Customize your website

Charlottetown launches tax incentive plan Jan. 1



Published on December 22nd, 2009
Published on June 15th, 2010
Dave Stewart RSS Feed
Topics :
The Guardian , Superior Propane , Charlottetown , Allen Street , Kensington Road

The City of Charlottetown wants to boost development with one tax plan while it hopes a retired judge's report sees municipal revenue boosted on another.
The city will launch its tax incentive policy on Jan. 1 that aims to boost development in the greater capital area and maybe even see some industrial-type businesses move out of residential areas.
Judge Ralph Thompson, chair of the Commission on Land and Local Governance, is expected to deliver his report on everything from land use planning to taxation and grants and the review of countless legislative acts.
Charlottetown Mayor Clifford Lee says the big key for 2010 in the capital will be whether Thompson thinks the province should return to the tax credit system instead of the grant system.
In terms of the tax incentive, it redefines the types of development that would qualify.
In the past, the city was focused on the downtown core and filling a number of vacant buildings.
That has started to take place so now the city is casting the new policy across the entire municipality.
"I was able to convince council to create an incentive for relocating commercial business out of residential areas," Lee told The Guardian.
"In some parts of our city now we have some industrial uses in the middle of residential areas, which from a planning perspective is not the best thing to have."
The propane tank farm and tractor-trailer businesses on Allen Street and the gravel pit off Kensington Road spring immediately to mind but a lot of industrial businesses that now blend in with residential areas located there before the amalgamated city developed zoning and development bylaws.
"There is an opportunity for incentives for some of these commercial/industrial uses to vacate the residential areas. We're certainly not going to be forcing anybody to relocate but if, for example, Superior Propane on Allen Street decided they would like to move to an industrial park, which would be a more appropriate area for that business to operate, there would be incentives for them to move to a new location."
If a business, such as the one Lee cited were to move, for the first year on any increased assessed value there would be no additional tax on the additional increase in year one.
In the second year, that business would pay 20 per cent of the increased assessment. Year three it goes to 40 per cent and by year five it grows to 100 per cent.
The property which has been vacated by the move of the industrial business would most likely revert to residential use, depending on the zoning council allows.
"Once you qualify under the incentive program then the property can only be redeveloped residentially, assuming the area they
are leaving is a residential area."
That program begins just as the city waits to hear what Thompson writes in his report.
The province collects property taxes for the city. Historically, that money has been returned to the capital in the form of a tax credit.
"The amount returned to the city every year through the tax credit system was based on the assessment of the properties in the city," Lee says. "As the city developed and more development took place that credit increased on an annual basis."
So, if assessments went up five per cent, revenue from the province into the city's coffers went up five per cent.
The Robert Ghiz government chose to move from that system to a grant-based format.
"My concern is that that grant system is based on ... the province's ability to pay ... they can freeze the grant, they can reduce the grant they pay to municipalities."
Lee hopes Thompson's report addresses that issue.
"We're hopeful that the commissioner will see the merits of the arguments that municipalities have put forward in relationship to that."

Tax issues for 2010:

* Tax incentive - Businesses that move out of residential areas will not be taxed on the additional assessment in year one. A sliding scale will see these businesses not pay 100 per cent of the increase in assessed value until year five.
* City is hoping retired judge Ralph Thompson's report on land issues and governance will recommend the province replace its tax grant system with the old tax credit system. Municipalities such as Charlottetown made more revenue under the old system.


Comments

  • Username
    PEI
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:26:00

    I think that this is an excellent idea. I have been very critical of the City's spending habits in the past. But I certainly can't complain in this instance.

    This kind of incentive promotes commerce and encourages the business sector to build infrastructure and create jobs. This tax relief is only temporary and decreases over five years to zero. Consequently every resident of Charlottetown will see these busineses pay higher taxes and provide some tax relief for us.

    Would you rather see empty rundown buildings all over Charlottetown?

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    country boy
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:07:06

    I can't wait for Judge Thompsons report. I hope that he will recommend to establish county councils and eliminate all of these small town councils. You would then have two city councils which are Summerside and Charlottetown and the rest of the island would be governed by 3 county councils. You would end up with 2 mayors, 3 reeves and an appropriate number of councilors depending on population in each county excluding the 2 major cities. Of course this would mean co-operation and acceptance of change.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    billy
    - June 21st, 2010 at 20:05:36

    How about a policy that helped ordinary residents! I am sick and tired of hearing how they give Tax Breaks to the rich and raise taxes on the rest of us. Disgusting!!!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    sick and tired
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:50:39

    Is anyone else sick and tired of seeing our tax dollars go to wasteful boondoggles and to lower the taxes of subsidize others? Don't get me wrong. There are plenty of good things our government does. For example, Victoria Park is well used by many. The streets our plowed. Even the under-utilized bus service can be justified. But my gosh, why should my taxes be kept high so the well heeled and well connected can get breaks and subsidies?

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    huh?
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:46:31

    are all business owners 'rich', Billy Mac?

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Guardian is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

The Guardian Twitter

Advertising