if we have to pay higher taxes for no good reason what is the incentive to inhabit the rural areas of the island if you are not a farmer? (privacy etc...I know)...but who wants to pay for Ch'tn or Stratford sewer problems when we have septic and wells that we have already paid for.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    ben
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:10:42

    change is always hard, some winners and some losers

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Quiet
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:48:06

    Fewer municipalities is not automatically a good thing.

    Just ask the residents of Winsloe, East and West Royalty. They were forced into amalgamating with Charlottetown and all they got was skyrocketing taxes and very little increased services.

    Another example from Charlottetown is how everything is done for and focused on the dieing downtown core at the expense of the rural (Winsloe, West and East Royalty) parts of the city.

    The same happened when Stratford was amalgamated. Keppoch, Kinlock and Battery Point saw huge tax jumps and got basically nothing for it.

    It is interesting that we don't see the small municipalties doing the whining and crying and begging for amalgamation - it is the big cities who have mismanaged their finances to where they need someone else's money to bail them out.

    And by the way, this is what has also happened in NS where some municipaltities contain a whole county. It has lead to more centralization of services and residential areas and the dieing of the outlying areas.

    Forced amalgamation is not always the answer. Common sense is.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    JL
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:47:29

    ''There are currently 75 municipalities in P.E.I. The Island population is about 141,000.''

    And that's why we need only ONE government for this entire Island - the way it used to be before city and town and community councils were created and the perplexing mishmash of over-regulation and taxation.

    Time to simplify EVERYTHING - one level of government for this entire Island. Tax property owners based on their proximity to public services. One single Island fire service. One single Island police service. Etc. etc. etc.

    Get rid of the municipal level of government and all the artificial boundary lines of political geography that unnecessarily divide us.

    Come on CABINET ! You know that this is the right way to go. We have the same landmass as Halifax County and one third the population - they have a single municipality. Why shouldn't we?

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    JL
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:46:05

    We can't afford to pay for municipal governments and all the politicians they require.

    I don't live in a municipally incorporated area but I do use services paid for by municipal taxpayers (recreation, etc.).

    This island is too tiny in size and population to have this extra layer of government. If we have a single government, I don't mind paying a bit more in tax for public services based on my proximity to them.

    What's unfair is putting my area under a municipality - then I have to pay for all that administrative overhead that isn't even needed.

    The provincial government the local government concerns in my area - why can't this be the case for the entire island?

    Get rid of municipalities like Charlottetown, Montague, Alberton, Kensington, etc.

    One single integrated government for this entire island. That's what's needed.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    jl give a break
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:45:48

    ghiz and his sleazy hacks ie const cceo and builders realize if the are to continue on this unstainable pace of infuracture/ building boom the have to have someone pay.jim maccauly introduced this concept in feb 2006 when in the tri region around morell voted no to the wellness ctr tax.he moved the traveling circus to montague and the good people in the area voted no.we are read to fight jim and his brothers on this one to their final defeat .the fun is just begiinning.Can't wait to critique you report Jim

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    pissed off
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:43:23

    This can't happen!My folks live in st.eleanors and they had no say in becoming part of Summerside.There taxs doubled the next year.We all know that Summerside wants to take over Selmon park for the tax income and the airport there.This is more tax money to pay off that new arena that only Summerside people go to.I move out to the country so I did'nt have to pay $3000.00 a year in taxs.So,Summerside you are quite fine where you are!!! Stay out of the country.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    who's in charge
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:41:24

    Gee, in a democracy I thought THE PEOPLE were in charge.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    To Charlottetownian
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:38:46

    Do you really believe what you are saying, Charlottetownian, or are you just trying to inflame the situation?

    I agree, rural living is a lifestyle choice, and it comes with lots of deliberate sacrifices. No side walks, reduced lighting, no public transit, no public water / sewer systems. People who choose to live in rural areas are content with these choices, and do not demand the level of services that city / suburban areas do.

    This choice has NOTHING to do with their level of productivity. Your comment is insulting and arrogant. I expect both city and rural dwellers will disassociate with you and your narrow- minded views.

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Guardian is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

The Guardian Twitter

Advertising