Brown not apologizing for slow approach to lawn pesticides



Brown not apologizing for slow approach to lawn pesticides

Brown not apologizing for slow approach to lawn pesticides

Published on March 10th, 2010
Published on June 14th, 2010
Nigel Armstrong RSS Feed
Topics :
Green Party , P.E.I. Environmental Health Co , Prince Edward Island , New Brunswick , Ontario

Environment Minister Richard Brown is not apologizing for taking a slow approach to banning lawn pesticides as he gingerly stepped around a meeting with environmentalists Tuesday.
On April 1 this year, a ban on lawn products containing 2,4-D will come into effect on P.E.I. Brown says that will mean 97.1 per cent of herbicides for lawns that had been on store shelves last year won't be there this year. It includes combination products known as weed and feed.
Green Party Leader Sharon Labchuk was also at the meeting, warning that retailers will simply replace past products with new ones containing equally dangerous chemicals that are not banned on P.E.I. but are banned in Ontario and Quebec, for example.
Brown was guest speaker at the annual general meeting of the P.E.I. Environmental Health Co-operative in Charlottetown.
Labchuk was first at the microphone to challenge Brown, saying the ban on just one chemical is far from what is needed.
"What possessed you to think that this legislation that you are bringing in, banning one chemical, was what people of Prince Edward Island wanted?" asked Labchuk.
Brown repeated a refrain through the night, saying that two legislative committees were not prepared to recommend any ban, but Premier Robert Ghiz directed cabinet to take action instead of just talking.
"It's a stepped approach," said Brown. "We have taken the same approach as New Brunswick here."
There will be a big public relations program with a website, media ads, public workshops and events to help explain the ban and encourage sustainable alternatives, the meeting was told.
Brown said that come April 1, a process will begin where complaints about any lawn chemical will be received by government if there is some science provided with the complaint to back up its danger. That chemical will be added to a list, the list will be discussed regularly with New Brunswick and Nova Scotia and all three provinces will agree together on which chemicals will move to the banned list.
Others at the meeting wanted a timeline for when the list of banned chemical will expand.
Brown would not commit to dates.
"We have banned one of the worst chemicals, we are told, 2,4-D, from the use on lawns and it's a start," said Brown. "I believe in the stepped approach."
Even with just the one chemical banned, his department has received letters from corporations, saying the province doesn't have the legal authority for the ban. Brown said that the letters were not threatening court action, but the P.E.I. government is prepared to fight.

Golf courses are exempt but are required to use 2,4-D in a controlled manner in isolate spots as needed.
A pesticide ban on golf courses would have shut them down but they are an "economic driver," said Brown.
All other government properties, including roadways, are to go pesticide free as of April 1, he said.
Agriculture, aquaculture and forestry are not affected by the ban, said Brown.
"We have been working with the agriculture community and it has demonstrated to myself and to government that they are working towards reduction and we are going to work with the agriculture community in order to reduce. We are not prepared to shut down the agriculture community on Prince Edward Island."

Comments

  • Username
    Jill
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:39:12

    Shut down golf and agriculture if they have to use pesticides.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Citizen
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:30:22

    I'm glad to see that there is finaly going to be a complete ban on pesticides on government property.

    I think we have the science available to us to know what lawn care chemicals are bad for human health, and I'm pretty sure it's more than just one.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Love those weeds
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:30:12

    Can't wait for the weeds and dandylions to take over the lawns in the coming years....either ban pesticides for everyone or not at all....for the most part, anywhere these chemicals are used is in a residential area, on community water, so any runoff into steams is minimal....on farmers fields now, the runoff is directly into streams...where is the common sense here....and that is the problem.....there is none!!!!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Selective Ban for PEI
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:21:55

    I wouldn't call this a Ban. I would call this restrictions on a Selective Few! The only people this seems to be singling out
    are Home Owners/Tax Payers!

    I applaud Sharon Lachuk on her steadfast efforts in trying to provide a healthy environment for Islanders against great odds!

    And why should we have to follow N.S. and N.B.'s lead? We're neighbours but that doesn't mean we have the same enviroment or chemical problems!

    I am amused that our agriculture, aquaculture and forestry sectors, two of whom produce the Food we eat and forests which play a large role in sustaining a Healthy Environment have been again given a green light on reduction practices!

    Our Lawns can't use pesticides or insecticides but our Farm Lands, Oceans and Forests can be fed Toxic Cocktails with no restraints!

    And of course our Golf Courses which are our Main Tourism Draw are also free to indulge !

    Come Play on our Healthy Island! (grin)

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Slip
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:00:20

    Personal agendas and actions not clearly thought out bring usually don't accomplish much.

    Will Minister Brown explain how commonly used lawn pesticides can enter my tap water in Charlottetown?

    Ms Labchuk adds nothing but warmed over tired rhetoric.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Juke
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:50:22

    Here is the first line of the NB press release from last year.

    The sale and use of more than 200 over-the-counter lawn care pesticide products, and the use of all 2,4-D products on domestic lawns in the province, will be banned by the Department of Environment as of fall 2009.


    Was this real or is it like the PEI BAN( ?). What is banned on PEI? one product? Is it actually banned?

    Brown is comparing PEI's BAN (?) with the regs. in NB. What are the facts, Guardian? What is really happening in NB?

    This info would be very helpful to this story.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Well Done!
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:49:37

    Well done! Just remember, we never voted for NB or NS politicians e mistakenly chose this group of misfits over here.

    STOP HIDING BEHIND THE COMMENTS WE ARE TAKING THE SAME APPROACH AS NB OR WE ARE TAKING THE SAME APPROACH AS NS . This is the 3rd or fourth time, all on different topics, you've said this. We are Islanders and unless we want to give up our right to govern ourselves, lets start making decisions that are best for ISLANDERS!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Same Old
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:49:04

    Same B.S. Approach. Senceless, No action will ever be taken. The chemcial companys have Brown and company in there pocket!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    bruce
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:46:23

    I often wonder about why some people, who are so negative are so critical? This is the first government that did something about these chemicals and yet people are still not satisfied. I was at the meeting last night and no where did I hear from Minister Brown that this ban was the only thing that will be done. I believe that this is a big step ,considering 98% is what is being banned. Yes I heard from others who weren't satisfied and they have a right to their views, but it would help if they were to get together and worked towards this ban with ideas that can work. Yes there are political parties that will not accecpt this law but until they are in power , they should come up with suggestions and ideas that Minister Brown said would help the process , move forward rather than a political arena and Sharon you know what I mean

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    sjj
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:40:42

    the rich buddies of the ghiz gang gets a free pass to use the products but the average tax payer get's the shaft. makes for good government in their eye's . give your head a shake mr brown. your rich buddies will turn on you in the next election, because they need to keep their place on money wagon that our government's on pei seem to want to keep rolling. no robin hood here, [you know the guy that used to take from the rich and give to the poor] our government takes from the poor and gives to the rich. mr ghiz and mr binns have screwed us over big time and have set it up so we the tax payer have no say in anything. we need 600.000 dollar's for a cancer drug [NO MONEY FOR IT SO SAY'S BURTRUM] BUT YET THEY GAVE 600.000 DOLLARS TO THE IRVING'S FOR NOTHING THEY DIDN'T NEED OR ASK FOR IT[EXPLAIN THAT] all the mp's and mla's should hide their heads in a bucket so we could kick it every time they feed their rich buddies but we would need more the 139.000 people because we would have very sore feet at the end of the day.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Little_Richard
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:36:58

    Is anyone really surprised that Richard Brown would not apologize? I never heard an I'm sorry about the PMP scandal that he began to head up before passing it off to Alan Campbell, so I am darn sure he is not too concerned about the environment.

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Guardian is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Expert bloggers

Ride for Heart
Blogger
Heart and Stroke Foundation
Preparation is key
[Sponsored]

More bloggers here

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

The Guardian Twitter

Advertising