• Article
  • Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (1)
  •  

Military Blog Site - with Robby McRobb Blog

Tying the hands of our soldiers ! !

What next ! ! ! ! what with our opposition parties calling for immediate withdrawal. The Afghan Parliament further wishes to tie the hands of our serving soldiers.

A copy of the report from the CBC:

Afghan legislators passed a bill Tuesday calling on the government to open dialogue with Taliban fighters and prohibiting international forces from firing their weapons and launching raids, unless they come under attack first.

The bill was passed by a voice vote in the upper house. It would also need to be approved by the lower house and signed by President Hamid Karzai before coming law.

The bill said negotiations should only be held with Afghan Taliban militants, not Pakistani Taliban fighters or al-Qaeda operatives. It said the aim would be to persuade the militants to give up their fight against the government.

The bill would also prohibit international forces from launching military operations, unless they are attacked or have first consulted with the Afghan army, government or police.

If the President of Afghanistan signs this bill into law,not only will it decrease the chance for NATO to defeat the Taliban.....But it will give the Taliban a much greater edge Tactically. This is not what our Generals or indeed our troops need at this time in the Afghan Campaign.

It is reminiscent of the UN card that peacekeepers carry which say do not fire until you confirm you are being fired upon. Announce in a loud voice 3 times I am UN, I am UN , I am UN . Only after these actions were taken. Were UN Troops allowed to protect themselves. This in itself is ludricous, but peacekeeping missions are far different than this operation.

Please Support our guys and gals wear Red on Friday

Nil Sine Labore

Robby

Comments

  • Username
    Eric
    - June 29, 2010 at 08:50:41

    These Rules of engagment were inplace when this first started. Canadian Military Unfortunately are use to this but the Americans? I think not. You are right though this is not the time for this type of action by their government. Negotiation along with a stable local area protected by firepower until the local deal is signed is my view on how to do this. It interesting that this comes at the same time as the agreement in Ireland is solidified.

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Guardian is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Notice
The management of this site indicates that it is not liable for persons, organizations and / or organizations to register in order to promote and make themselves known. Moreover, the managers of this site should not be held responsible for errors or other errors that slip inside information recorded under this heading.

Advertising

Expert bloggers

Ride for Heart
Blogger
Heart and Stroke Foundation
Sore buns . . . happy heart!
[Sponsored]

More bloggers here

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

The Guardian Twitter

Advertising